PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ב,א משנה

??? in a case where there are three thefts ??? in a case where there are three damage ??? damage restitutions for ??? and restitutions for four and five in a case where there are three ??? and the taking out in that place evil" in a case where there are three These are the words of Rabbi Meir. But the sages say: sent forth in that place evil" ??? and three because of in which there is in it ??? souls ??? in a case where there are three It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael And they said ??? and three ??? in a case where there are three ??? the year in a case where there are three These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says in a case where there are three do they begin and in five raise ??? and They complete in the week and if ??? elders ??? wagon in a case where there are three these are the words of R' Shimon R' Yehuda says: in five ??? in a case where there are three planted ??? and second tithe that do not ??? in a case where there are three ??? in a case where there are three ??? in a case where there are three R' Yehuda says: one from them a priest ??? nine and a priest a person is subject to the same laws as them ??? ??? souls ??? and three ??? and three as it is said (Lev. 20) ??? the his wife and ??? And it is said: and ??? ox ??? and three as it is said (Ex. 21) the ox ??? also ??? thus in the same way ??? the ox ??? and the lion, ??? and three Rabbi Eliezer says: all ??? took possession Rabbi Akiva says: ??? yes. ??? not ??? and not prophet ??? and not the high priest except by the mouth of a court of ??? and one and We do not bring out ??? freedom except by the mouth of a court of ??? and one yes. they add on the city and on ??? except by the mouth of a court of ??? and one Watch out for leading vav And we do not make ??? except by the mouth of a court of ??? and one Watch out for leading vav And we do not make a city ??? except by the mouth of a court of ??? and one Watch out for leading vav And we do not make a city ??? in the book and not three but: doing One or two the Sanhedrin that is large it was of ??? and one and a small one of twenty and three from where do we learn ??? that it of ??? and one as it is said (Num. 11) ??? for me ??? a man ??? Israel Moses on ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? And from where do we learn ??? that it of twenty and three as it is said (Num. 35) ??? Behold! here, twenty And from where do we learn ??? that it ten as it is said (Num. 14) until when ??? the evil ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah Joshua ??? And from where do we learn ??? any more three ??? as it is said (Ex. 23) No. ??? "After many ??? listen I ??? with them ??? If so, why is it said "After many ??? No. ??? by the mouth of one ??? by the mouth of two

דף ב,ב משנה

And there is no meaning to the word a court ??? they add upon them any more one Behold! here, twenty and three and how much time is the duration of ??? in the city and shall be ??? hundred and twenty Rabbi ??? says two hundred and thirty opposite Sarai ???

דף ב,ב גמרא

because thefts ??? Is this not ??? he said Rabbi Abahu Just as there are. The tanna teaches: Just as there are. ??? thefts ??? but: ??? No. And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was a Tanna taught: ??? then I might incorrectly say: for even in the case where ??? a Tanna taught: thefts ??? and if a Tanna taught: thefts ??? and not The tanna teaches: ??? then I might incorrectly say: it is the law that even ??? and This case where he teaches thefts ??? It is because of this: ??? three ??? are written thefts As it is written (Ex. 22) ??? the master of the house to God ??? What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from ??? a Tanna taught: Just as there are. ??? thefts ??? but: ??? No. and for what Shall I say that is not in the case of three For didn't Rabbi Abahu say two ??? according to the words of The entirety yes. ??? judgement except that is not in the case of ??? What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is ??? It is written here, that also should request ??? And if his reasoning is yes. ??? It is written here, three why do I have In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is ??? It is written here, In justice, he ??? also ??? and that one that is not in the case of ??? It is because of this: of Rabbi ??? for he said: Rabbi ??? So says the Torah. one ??? and one ??? souls ???