It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

until ??? Abaye said at the end of eating, before they leave he ??? And Rabba said ??? he ??? Abaye said at the end of eating, before they leave he ??? a wicked person he and the Torah he said (Ex. 23) to ??? your hand. with a wicked person to ??? a wicked person until Rava said: ??? he ??? until ??? he What then does it mean when it says ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? yes. to you in it except ??? that it is possible that they said Raba also ??? he reasons for himself. And what does it mean when it says ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: from here ??? It is because of this: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? among two it is dealing with a case where there is only one. So, too, ??? and he said R' ??? a slave Rav ??? of Raba Master, son of Rav Ashi said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? he eats ??? the words of all are is invalid, ??? Abaye said is invalid, Rava said: is valid Abaye said is invalid, that he has i.e., that he is expected a wicked person and the Merciful One he said to ??? a wicked person until And Rabba said is valid a wicked person ??? in the case of They challenged him from this teaching: to ??? a wicked person until to ??? until these ??? they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? Is this not one ??? without worth and one ??? money or property No. This and this ??? money or property And what does it mean when it says oaths oaths of the world They challenged him from this teaching: to ??? a wicked person until to ??? until these ??? Let him say ??? until ??? is invalid, for all the Torah All of it these are the words of Rabbi Meir R' Yosei says In what matters are we saying this? ??? souls but: ??? is valid ??? souls Let him say Abaye like Rabbi Meir and Raba like Rabbi Yosi Abaye like Rabbi Meir for he said: say ??? and Raba for he said: like Rabbi Yosi for he said: ??? say ??? we do not say No. who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi ??? does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Meir Abaye like Rabbi Meir and Raba Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna except regarding until ??? to heaven. evil" from those who have been created But here, in this case, ??? to heaven. And there is no meaning to the word evil" from those who have been created No. And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this particular It is Rabbi Yosei ??? also R' Yosi ??? and R' Yosi the halacha is like R' Yosi It is different there in that case ??? to us a Tanna taught: like Rabbi ??? in a case ??? to us This is like a thing Chama ??? He said to him: ??? for Rav, Abba son of Ya'akov ??? of it If it was certainly ??? they came two ??? of him. ??? He went ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it two ??? of him. it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? One says ??? and one says ???

דף כז,ב גמרא

??? He said to him What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbi Meir and Rabbi Yosei, The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi and Rabbi Yosei, Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say is valid ??? souls He said to him: Rav ??? What case is he dealing with? in a case that is not ??? to us a Tanna taught: like Rabbi ??? Here in this case, ??? to us a Tanna taught: like Rabbi ??? From where can you derive Shall I say ??? For it was taught in a baraita all ??? souls ??? with whom does it agree? Shall I say It is Rabbi Yosei Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. until ??? souls is invalid, ??? except Is this not Rabbi Meir She From where can you derive perhaps, ??? he arises For if it was No. you say thus at the end of the teaching, where he teaches there are ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? souls why is it that he does not ??? souls ??? Hey, isn't it the case that the words of all are is invalid, he except ??? he arises So, here, ??? he arises except Here in this case, ??? to us a Tanna taught: For it was taught in a baraita These are ??? with usurious interest ??? This is the general rule: all giving witness that do not the his wife ??? to it Even there are. yes. are proper to it with whom does it agree? Shall I say Rabbi Yosei ??? giving witness ??? souls that do not the his wife is valid to it there are. are proper to it except Is this not Rabbi Meir She he stood son of Chama ??? the second

דף כז,ב משנה

and they are ??? and my brother his father and my brother of its mother and the master of ??? and the master of ??? his father and the master of ??? of its mother and the master of of its mother ??? there are. ??? R' Yosi said -- this refers to ??? Rabbi Akiva but: ??? the first ??? son of ??? and all ??? and all ??? to him At that very hour he was ??? behold! This is הרי זה is valid Rabbi Yehudah says even ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter and he has children" from it Behold! this ??? loves this ??? all that did not have a thing with it three days ??? He said to him No. ??? Israel on thus in the same way

דף כז,ב גמרא

??? words ??? (Deut. 24) No. ??? the forefathers on children" Just as Scripture states: if to teach that did not have it shall be left to die of natural causes the forefathers ??? children" And lack of children ??? the forefathers Behold! Already it is said (Deut. 24) a man ??? except No. ??? the forefathers on children" ??? children" And lack of children No. ??? on the forefathers ??? the forefathers And lack of children ??? the forefathers No. For it is written (Ex. 34) ??? iniquity the forefathers on children" there i.e., in another mishna ??? It once happened ??? As it is taught: (Lev. 26) And even ??? "You ??? It once happened ??? You say ??? Or perhaps, except ??? are grasping For as it says: a man ??? Behold! ??? It once happened ??? and not For it is written (Lev. 26) ??? a man ??? a man ??? This teaches ??? evenings." this to that there i.e., in another mishna that he was in their hands. ??? and not ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.