It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סא,א גמרא

if he does not one topic ??? silver for behold! Already it is said (Deut. 23) No. ??? one topic ??? silver yes. for me except ??? from where do we learn it is said ??? and it is said ??? Just as ??? is said ??? No. ??? in it between By means of money between ??? between ??? between with usurious interest Even ??? is said ??? No. ??? in it between By means of money between ??? between ??? between with usurious interest from where do we learn ??? any thing Scripture states: (Deut. 23) ??? any thing who ??? Ravina he said No. ??? and not usurious interest By means of money It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. he read For if it was it is written ??? No. ??? to him ??? now As it is written ??? No. ??? to him ??? No. ??? a seminal emission of him. thus ??? No. ??? to him ??? No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that a Tanna taught: it is said it is said he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Watch out for leading vav !! And even It is not said he read I was says ??? the value of now as it is said he read ??? It is not necessary except ??? the value of why do I have ??? any thing who ??? that is not the writing of ??? Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One Is this not with usurious interest Is this not ??? Is this not ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Is this not with usurious interest It is because of this: ??? he that even ??? the Merciful One and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Is this not ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Is this not ??? It is because of this: that is not know ??? one ??? No. We come to compare ??? one ??? Which ??? No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah Is this not with usurious interest ??? Just as ??? which provides that did not have ??? shall you say with usurious interest ??? No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah Is this not ??? Just as ??? which provides yes. a way a purchase ??? objection except No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah Is this not ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? Just as ??? which provides No. know ??? usurious interest ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them which provides ??? Even I ??? They said: Here, too, except Is this not ??? why do I have ??? the reward for ??? the reward for ??? clearly and explicitly it is written of him. (Deut. 24) No. ??? Responded ??? to cross over upon it with two ??? with usurious interest ??? and to cross over upon it with two ??? a thing ???

דף סא,ב גמרא

??? it is written (Lev. 19) No. ??? the Merciful One why do I have to account for that which was taught (Ex. 20) No. ??? in order ??? No. ??? in order to make whole restitutions for ??? He said to him Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Is this not ??? the Merciful One ??? why do I have He said to him ??? with salt we were ??? he to cross over upon it ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 19) No. ??? the yoke of in justice ??? -- this refers to ??? that did not have ??? to one in the days of the sun and to one in the days of the rains ??? that did not have ??? with salt ??? that did not have ??? Is it not the case that items is a kal vachomer for just as ??? that it one ??? upon it Torah is a kal vachomer ??? and the third ??? Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One the Exodus from Egypt with usurious interest the Exodus from Egypt regarding fringes, the Exodus from Egypt ??? The Holy One, Who is Blessed, said I he ??? on the Egyptians between ??? of first-born ??? that is not of first-born I he ??? ??? to Israel with usurious interest ??? with salt ??? tree ??? And it is said: ??? he Ravina ??? He said to him Rav ??? the Exodus from Egypt ??? the Merciful One regarding ??? why do I have He said to him The Holy One, Who is Blessed, said I he ??? between ??? of first-born ??? that is not of first-born I future ??? fish ??? fish ??? to Israel He said to him: I ??? it is a problem for me Why is it different here, ??? the Merciful One He said to him ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael The Holy One, Who is Blessed, said ??? Israel from Egypt. except on account of This item that do not impart tumah ??? He said to him and who ??? He said to him even though that is not ??? and Who is ??? who gives much ??? How so? ??? from him ??? gold ??? because all Behold! ??? until now Is this not usurious interest he R' Abahu said Up to this point, of Torah from here and onwards of their words and thus Rabba said: Up to this point, of Torah from here and onwards of their words ??? (Job 27) ??? a wicked person ??? a righteous person Up to this point, And naught else except Even if ??? a wicked person ??? a righteous person ??? usurious interest ??? from here and onwards ??? usurious interest R' Elazar said usurious interest ??? usurious interest It is not ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: even usurious interest ??? also It is not ??? R' Yitzchak said What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Yochanan For scripture said: (Ezek. 18) ??? he gave ??? No. ??? all ??? One who acts ??? and not ??? Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? he said Scripture states: (Lev. 25) to ??? and fear of ??? and not ??? Rava said: ??? we heard for him (Ezek. 18) shall certainly die" ??? in it it shall be ??? usurious interest ??? Just as ??? No. ??? Even ??? usurious interest No. ??? son of Isaac What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? For scripture said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.