It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נח,א גמרא

??? And if not, ??? to the children of the city and the sons of the city ??? others ??? or ??? both these and these: ??? are these And there is no meaning to the word we go up to them ??? Shmuel said Here in this case, ??? the reward for is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? to be picked up their reward. If so, ??? to the children of the city he had asked for him Rabbah said ??? to the children of the city ??? so that thus it will be that is not ??? and So, too, so that thus it will be that is not ??? them ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? or ??? The tanna teaches: ??? the reward for ??? a lost item ??? and Here in this case, also, ??? No. ??? from this ??? Rabbah said ??? he loses it ??? has sunk in the sea Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: So, with whom does it agree? It is Rabbi Shimon for he said: holy offerings ??? to replace them there is regarding them ??? upon them ??? before it was even the case that ??? holy offerings that is not he is liable to replace them ??? as it is taught: ??? on ??? and on ??? and on the future ??? except R' Elazar said ??? -- this refers to well-being of the sages She that it shall not be people ??? the reward for he does not ??? Rav Yosef pointed out a contradition to him son of Chama ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? the reward for he does not must make restitution We challenge that from the following baraita ??? ??? to watch ??? to watch ??? to watch ??? yes. ??? to him the reward for Sabbath For this reason yes. liens on Sabbath upon it he was ??? Sabbath ??? new ??? year" ??? to him the reward for Sabbath For this reason liens on Sabbath upon it Is this not to make whole No. ??? his worth If so, But the beginning of the teaching, where he teaches yes. liens on Sabbath upon it Here, too, ??? his worth and who it has the reward for Sabbath Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: yes. ??? to him the reward for Sabbath He was silent. He said to him something Have you heard In this case, He said to him Thus said Rav Sheishet ??? and thus that R' Yochanan said ??? Rabbi Shimon says: holy offerings ??? to replace them there is regarding them ??? but when it is not he is liable to replace them Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front For R' Isaac son of Abba holy offerings ??? to replace them he is liable that I reads of them (Lev. 5) in Hashem. ??? but when it is not he is liable to replace them is exempt that I reads of them ??? He said to him: ???

דף נח,ב גמרא

??? He said to him: ??? He said to him: No. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: holy offerings ??? to replace them he is liable ??? but when it is not he is liable to replace them is exempt ??? Rabbi Yehudah says Even ??? a Torah scroll ??? and livestock they do not have ??? It was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says Even ??? a Torah scroll It does not have ??? on account of that do not ??? livestock ??? they do not have ??? because of ??? They said to him: Is it not the case that The entirety a person ??? And Rabbi Yehudah Behold! ??? for him and Behold! No. ??? for him and up to how much he said Ameimar until so that ??? It was taught: R' Yehudah en Beteira says Even ??? they do not have ??? because of in which there is of them life ???

דף נח,ב משנה

in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? regarding items he does not say to him ??? valued him, and this This is only in the case he does not ??? if he was the master of a response he does not say to him ??? that are the first if he son of is destiny? ??? he does not say to him ??? It once happened ??? as it is said (Ex. 22) ??? No. ??? and not ???

דף נח,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 25) No. ??? a man ??? items is what the scripture says. You say ??? items Or perhaps, except ??? money or property For as it says: (Lev. 25) And so ??? or he bought immediately ??? Behold! ??? money or property say So how am I to resolve that (Lev. 25) No. ??? a man ??? items How so? if he was the master of a response to it is said to him ??? that are the first if he was son of is destiny? ??? to it is said to him ??? It once happened ??? if he was ??? came to learn Torah to it is said to him "Here is who ate ??? came to learn Torah ??? if they were sufferings have come upon it if they were ??? have come upon it or that he was ??? his children to it is said to him like the way where they said to him ??? (Job 4) Watch out for leading vav Is it not the case that ??? male, please, who he ??? if they were ??? from him he does not say to them Let them go next to so-and-so that he was sell ??? and he knows in it that did not have ??? Always, Rabbi Yehudah says Also, not any let him hang it i.e., let him blame his suffering ??? on ??? at the hour that do not to him ??? for behold! ??? and any thing thing ??? it is said in it and fear of ??? that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? The greatness ??? items ??? money or property for this it is said in it (Lev. 25) and fear of ??? and this It is not said in it and fear of ??? and R' Elazar says this ??? and this ??? Rabbi Shmuel son of Nachmeni he said this ??? and this No. ??? It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? son of Isaac all ??? the face of his fellow among the many it is as if poured ??? He said to him then the ruling is acceptable. ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? for him ??? and comes ??? Abaye said to him: for Rav, ??? in the west in what way ??? He said to him ??? for he said: Rabbi ??? The entirety ??? except from three The entirety ??? except I would say all ??? except from three ??? And there is no meaning to the word we go up and they are that comes on ??? a man ??? the face of his fellow among the many ??? in that place evil" to his fellow ??? we were ??? even though ??? of him. ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.