It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צא,א גמרא

No. ??? permission ??? except ??? ??? He said to him So, with whom does it agree? it is R' Yehudah for he said: Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? upon it and who seeks ??? to it like R' Yehudah Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: But the beginning of the teaching, The entirety ??? one ??? and one the women and we were at of it The entirety it uses these particular words to include what? to include ??? that is not like R' Yehudah For if it was like Rabbi Yehudah Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say he does not ??? he does not "This is a support a Tanna taught: derive it ??? upon it ??? The Rabbis taught ??? ??? of it ??? and He will take restitution for four ??? and three ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he does not ??? did he die and does not ??? and He will take restitution for Abayye said: So, with whom does it agree? ??? She for he said: ??? and He will take restitution for Rava said: ??? Torah and even came on of its mother Rav Papa said, ??? to it ??? No. ??? until ??? Rav Pappa said: What case is he dealing with? They asked ??? of the academy of Rav ??? son of Abba ??? them ??? one ??? and one ??? They asked ??? What then? ??? ??? them ??? as it is taught: yes. ??? ??? and if kneading all the bread All of it forbidden because of ??? transgression one like it; yes. ??? the oven ??? and if ??? all the bread All of it forbidden until ??? the oven And the other one They asked ??? What then? ??? but when it is not ??? them ??? for Shmuel said: ??? until ??? like the way ??? until ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? son of Ami Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said (Lev. 19) ??? No. ??? I was says No. ??? a person ??? at the hour ??? upon it male, Scripture states: ??? Is this not from this general principle it would follow ??? also No. What then does it mean when it says ??? But why? a seminal emission to it ??? as a euphemism lit., as elevated tongue Rav Yehudah said ??? is permitted. ??? and even It is because of this: ??? there is not in this case. What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? agitated He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? son of Ami

דף צא,ב גמרא

Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said (Lev. 19) ??? No. ??? I was says No. ??? a person ??? so that ??? upon it male, Therefore, scripture states: ??? he ??? this one ??? Sarai ??? also ??? yes. ??? No. What then does it mean when it says ??? But why? a seminal emission for him ??? as a euphemism lit., as elevated tongue Rav Ashi said this one the validity They asked ??? of the academy of Rav ??? What then? ??? but when it is not ??? immediately That there are of him according to of him ??? or, perhaps, even thus No. ??? them ??? that is not ??? It is because of this: ???

דף צא,ב משנה

would make ??? but not ??? but not ??? even ??? Behold! this he eats R' Yosi ??? Yehudah says until ???

דף צא,ב גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא (Deut. 23) For ??? in all What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says until ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of R' Yosi ??? Yehudah For ox Just as ox until ??? Even ??? until ??? he is required Rabbah the son of Rav Huna threshing ??? to R' ??? Yehudah What then? in all his strength in the case of And this is present here. or, perhaps, ??? in the case of And that is absent here The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah workers? before it was even the case that ??? two and evening ??? they eat grapes And there is no meaning to the word they drink wine ??? two and evening ??? they eat grapes and they drink wine

דף צא,ב משנה

would make ??? does not eat ??? does not eat ??? but: ??? himself until ??? to the place ??? and eats and all of them Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except in the hour of work but: It is because of this: ??? a lost item ??? And they said ??? they eat ??? from ???

דף צא,ב גמרא

They posed this difficulty: makes ??? this What then? ??? after ??? that you he gives ??? of the master of the house in the case of And this is present here. or, perhaps, ??? that you he gives ??? of the master of the house in the case of And that is absent here and if you seek to say makes ??? this does not eat ??? after ox that is connected in what way does ??? Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This ??? Come and hear: would make ??? does not eat ??? this one figs and figs is equivalent ??? and grapes he eats And if you say makes ??? this he does not he eats ??? after in what way does It concerns itself Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This ??? Come and hear: but: ??? himself until ??? to the place ??? and eats And if you say makes ??? this he eats ??? after ??? there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? work No. ??? to us For ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? to us in a case That there are his wife and his children What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: and all of them Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except in the hour of work but: because of ??? a lost item ??? And they said workers? ??? from ??? walking ??? It once happened he is equivalent. but on account of ??? a lost item ??? he ??? according to Torah law, No. ??? Perhaps, makes ??? this he does not he eats ??? after No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you makes ??? this he eats ??? after walking Is this not ??? It once happened he is equivalent. that it is possible that they said ??? walking Is this not ??? It once happened he is equivalent. And this is like the position The reason is ??? No. ??? It is because of this: ??? It once happened he is equivalent. this one makes It once happened ??? according to Torah law, Perhaps, makes ??? this he eats ??? after No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you makes ??? this he does not he eats ??? after

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.