It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

(I Chron. 29) ??? to Hashem ??? There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? to him ??? his brothers? Even ??? to him ??? his brothers? ??? From where do we derive this? as it is taught: Rabbi says (Lev. 24) it was ??? and to his children ??? to his children

דף כא,א משנה

(Deut. 17) No. ??? to him women except the Eighteen i.e., the Amidah Rabbi Yehudah says ??? he to him but only that it shall not be ??? his heart R' Shimon says even One ??? his heart Behold! this No. ??? If so, why is it said No. ??? to him women that even ???

דף כא,א גמרא

This comes to imply with R' Yehudah he expounds. The reason is ??? and Rabbi Shimon No. he expounds. The reason is ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? them as it is taught: a widow between that it ??? between that it ??? yes. ??? it as it is said (Deut. 24) No. ??? a widow these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Shimon says: ??? it ??? yes. ??? it And you, he is liable to turn to it And you, ??? in that place evil" ??? say What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: from the midst of that you ??? you he is liable to turn to it And you, ??? in that place evil" ??? Perhaps, R' Yehudah No. he expounds. The reason is ??? and Rabbi Shimon he expounds. The reason is ??? in reality Rabbi Yehudah No. he expounds. The reason is ??? that I Here in this case, whose reason was explained exegetically ??? What is the reason? No. ??? to him women It is because of this: (Deut. 17) that is not ??? and R' Shimon He could say to you ??? in reality ??? The reason is ??? If so, to write he read No. ??? to him women ??? and I I thought to say What is the reason? No. ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? No. ??? why do I have even One ??? his heart Behold! This is No. ??? except Just as I is fulfilled lit. is stood up No. ??? that even ??? Behold! eighteen From where do we derive this? As it is written (II Sam 3) ??? of David children" ??? And it was ??? Keli'av ??? a fool ??? Avshalom son of ??? son of ??? son of ??? David ??? of David ??? and he said for him prophet (II Sam 12) if ??? to you ??? Six ??? Six where they did them ??? He disagreed with this Ravina I would say ??? both ??? and four Another teaching is like this: No. ??? to him women -- more than twenty and four for one who derives an explanation from ??? forty and eight are they, Another teaching is like this: No. ??? to him women -- more ??? and eight and it was taught ??? What is his reason Rav said ??? There is an analogy between ??? that was last ??? that came first Just as ??? that came first Six Even ??? that was last Six Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rav said wagon -- this refers to ??? and for what reason is called her name wagon ??? upon it ??? And thus it says (Judges 14) ??? etc. and who are they, ??? My son, For it is written (II Sam 6) ??? the daughter of the grave No. he was to it ??? until day ??? Rav Chisdah said until day ??? No. he was to it by day ??? he was to it ??? children" in a case ??? He accounts for them ??? And even It once happened ??? in Jerusalem it was. As it is written (II Sam 5) ??? the daughter of the grave ??? the king David ??? before Hashem ??? and Rav Yehudah said (and there are those who say Rav Yosef ??? except I would say until that specific It once happened he was to it from here and onwards No. he was to it For it is written (II Sam 5) ??? David any more ??? women in Jerusalem ??? ten What then does it mean when it says women And what does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said women ??? without her ketuba and without ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said four hundred ??? they were to him of David and all of them My son, ??? they were ??? they were and all of them they sit ??? of gold and walking ??? they were and they they were ??? of the house of David and Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? the daughter of ??? it was as it is said (II Sam 13) "And now, a thing please, ??? the king For No. ??? from you And if it enters your mind to argue that the daughter of nisuin the sanctification of the marriage ??? who it was. ??? for him except Learn from this the daughter of ??? it was (II Sam 13) ??? evil" was his name ??? son of ??? my brother David ??? a man wise etc. Rav Yehudah said Rav said a man wise ??? (II Sam 13) and he said Why you ??? son of the king and he said to him ??? he lay down on ??? etc. until ??? ??? (II Sam 13) ??? before him Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? to him varieties of ??? (II Sam 13) ??? that is large ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא he said R' Isaac Let him say ??? to him ??? And so ??? to him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? except I would say ??? to him Let him say ??? Really? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Raba What then does it mean that it is written (Ezek. 17) and went out to you in that place ??? that do not to them ??? Israel No. the gate the house of ??? and not the house of ??? that I ??? (II Sam 13) ??? on her head ??? who upon it ??? a Tanna taught: in the name of R' Yehoshua son of ??? hedge The greatness ??? At that very hour And they said ??? kings thus in the same way ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! if ??? thus in the same way ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! Rav Yehudah said Rav said At that very hour ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

on ??? and on ??? a law established by the Torah he for he said: R' Yochanan It is because of this: R' Shimon son of ??? from the Torah ??? as it is said (Deut. 13) For ??? your brother son of ??? And so son of if ??? son of ??? he does not ??? except to say to you son of ??? with of its mother And there is no meaning to the word after ??? with all ??? except I would say ??? on ??? (I Kings 1) ??? son of ??? saying: I ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said This teaches ??? and not ??? (I Kings 1) ??? to him ??? a man ??? before him What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said all of them ??? pilgrimage festivals they were

דף כא,ב משנה

No. ??? to him ??? except so that ??? silver and gold No. ??? to him greatly except so that to give ??? written to him a Torah scroll ??? he would exit ??? enter he ??? with it who dwells In justice, She with it is reclining She opposite him as it is said (Deut. 17) it was with it and he read in it all my days: ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: (Deut. 17) No. ??? to him ??? It is possible even so that ??? Therefore, scripture states: to him to him he does not ??? but: ??? he so that ??? So how am I to resolve that ??? for even if ??? This is only in the case wasted that he was without ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 17) so that ??? And so based on this lit: from after, that even ??? one This is only in the case wasted he arises without ??? why do I have to cross over ??? on all ??? The reason is ??? the Merciful One to him this one Is this not thus ??? even so that ??? also No. it is not necessary to teach this ??? (Deut. 17) silver and gold No. ??? to him except so that to give ??? The Rabbis taught (Deut. 17) silver and gold No. ??? to him It is possible even so that to give ??? Scripture states: to him to him he does not ??? but: ??? he so that to give ??? The reason is ??? the Merciful One to him this one Is this not thus then I might incorrectly say: even so that to give ??? also No. it is not necessary to teach this ??? now that you said to him ??? (Deut. 17) No. ??? to him women What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. ??? Rav Yehudah pointed out a contradiction. it is written (I Kings 4) And it was ??? forty ??? and then it is written (II Chron. 9) And it was ??? thousands ??? How so? if forty ??? they were Each and every one they were in it four thousands ??? and if four thousands ??? they were Each and every one they were in it forty ??? Isaac pointed out a contradiction. it is written (II Chron. 9) yes. silver ??? in the days of Solomon ??? and then it is written (I Kings 11) He shall give" ??? ??? in Jerusalem ??? There is no difficulty. here, before ??? Solomon the daughter of Pharaoh here, after ??? Solomon the daughter of Pharaoh Rabbi Yitzchak said at the hour ??? Solomon the daughter of Pharaoh He descended Gavriel ??? he bought in the sea and raised up ??? And about him ??? The greatness ??? and he said R' Isaac On account of what No. ??? they would taste Torah for behold! two ??? of them The greatness the world. it is written (Deut. 17) No. ??? to him women he said Solomon I ??? and not is forbidden and then it is written (I Kings 11) And it was in the time of ??? Solomon ??? ??? and then it is written (Deut. 17) No. ??? to him ??? and he said Solomon I ??? and not I shall cause to return and then it is written (I Kings 11) ??? the Chariot, from Egypt. ??? written a Torah scroll ??? a Tanna taught: but only that did not have ??? he said ??? even though ??? to him ??? to a person a Torah scroll a commandment to write of his. as it is said (Deut. 31) "And now, ??? to you ??? Abaye written to him a Torah scroll ??? that did not have ??? others a king yes. ??? No. it is not necessary to teach this to have two ??? and As it is taught: (Deut. 17) "and the writing of to him ??? etc. written ??? two ??? One that it ??? and did you enter with it and one ??? to him in the house of ??? it ??? and did you enter with it ??? it ??? as it is said (Ps. 16) ??? Hashem ??? The Tamid-offering For ??? he does not enter of it No. to the bathhouse and not ??? the seat as it is said (Deut. 17) it was with it and he read in it a place ??? in it Mar Zutra said: (and there are those who say Master, ??? at the beginning ??? Torah to Israel in writing ??? to them in the days of Ezra in writing Ashurit Assyrian??? ??? to them to Israel the writing of Ashurit Assyrian??? ??? the writing of ??? one ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? What then does it mean when it says the writing of ??? Rav Chisdah said the writing of ??? It was taught: Rabbi Yosei says: ??? he was Ezra ??? Torah on ??? to Israel ??? Moses ??? he says (Ex. 19) Moses He ascended to God ??? he says (Ezra 7) he Ezra He ascended ??? Just as ??? is said here, Torah Even ??? is said there Torah ??? he says (Deut. 4) ??? Hashem In an hour of this particular to teach you ??? he says (Ezra 7) For Ezra ??? ??? Hashem ??? and to do and to teach ??? and statute" and even though that did not have ??? Torah on ??? on ??? as it is said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.