It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

and for one for he said: ??? is exempt why is it that It is necessary to teach this he read ??? this one all ??? he He could say to you It is necessary to teach this he read in a case ??? of it ??? in a case ??? vessels ??? Come and hear: for it teaches: pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama four ??? they all require ??? in part and thanks in part ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? How so? Is this not ??? No. for he said: for him three ??? to you and they died? all of them ??? And he said to him: ??? one No. they were items Always, and one ??? and one ??? to you ??? he Come and hear: for it teaches: Avuah of Rabbi ??? Chiyya the first a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? says yes. to you ??? anything and the witnesses ??? that specific in which there is in his hand ??? zuz It is possible shall vow on ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 22) on all it was lost misplaced who it is said For is this on ??? his mouth you ??? and if you ??? on ??? witnesses ??? upon it For R' Chiyya R' Chiyya a Tanna taught: he ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he read he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: This certain individual ??? a small portion of ??? and Avuah For R' ??? He could say to you it is written he and then it is written this one ??? a small portion of ??? and one ??? witnesses this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper And the other one one ??? a small portion of ??? and one ??? And the other one give thanks ??? he does not have reasoned for him ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? to him ??? is exempt and Rabban Gamliel ??? This certain individual ??? where they did ??? for him all day ??? day one ??? for him without ??? He said to them No. they were items Always, they came ??? of him. he was eating both ??? R' Zayra said: if ??? Chiyya the first ??? Abaye said to him: if ??? Hey, isn't it the case that a thief he He said to him ??? now also ??? Chiyya ??? For it was taught in a baraita a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand yes. to you ??? is exempt And Rav Nachman says ??? that specific ??? of Rav ??? She

דף ה,ב גמרא

??? No. ??? Is it not enough for him that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? and Rav Yehudah said ??? is invalid, There is no difficulty. this one according to his own reason this one of the world For if it was No. you say thus We ??? in what way does ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Lev. 19) before ??? No. ??? except ??? yes. a person a sinner and not ??? this shall vow that there is not in it, of his, less than half ??? on is what he has ??? or on the one who does not have ??? Rav Huna said for he said: ??? in which there is for me of it And there is no meaning to the word for me of it less than half And let him say ??? mine and who ??? for him All of it And let him say ??? mine ??? for him ??? now also ??? for him ??? for he said: all of it is mine ??? in which there is for me of it And there is no meaning to the word for me of it less than half And so based on this lit: from after, for this ??? and this ??? -- this refers to For what reason R' Yochanan said: ??? -- this refers to well-being of the sages She that it should not be Each and every one walks ??? of his fellow And it is said: mine he And let him say ??? suspects also ??? we do not say ??? suspects ??? For if it was No. you say thus This for he said: the Merciful One give thanks a small portion of ??? shall vow Let him say ??? suspects ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? for him ??? Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: for he said: Rav Idi bar Avin Rav Chisdah said ??? is valid ??? is invalid, ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for it teaches: pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama four ??? they all require ??? in part and thanks in part ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? Let him say ??? suspects ??? there i.e., in another mishna also ??? reasoned ??? for him ??? for him ??? for him If so, ??? why is it that is invalid, ??? Let him say ??? reasoned until ??? for him For say ??? is invalid, ??? For example, ??? of him. ??? and it was know ??? and took for him in his hands but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For Rav Huna said: ??? that specific ??? that is not ??? Let him say ??? suspects ??? there i.e., in another mishna also ??? and he said he is equivalent. ??? for him He said to him: Rav Acha ??? And then it happened that he crossed on Is this not (Ex. 20) that is not ??? Do not covet ??? without he is equivalent. ??? them

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.