It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נג,א גמרא

and are forbidden ??? there are. ??? a priest ??? on the first hundred ??? the evening sun Behold! these from terumah ??? Just as that do not thus ??? What then does it mean when it says Just as that do not thus ??? Is this not from this general principle it would follow ??? and if ??? it was. for him a thing in which there is to him permit and any thing thing in which there is to him permit Even if in a case where there are one thousand No. ??? And from where do you derive of its blood that do not thus ??? Perhaps No. ??? A general principle: No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? thus ??? terumah ??? The tanna teaches: my voice ??? No. The tanna teaches: And then it happened that It was taught by there are. ??? a priest No. You might have thought as it is taught: clearly and explicitly second tithe ??? second tithe And they said ??? in which is not the value of ??? to Jerusalem and went out and if ??? for him ??? for him on coins ??? that is not ??? tithe is what he has ??? a law established by the Torah and Rabbinic law, not. ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Perhaps will come to include certainly ??? two ??? upon them tithe ??? This on how ??? Who deduces ??? two ??? No. ??? No. ??? he returns ??? for him ??? is a law established by the Rabbis a law established by the Torah and Rabbinic law, not. ??? Perhaps will come to include ??? to Jerusalem and went out But why? ??? for he said: R' Elazar from where do we learn ??? two that became tamei, ??? that specific

דף נג,ב גמרא

even in Jerusalem as it is said (Deut. 14) For No. ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? except food as it is said (Gen. 43) ??? his face except ??? By means of money second tithe ??? By means of money tithe also ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? By means of money second tithe that became tamei, ??? like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? If it was Rabbi Yehudah why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of he has fulfilled his obligation even He has not fulfilled his obligation. also But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? And what does it mean when it says he has fulfilled his obligation ??? For didn't Raba say a partition to eat a law established by the Torah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis And so ??? rabbis For ??? For ??? No. ??? rabbis No. ??? rabbis between ??? between ??? Rav Huna the son of Yehuda Rav Sheshet said one The tanna teaches: second tithe in which is not the value of ??? to Jerusalem and went out why is it that ??? Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't Raba say a partition to eat a law established by the Torah a partition ??? is a law established by the Rabbis And so ??? rabbis For ??? For ??? No. ??? rabbis No. ??? rabbis If so, why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of yes. in it the value of ??? even there are in it also No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? there are in it ??? for him ??? but: yes. in it I would say No. ??? for him ??? Come and hear from this The Rabbis taught (Lev. 27) if ??? a man ??? and not all ??? creates an exclusion ??? two in which is not the value of ??? it was said: Rav Ami he said yes. in it Rav ??? he said yes. ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: yes. in it Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said yes. ??? They challenged him from this teaching: second tithe in which is not the value of ??? he ??? on coins ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: yes. ??? we were where he teaches ??? is in it immediately ??? there is not in this case. then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? yes. in it What then does it mean when it says ??? it is a problem They posed this difficulty: ??? or ??? Ravina said Come and hear: ??? say ??? and every person ??? because of ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth he said one Behold! by the ??? and one

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.