It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עו,א משנה

if the master of the house he returns in it ??? on the lower one all ??? on the lower one and all ??? in it ??? on the lower one

דף עו,א גמרא

they returned this to that No. The tanna teaches: except ??? this one for that one ??? workers? ??? How so? for he said: for him the master of the house ??? for me workers? and He went ??? How so? If it was for he said: for him the master of the house ??? and it comes ??? He said to them ??? the insinuations so Sonc. of What then does it mean when it says ??? and he has accepted If it was for he said: for him the master of the house ??? and it comes ??? He said to them ??? How so? How should we understand this? If it was for he said: them ??? by the ??? them ??? as it is taught: ??? ??? to do ??? his fellow he gives to him his worth must make restitution and he returns take ??? the house Just as ??? it is not necessary to teach this for he said: them ??? on the master of the house ??? workers? in what way does ??? it is not necessary to teach this That there are ??? and there are ??? for him If it was Is this not that you said to us ??? If you wish, I would say Here in this case, ??? the house is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? for him If it was Is this not that you said to us ??? it was. ??? son of the validity ??? If you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that they said for him immediately that you said to us ??? to you ??? also ??? know ??? and not ??? If you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world for he said: for him the master of the house ??? and He went ??? He said to them ??? and he has accepted that they said for him ??? to you (Prov. 3) to ??? good ??? This is obvious! If it was He said to him: the master of the house ??? and He went ??? He said to him ??? and there are those who say just as who said the master of the house ??? except If it was He said to him the master of the house ??? and He went ??? He said to them ??? They said: how much who said the master of the house What then does it mean when it says ??? that are his ??? that they said for him ??? to us ??? he said the master of the house or perhaps, ??? the house ??? Come and hear: that comes for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said ??? for me writs of divorce of and he says ??? how much ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said Even if they come writ ??? It is not ??? that are his ??? right next lit: and leaning For if it was You might have thought ??? right next lit: and leaning ??? from this ??? Rav Ashi said

דף עו,ב גמרא

thus now This is satisfactory If it was said ??? for me writs of divorce of and your wife he said that comes for me writs of divorce of and he says ??? just as ??? and he said ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said ??? writ ??? Perhaps, ??? right next lit: and leaning So, too, ??? writ ??? Perhaps, ??? that are his ??? right next lit: and leaning except there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? ??? No. ??? If you wish, I would say This a Tanna taught: they returned also ??? a seminal emission for him as it is taught: ??? The workers ??? the master of the house or the master of the house ??? those particular they do not have this on this except the insinuations so Sonc. of Regarding what matters are we speaking? that did not have ??? but: ??? and they did not find ??? and they found field ??? he gives to them their reward. must make restitution but: he does not ??? that comes required in going ??? makes work ??? and nullify In what matters are we saying this? that did not have ??? but: ??? to them Just as ??? How so? ??? with two ??? half of it ??? half of it ??? with two ??? to them Just as ??? he was proper Six ??? he gives to them a sela coin or ??? two ??? and if a sela coin he gives to them a sela coin R' ??? says ??? to them Just as ??? he was proper Six ??? he gives to them ??? or ??? two ??? and if a sela coin he gives to them a sela coin Regarding what matters are we speaking? In the matter that do not ??? but: In the matter ??? about them or ??? How so? ??? says to them a sela coin ??? to you ??? two and up to how much ??? about them until forty ??? zuz Regarding what matters are we speaking? at a time i.e., in a case that do not in that place workers? ??? but: there are in that place workers? ??? and he said "Go!" ??? he (about them) does not have except the insinuations so Sonc. of It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav he gives to them their reward. must make restitution He said to him: ??? he said Watch out for leading vav !! And even I ??? It was not ??? to them except as a worker wasted and is what you say? Do you really mean that? he gives to them their reward. must make restitution Hey, isn't it the case that He ascended The tanna teaches: he does not ??? that comes required ??? makes work ??? and nullify No. ??? in front that it is possible that they said ??? in front and thus he comes to say ??? he said If it was ??? I It was not ??? for him A general principle: and is what you say? Do you really mean that? as a worker wasted except it is a problem ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not ??? From twilight This is like for he said: Raba And if one ??? and he came ??? If it was ??? From twilight

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.