It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף י,א גמרא

so-and-so came on ??? he and after combine together ??? but not ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear from this ??? we were ??? What would you have said? a person ??? next to himself say next to his wife we do not say Come and hear from this Rabba said: so-and-so came on ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? money or property Watch out for leading vav or his daughter of so-and-so ??? money or property money or property to this and souls to this Rabba said: so-and-so ??? the ox ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? money or property ??? of so-and-so ??? money or property money or property to this and souls to this this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have we were ??? It is because of this: that he came he is required ??? who seeks Raba so-and-so ??? What then? who say a person ??? next to himself And there is no meaning to the word a person ??? next to ??? or perhaps, say a person ??? next to ??? according to ??? he returns ??? a person ??? next to himself And there is no meaning to the word a person ??? next to ??? in a case where there are three ??? words Rav Huna said Scripture states: (Deut. 25) ??? two And there is no meaning to the word a court ??? they add upon them any more one Behold! here, three Except I can object with text from here: (Deut. 25) ??? two ??? two Behold! here, seven This certain individual should bring himself ??? for he said: ??? from the Torah ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Deut. 19) as it was ??? except ??? As it is written (Deut. 19) ??? ??? the wicked, It is because of this: ??? ??? the wicked, and it was the case that if son of ??? the wicked, except witnesses ??? ??? and they came ??? ??? originally ??? the wicked ones and it was the case that if son of ??? the wicked, Is it not enough for him (Ex. 20) fill ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not in which is not It once happened and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? It is because of this: R' Yishmael And they said ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Yishmael Abayye said: We come to compare a wicked person a wicked person ??? It is written here (Deut. 25) and it was the case that if son of ??? the wicked, And it is written there (Num. 35) who he a wicked person "of death, Just as there ??? and three Even here, ??? and three Rava said: ??? in a place death is standing Rav Acha said the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi If so, ??? why do I have ??? and if ??? in the days of He said to him Scripture states: (Deut. 25) ??? your brother ??? For ??? Watch out for leading vav So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: ??? twenty yes. ??? that specific except ??? and how much time is the duration of there are. ???

דף י,ב גמרא

??? twenty and one And so ??? one in the days of for it is the case that For ??? He said to him: Scripture states: (Deut. 25) ??? your brother ??? after ??? your brother ??? No. The tanna teaches: kiddush No. The tanna teaches: except ??? No. ??? and ipso facto ??? Abayye said: It was taught by kiddush ??? Another teaching is like this: kiddush ??? the year in a case where there are three these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabba said: Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: except Rabba said: kiddush by day ??? in a case where there are three after ??? there is not in this case. kiddush with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer ??? She as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer ??? says if No. ??? yes. ??? that specific immediately ??? spices Rav ??? he said kiddush after ??? in a case where there are three by day ??? there is not in this case. kiddush with whom does it agree? ??? She as it is taught: ??? says ??? yes. ??? that specific that did not have ??? that specific Rav Ashi said: In reality lit: In the world ??? The tanna teaches: And what does it mean when it says ??? year" a Tanna taught: also ??? There is no kiddus ??? No. with whom does it agree? R' Eliezer She as it is taught: R' Eliezer says: between ??? between that did not have ??? yes. ??? that specific as it is said (Lev. 25) ??? ??? year" two you make kiddush. and if you make kiddush. ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says in a case where there are three ??? It was taught: How so? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel in a case where there are three do they begin and in five raise ??? and They complete in the week one says ??? and two say that did not have ??? wasted an individual ??? two say ??? and one says that did not have ??? they add upon them any more two and raise ??? In the matter two say it requires and three say It is not it requires ??? two ??? three say it requires and two say It is not it requires they add upon them any more two that do not ??? less than ??? Behold! three five and seven correspond to lit., are opposite what? They disagreed about this, Rabbi Isaac son of Nachmeni and one ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi: And there are those who say it was Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi: and one ??? R' Isaac son of Nachmeni One says opposite the blessing of the priests and one says three opposite those who guard ??? five ??? the face of the king seven ??? the face of the king Rav Yosef learned: Behold! three and five and seven three opposite those who guard ??? five ??? the face of the king seven ??? the face of the king He said to him Abaye According to Rav Yosef until ??? What is the reason? No. ??? to us Master, Thus said them It was not ??? who ??? the validity and they do not say ??? time ??? It is necessary for him ??? The Rabbis taught yes. ??? the year except

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.