It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צד,א גמרא

thus in the same way thus in the same way men that it is possible ??? thus in the same way thus in the same way ??? that it is possible ??? thus in the same way thus in the same way ??? to us and He went ??? of him What then does it mean when it says He said to him Behold! ??? to the place ??? raw lit., living ???

דף צד,א משנה

gifts ??? although we don't deserve it. to be is exempt ??? to be is exempt ??? the reward for ??? to be are exempt ??? all ??? on Just as ??? in the Torah ??? wasted and all ??? in which there is It once happened ??? wasted and all for whom it is possible ??? with it ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived

דף צד,א גמרא

why is it that gifts on Just as ??? in the Torah he and all ??? on Just as ??? in the Torah ??? wasted So, with whom does it agree? it is R' Yehudah for he said: In the matter ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived as it is taught: One who says ??? Behold! ??? for me in order that do not ??? by the the remainder of ??? and answer Behold! This is ??? wasted These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah says In the matter ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived and who seeks ??? to it like R' Yehudah I would say at the end of the teaching, all ??? on Just as ??? in the Torah ??? wasted ??? According to Rabbi Meir, This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction In reality lit: In the world it is R' Yehudah and at the end of the teaching, In the matter that is not of money or property I would say at the end of the teaching, all ??? in which there is in it It once happened ??? wasted one ??? for him is what he has this one reason out the logic. ??? as it is taught: Abba ??? a man ??? he said It is because of this: ??? before ??? Behold! this ??? It once happened before ??? he does not ??? except All of it ??? She that I Here in this case, originally No. ??? a Tanna taught: gifts ??? the reward for to be ??? in what way regarding items Shmuel said ??? And R' Yochanan said: even you say ??? benefit that was coming out for him ??? he ??? and all for whom it is possible ??? Rav said ??? Rav said these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah son of you say but: Watch out for leading vav But the sages say: despite the fact where it is not possible to him ??? upon it ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived as it is taught: Behold! this ??? in order ??? in order ??? he bought of hundred cubits in order ??? the Great Sea the Mediterranean ??? Behold! this writ No. ??? he does not writ Rabbi Yehudah son of you say says ??? writ A general principle: R' Yehudah said: son of you say all where it is not possible to him ??? upon it ??? he does not except ??? and is valid Rav Nachman said Rav said "The halacha is like Rabbi Yehudah son of you say Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? also ??? where he teaches all for whom it is possible ??? upon it ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived this one it would be impossible to him ??? wasted Learn from this

דף צד,א משנה

??? ??? and He asked ??? or the reward for ??? He asked ??? or their reward. and after this He asked ??? is exempt as it is said (Ex. 22) if ??? with it No. ???

דף צד,ב משנה

but: He asked ??? and after this He asked ??? or their reward. ??? he is liable as it is said (Ex. 22) ??? yes. with it ???

דף צד,ב גמרא

When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, and after this He asked ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching where he teaches ??? actually and really ??? actually and really who It concerns itself a cow ??? If you wish, I would say For example, ??? a cow ??? that is not ??? If you wish, I would say for he said: for him ??? No. ??? until ??? It was taught there: four "they stood watch" are these ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? although we don't deserve it. "on has sworn The entirety ??? must make restitution The entirety ??? the reward for ??? on ??? and on the female captive and on ??? the lost item and ??? From where in Tanach do we know this? For the Rabbis taught parasha (scriptural section) the first ??? the second ??? the reward for the third ??? This is satisfactory the third ??? (Ex. 22) And so ??? a man ??? his neighbor ??? or did he die ??? yes. with it ??? except the first ??? although we don't deserve it. the second ??? the reward for ??? I ??? the second ??? the reward for which provides he is liable ??? a lost item ??? the first ??? the reward for which provides must make restitution restitutions for ??? claims ??? even thus ??? without ??? is preferable, ??? Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: for it is the case that he asks all benefit are his and does not must make restitution except the principal amount ??? all benefit are his Hey, isn't it the case that ??? food; ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? And if you wish, I would say No. you say all benefit are his except I would say most of benefit are his And if you wish, I would say ??? vessels ??? the reward for ??? on ??? and on the female captive and on ??? the lost item and ??? This is satisfactory ??? As it is written (Ex. 22) if he steals ??? except a lost item What is our source for this claim as it is taught: if he steals ??? yes. for me except ??? a lost item from where do we learn Scripture states: if he steals ??? from all a place This is satistfactory for one for he said: we do not say ??? Torah ??? people except for one for he said: say ??? Torah ??? people What is there to say? In the west, they said ??? for just as ??? must make restitution a lost item ??? is it not all the more so? And the other one the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read ??? must make restitution The entirety This is satisfactory ??? As it is written (Ex. 22) And so ??? a man ??? his neighbor ??? or did he die except female captive ??? What is our source for this claim And if you say let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? with the intent he shall you say ??? which provides ??? that is not ??? with the intent he except ??? ??? the reward for Just as there female captive with it Even here, female captive with it that it is possible ??? Just as ??? the reward for which provides ??? shall you say ??? which provides ??? except ??? he gave as it is taught: R' Natan says: or ??? female captive This or ??? for him ??? until ??? No. he is obligated Come and learn from this. This is satistfactory to R' ??? except to R' ??? What is there to say? as it is taught: (Lev. 20) a man who ??? his father and of its mother yes. for me except his father and his mother his father without of its mother of its mother without his father from where do we learn Scripture states: his father and his mother ??? his father ??? of its mother ??? these are the words of Rabbi ??? Rabbi ??? says ??? both ??? one alone by itself

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.