It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נא,א גמרא

It is because of this: thus they returned except If you say, sell also ??? he is equivalent. What then does it mean when it says ??? them ??? so that thus it will be ??? for him rabbis ??? Here, too, my slave for him rabbis ??? No. ??? that erred ??? son of Chama ??? wine; and he erred he found ??? He said to him why is it that ??? He said to him ??? wine; ??? He said to him ??? he returns about You He said to him: this one ??? for me -- more ??? or ??? in front of Rav ??? He said to him They did not teach such a ruling except the purchaser but: sell In reality lit: In the world he returns What is the reason? the purchaser ??? in his hand all in a case ??? for him and there are those who say If it was he erred If it was No. he erred sell that is not ??? in his hands until ??? for him ??? know If it was he erred and if No. he erred There was this guy ??? a seminal emission ??? and if are they, ??? for him ??? and a fraction it was. ??? he came There was this guy and he said If it was ??? for him ??? and a fraction ??? for him ??? he came in front of Raba He said to him They did not teach such a ruling except ??? from ??? but: ??? the house he (upon it) does not have ??? There was this guy ??? and took ??? a seminal emission ??? and if are they, ??? for him ??? it was. ??? he came There was this guy and he said If it was ??? for him ??? for him ??? he came in front of Rav Chisda He said to him They did not teach such a ruling except ??? from ??? but: ??? from the master of the house he (upon it) does not have ??? He said to him Rav Dimi and that which is upright and thus Rabbi Eliezer said and that which is upright Hey, isn't it the case that We We have learnt in a Mishna: in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? one ??? Is this not the master of the house Rav Chisdah said ??? but: ??? upon it No. ??? them If it was Is this not for the value ???

דף נא,א משנה

one the one who purchased and one ??? there is regarding them ??? in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? and Rabbi Yehudah says yes. ??? who ??? upon it ??? on the upper one running says to him give for me ??? or give for me Just as ???

דף נא,א גמרא

??? words ??? (Lev. 25) And so ??? to ??? yes. for me except ??? the purchaser ??? sell from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 25) or he bought to ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? the purchaser and It is necessary to teach this ??? sell For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: sell It is because of this: ??? for him ??? but: the purchaser that is not ??? for him ??? I would say No. ??? the Merciful One without ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the purchaser It is because of this: that he came ??? that they said a person ??? which You have acquired." but: sell ??? that they said ??? I would say No. ??? the Merciful One without ??? Rabbi Yehudah says yes. ??? It is because of this: that he was ??? he (??? ) does not have Rav Nachman said Rav said ??? What is the reason? ??? know ??? how much ??? and that one ??? thus It is because of this: ??? for him ??? and now from this ??? he returns of him. Rav Ashi said: What then does it mean when it says yes. ??? he does not ??? for even if less than ??? he returns This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? he (??? ) does not have because it was ??? who ??? upon it ??? on the upper one ??? In accordance with whom is the position of our mishna? No. Rabbi Natan and not Rabbi Yehudah ??? If it was Rabbi Natan But in our mishna, it is taught: running ??? No. The tanna teaches: running If it was Rabbi Yehudah ??? But in our mishna, it is taught: the purchaser ??? The tanna teaches: sell ??? Rabbi Eliezer said ??? -- this refers to Really? know who ??? Rava said: In reality lit: In the world Rabbi Natan She It was taught by also ??? running Rava said: In reality lit: In the world R' Yehudah ??? She And what does it mean when it says ??? Rav Ashi said ??? also where he teaches one the one who purchased and one ??? for him ??? Learn from this ??? Learn from this it was said: One who says to his fellow in order that do not to you by the ??? Rav said: he has upon it ??? And Shmuel said he (upon it) does not have ??? Let us say, Rav for he said: like Rabbi ??? And for Shmuel for he said: like Rabbi Yehudah as it is taught: One who says ??? Behold! ??? for me in order that do not to you by the the remainder of ??? and answer Behold! This is ??? wasted These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah says In the matter ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived Rav would say to you I that they said Even if according to R' Yehudah Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna except ??? sickens

דף נא,ב גמרא

But here, in this case, who know ??? And Shmuel said I that they said even According to Rabbi Meir, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna except ??? He uprooted But here, in this case, who ??? that he came He uprooted something Rav said ??? To me ??? for me of him ??? Shmuel One who says to his fellow in order that do not to you by the ??? he (upon it) does not have ??? in which is not ??? Behold! there are in it ??? They challenged him from this teaching: One who married who gives ??? and the one who says to his fellow ??? that do not to you by the ??? he (upon it) does not have ??? for Rav, for he said: I that they said even according to R' Yehudah So, with whom does it agree? Abayye said: ??? Rav said: like Rabbi Meir And for Shmuel for he said: like R' Yehudah Rava said: There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? as it is taught: Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but: ??? sell who said ??? valued him, and this that I sell to you ??? I know in it that is not the value of except a maneh worth one hundred dinars in order that do not to you by the ??? he (upon it) does not have ??? and thus the purchaser who said ??? valued him, and this that I the purchaser from you ??? I know in it ??? two hundred ??? that do not to you by the ??? he (upon it) does not have ??? The Rabbis taught One who married who gives ??? Behold! this No. ??? evil ??? and ??? except or both this and this ??? or both this and this ??? he gives to him the reward for ??? the reward for a camel the reward for ??? the reward for himself he does not take immediately he gave to him his worth must make restitution his worth must make restitution ??? he will give for him Rav Pappa said: ??? four ???

דף נא,ב משנה

how much shall be ??? and not ??? of it ??? Rabbi Meir says: four ??? and R' Yehuda says: four ??? and Rabbi Shimon says:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.