It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ט,א גמרא

??? this ??? R' Yehuda says: In reality lit: In the world No. he bought until that it should be ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, or there was one ??? and one leading ??? ??? and leading ??? yes. but: ??? No. it is the law that even ??? Hey, isn't it the case that where he teaches ??? and leading ??? To exclude ??? Yehudah for he said: until that it should be ??? Come and hear from this. that even ??? also ??? If so, ??? two that were ??? between ??? between ??? that it is possible one trapping of that is not ??? that it is possible that they said ??? and there are that they said ??? from the end of the teaching: ??? -- this refers to he bought ??? -- this refers to ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? If so, we were R' Yehudah There is this difference between them: trapping of one that is not he bought ??? that they said ??? and there are that they said ??? Come and hear: one ??? a donkey and one ??? this he bought a donkey and this he bought ??? Learn from this ??? Here in this case, also, ??? If so, ??? also ??? I would say this he bought a donkey ??? and this he bought ??? This is satisfactory ??? for him son of the understanding of except ??? in what way ??? I would say this he bought a donkey completely ??? and this ??? Just as ??? in his hand This What then does it mean when it says if ??? to say ??? a lost object to his fellow he bought his fellow What case is he dealing with? in a case that he came ??? for him with the intent ??? This with the intent that are his ??? for him ??? No. ??? Rav Ashi said this he bought a donkey the house of ??? and this he bought Just as ??? in his hand ??? No. he bought No. this and not this Rabbi Abahu he said In reality lit: In the world ??? Because It is possible ??? opposite him. Hey, isn't it the case that For R' ??? She For if it was No. you say thus ??? that it ??? half of it atop ??? and half of it atop ??? came one ??? half of it from by regarding ??? and someone else came ??? half of it from by regarding ??? Here, too, ??? and that was last No. ??? Because It is possible ??? opposite him. but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For R' ??? She Come and hear: R' Eliezer says: ??? in the field and leading ??? in the city he bought Here in this case, also, leading ??? ??? If so, we were leading ??? two kinds of leading ??? If so, ??? in the city What is the reason? No. ??? Rav said ??? because it is not their way of people ??? in the city He said to him: Rav Ashi for Rav, ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? on Shabbat where it is not their way of people ??? on Shabbat Here, too, that is not ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? a slave ??? Here in this case, also, What then does it mean when it says ??? a slave ??? except ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) for he said: for him ??? like the way when people ???

דף ט,ב גמרא

and if is a voluntary act the public he ??? and if a person ??? he ??? and if a woman She ??? and if ??? he ??? he is required R' Elazar One who says to his fellow straight livestock -- this refers to ??? vessels ??? What then? ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? for him ??? except straight livestock -- this refers to ??? vessels ??? What then? who ??? vessels or did not say Raba If it was He said to him: ??? livestock ??? vessels who ??? vessels a courtyward ??? She and a courtyward ??? No. he bought And if you say ??? Hey, isn't it the case that all ??? walking No. he bought ??? who dwells No. he bought And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? And they said to him Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua to Raba Except I can object with text from here: One who was walking ??? ??? fish ??? a ship Here, too, ??? She and not ??? He said to him: ??? he that he came ??? to it He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi Except I can object with text from here: it was ??? in a public domain In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- to it writ ??? or ??? Here in this case, also, that is not ??? He said to him ??? that he came ???

דף ט,ב משנה

One who was riding atop livestock and he saw a lost object and he said to his fellow give it to me but his fellow picked it up and took it and he said "I I take possession of it" the latter successfully took possession of it if once he had given it to him i.e., the second person picked up the object, gave it to the rider, and only subsequently he said "I I took possession of it first" then he did not say anything at all.

דף ט,ב גמרא

It was taught there: who ??? ??? and he said Behold! This is ??? Responded R' Eliezer says: took possession to him But the sages say: ??? Ulla said he said R' Yehoshua son of Levi It is a disagreement ??? of Rabbi Eliezer reasoned ??? So if he wished, ??? you shall Responded and he will see for him now also Look, for him ??? for his own sake ??? also ??? And the rabbbis reason that one ??? say two ??? we do not say but: ??? the words of all are took possession to him ??? for his own sake ??? also ??? He said to him: Rav ??? and let us say, Master, ??? It is a disagreement for it is the case that a lost object The entirety ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: One who was riding atop livestock and he saw a lost object and he said to his fellow give it to me raised up i.e., separated and he said I my ruling that a person is innocent? of it took possession of it If you say, This is satisfactory ??? It is a disagreement

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.