It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ז,א גמרא

Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say ??? certainly the Merciful One in the Torah says and not ??? doubt whether Here in this case, also, ??? certainly the Merciful One in the Torah says and not ??? doubt whether He said to him Rav Acha ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say doubt whether ??? (Lev. 27) it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use the Merciful One in the Torah says and not immediately ??? except doubt whether redemption he exempted a donkey And it is like Rav ??? for he said: Rav ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah Israel in which there is to him ten doubt whether ??? a donkey in the midst of his house ??? about them ten ??? there are. are his What then do we do about it? ??? Come and hear: for thus said Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: it was. ??? among Rav Chisda and Rav Chisda among Rav Huna ??? for he said: Rav ??? all money or property that do not It is possible ??? he does not ??? this one It is possible ??? even though that is not ??? For didn't R' Yochanan say ??? and not ??? both ??? it is possible for them ??? this on account of that is not are his and this on account of that is not ??? Who deduces ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and so when It is possible ??? Watch out for leading vav For Rav learned: ??? a son of the West in front For R' ??? two ??? of a garment this take until a place ??? and this take until a place ??? they divide ??? for him Rabbi Abahu ??? except Our mishna where he teaches ??? and not The tanna teaches: this take until a place ??? in what way does It concerns itself Rav Pappa said: ??? Rav said ??? Learn from this This ??? immediately ??? of him. three on three we recite of him. (Ruth 4) and gave ??? he is equivalent. ??? and what is the difference here, ??? for he said: Rav Chisda writ ??? in his hand if It is possible ??? opposite him. It is not ??? And if not, ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? in the case of there is not in this case. Here in this case, ??? in the case of And this is present here. Rabba said: if it was ??? they divide This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this and it was standing ??? among ??? Here, too, This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? to join with the body of ??? What would you have said? ??? thus Come and learn from this. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? thus ??? The Rabbis taught two ??? with a contract ??? says mine he and it fell from me ??? he said ??? he ??? to you ??? these are the words of Rabbi Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says they shall divide stillborn lit., fallen ??? No. ??? R' Yosei says Behold! he ??? Mar said: ??? and regarding for him ??? completely and he does not have ??? two are grasping etc. Rabba said: Rav Nachman said ??? the words of all are they shall divide Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? Rabbi reasoned give thanks with a contract ??? It is necessary for him ??? and if is fulfilled lit. is stood up for him ??? and if No. is fulfilled lit. is stood up for him No. ??? What is the reason? ??? in reality he one ??? for him for this ??? this one he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? reasoned give thanks with a contract ??? it is not necessary ??? and even though that is not is fulfilled lit. is stood up for him they shall divide stillborn lit., fallen ??? No. ???

דף ז,ב גמרא

what is the difference here, ??? Rabba said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and after ??? a legal document ??? and How so? ??? of him. ??? No. ??? and not ??? it is not written: of him. ??? That there are to say the writing of ??? and not ??? except Even if the writing of of him. ??? He does not return ??? and Rabbi Yosei says: Behold! he ??? and not there is a fear of them. ??? and not ??? R' Yosi ??? For it was taught: he found a legal document her ketuba ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? give thanks he returns ??? yes. ??? give thanks He does not return No. to this and not to this Rabbi Yosei says: ??? under ??? he returns ??? or ??? He does not return No. to this and not to this ??? stillborn lit., fallen ??? No. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei but the sages say Behold! he ??? If so, it is a problem is a law established by the Rabbis ??? a legal document her ketuba All of it Rabbi Yosei and it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: yes. ??? give thanks He does not return No. to this and not to this In what matters are we saying this? who was widowed or who was divorced but: ??? under ??? he returns ??? says ??? under ??? he returns ??? or who was divorced He does not return No. to this and not to this Rav Papa said, In reality lit: In the world No. ??? Rabbi Yosei to their words is a law established by the Rabbis he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them To me even ??? or ??? also No. there is a fear of them. ??? for me Regardless, ??? under ??? the daughter of ??? She and they said to him: rabbis ??? Ravina he said In reality lit: In the world ??? the first and the reason is a law established by the Rabbis Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? to have two ??? and Rabbi Yosei, to have two ??? No. ??? Rabbi Eliezer said It is a disagreement ??? and both of them, ??? but: one ??? and one ??? this take ??? and this take ??? And R' Yochanan said: In reality lit: In the world they divide and even one ??? and one ??? For it was taught: this take until a place ??? it is not necessary to teach this and it was standing ??? among ??? If so, what is there to say? it is not necessary to teach this ??? to join with the body of ??? What would you have said? He said to him ??? thus Come and learn from this. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? thus ??? thus He said to him Rav Acha ??? to Rabbi ??? for he said: this take ??? and this take ??? what is the purpose according to him And so ??? he It is necessary for him He said to him ??? for he said thus: ??? that there is in it: time how much ??? of him. time how much ??? that there is in it: time regarding ??? And the other one No. regarding ??? he will give for him how ??? between and they shall divide also of which we were speaking? ??? For if it was No. you say thus two are grasping of a garment Here, too, ??? this one ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.