Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף טו,א גמרא
One who says ??? implements of this by the he gives ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא a person know that do not ??? and he said ??? It is because of this: thus he gives ??? This ??? of ??? for him It was taught by ??? of ??? Rav Chisda he said ??? This ??? of ??? should bring himself It was taught by ??? of ??? Rabbi Abahu he said in the case of one who says ??? by the came a priest ??? from him ??? in a case where there are three ??? in a case where there are ten He said to him: Rav Acha ??? This is satisfactory To exclude ??? in the case of three except ??? three why do I have He said to him reason out the logic. he What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא perhaps, ??? also perhaps, ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? He said to him Rav ??? This is satisfactory according to R' Yehudah it is written a priest except According to the sages, a priest For what reason them ??? nine ??? words Shmuel said ten priests ??? one ??? you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? that even ??? Israel and one a priest He disagreed with this Rav Huna the son of of Rav he gave I would say five priests and five ??? a person ??? a person who ??? he said R' Abahu in the case of one who says he is equivalent. by the as it is taught: One who says he is equivalent. by the ??? that specific ??? and a slave ??? he is required Rabbi Avin: the gate ??? he is equivalent. and in a case where there are three or ??? he is equivalent. and in a case where there are ten Come and hear: ??? his male slave the laws of misappropriation do not apply Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? to us ??? Learn from this Let him say Behold! ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Meir says: there are items that are ??? and are not ??? And there is no meaning to the word the sages "We thank..." to him How so? ten vines ??? to you ??? says are not except ??? R' Meir he is obligated but the sages say all ??? to the earth Behold! he ??? and he said Rabbi Yosei son of ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that Is this not ??? No. even you say R' Meir Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Meir there i.e., in another mishna all how much ??? them ??? but: ??? all how much ??? them ??? souls ??? interrupt It was taught by They did not teach this לא שנו ??? male, and They did not teach this לא שנו ??? female This is satisfactory ??? female As it is written (Lev. 20) ??? the his wife and ??? except ??? male, What is our source for this claim As it is written (Ex. 22) all who lay with livestock shall certainly die" if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? the Merciful One ??? who lay ??? Just as who lay he and his animal ??? and three Even ??? he and his animal ??? ox ??? as it is said (Ex. 21) the ox ??? also ??? thus in the same way ??? He said to him Abaye to Raba Watch out for leading vav And from where do you have it that also ??? thus in the same way ??? the ox he who has arrived
דף טו,ב גמרא
I would say ??? he who has arrived If so, ??? also ??? If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: thus then I might incorrectly say: by stoning, by stoning, ??? by stoning, and perhaps, This ??? the Merciful One ??? To exclude ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? a donkey except for one for he said: ??? What is there to say? Don't let it enter your mind! As it is written (Ex. 21) if ??? upon it And if it enters your mind to argue that son of ??? he For it is written (Num. 35) No. ??? It is because of this: She ??? No. ??? for him ??? except ??? except he said ??? and thus was taught of the academy of Hezekiyah said: he read (Num. 35) shall certainly die" ??? he on ??? you ??? and if you ??? on ??? They posed this difficulty: ox ??? who ??? hour ??? or No. Come and hear: for it teaches: pointed out a contradiction. son of ??? (Ex. 19) if livestock if a man No. ??? Just as a man ??? Even livestock ??? the lion, ??? he said Reish Lakish: This is only in the case ??? but not ??? No. Perhaps, his reasoning is there is regarding them an upbringing of and there is regarding them ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: despite the fact that did not have ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is they do not have an upbringing of and they do not have ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Eliezer says: all ??? took possession This is satisfactory to R' Yochanan for what took possession took possession ??? except ??? for what took possession immediately ??? The rabbis established like who ??? benefit ??? What then does it mean when it says took possession took possession to heaven. This teaching is consistent with the position ??? one ox ??? and one livestock raw lit., living ??? R' Eliezer says: ox ??? and three but the remainder of livestock raw lit., living ??? all ??? took possession of them ??? Rabbi Akiva says: ??? Rabbi Akiva we were Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna There is this difference between them: ??? yes. ??? This ??? in what way Shall I say ??? the Sabbath I will say ??? the Merciful One between ??? in the matter of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry in the remainder of the commandments who ??? except ??? This comes to imply ??? for many people ??? for him like who No. like Rabbi ??? and not like Rabbi ??? as it is taught: up to how much doing a city ??? and until ??? these are the words of Rabbi ??? Rabbi ??? says ??? and until the majority of his body of ??? and even R' ??? he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: except the majority of his body but: all of it did not say Rav Matanah: Here in this case,
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.