It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לד,א גמרא

What is the reason? of R' Yosi son of Yehudah For scripture said: (Num. 35) a single witness No. ??? "of death, "of death, he ??? answer but: ??? answer And the rabbbis Raysh Lakish said It is because of this: ??? And the rabbbis This "of death, What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. ??? for him on the first from ??? As it is taught: he said one from the witnesses there are for me to teach upon it ??? that do not ??? to him Scripture states: a single witness No. ??? to one from ??? who said there are for me to teach upon it guilt-obligation ??? that do not ??? to him Scripture states: one No. ??? souls the One who teaches ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except in the hour of ??? and the giving of but: in the hour of ??? judgement This teaches ??? he returns This teaches guilt-obligation They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and have come ??? says I ??? I ??? says I ??? and he is obligated I ??? the One who teaches guilt-obligation This teaches ??? but: the One who teaches ??? It is impossible ??? and to teach guilt-obligation Hey, isn't it the case that ??? It would be a logical inference ??? and the giving of who there is not in this case. And this is what the tanna means to teach: in the hour of ??? and the giving of Come and hear: ??? these opposite these until ??? one from ??? these are the words of ??? and if ??? Let the Tanna teach: also ??? a Tanna taught: ??? he turned ??? No. ??? he turned Come and hear: for he said: R' Yosi son of ??? one from ??? did he die ??? that specific it is as if ??? in his place But why? Let him say Watch out for leading vav !! And even it was. stood i.e., as long as he lived he returns of him. now from this No. he returns of him. Hey, isn't it the case that ??? according to the words of R' Yosi son of ??? "one who finds" from this general principle it would follow our rabbi, yes. "one who finds" it was said: Come and hear: two ??? they stand ??? one from ??? and one from ??? these are the words of ??? these are the words of ??? This is satisfactory these are the words of ??? tomorrow they saw The reason is other than this They asked ??? judgement except these are the words of ??? What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: For if it was they saw The reason is other than this ??? No. ??? in them? No. so that that they will not say two ??? one ??? of him abbi Assi ??? Yochanan And they said two ??? one ??? What then? He said to him: yes. ??? to them except one ??? words Abayye said: For scripture said: (Ps. 62) One a thing God two -- this refers to I hear For ??? the written Torah one he would exit to countless ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? one he would exit ??? of the academy of R' Yishmael a Tanna taught: (Jer. 23) ??? a sela coin Just as ??? this ??? to countless ??? Even the written Torah one he would exit to countless ??? How so? ??? one ??? Rav said ??? An altar of make kiddush. ??? to him Rabbi Yehoshua says: all ??? if He ascended No. He descended as it is said (Lev. 7) The elevation-offering on ??? Just as an elevation-offering that it ??? if is credited lit, rises No. ??? Even Any thing that was ??? if He ascended No. He descended Rabban Gamliel says: all ??? if He ascended No. He descended as it is said She The elevation-offering on ??? on the altar of Just as an elevation-offering that it ??? to join with the body of An altar of if is credited lit, rises No. ??? Even Any thing that was ??? if He ascended No. He descended both of them. What then does it mean when it says ??? Master, ??? to it ??? Master, ??? to it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that there i.e., in another mishna ??? it is taught at the end There is no difference between these are the words of Rabban Gamliel according to the words of R' Yehoshua except the blood ??? says May not descend, and R' Yehoshua says They descended except Rav Pappa said: As it is taught: R' Yosi the Gallilean says from the midst of as it is said

דף לד,ב גמרא

(Ex. 29) all ??? with the altar ??? listen I between ??? between that is not ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 29) ??? Just as ??? Even all ??? R' ??? says (Ex. 29) an elevation-offering Just as an elevation-offering ??? Even all ??? both of them. What then does it mean when it says ??? invalid as regarding Master, ??? to it ??? Master, ??? to it the highest For didn't Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? say An elevation-offering of a bird: is invalid There is this difference between them: one ??? to it ??? yes. but: An elevation-offering of a bird: No. and one ??? to it the highest even An elevation-offering of a bird: also except Rav Ashi said As it is taught: (Lev. 17) blood ??? This certain individual blood he poured it ??? ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: (Lev. 17) or zevach-offering ??? ??? both of them. What then does it mean when it says ??? Master, ??? to it ??? Master, ??? to it ??? zevach-offering For didn't Rabbi Abahu say ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- There is this difference between them: according to the words of Rabbi Yishmael he is not liable except One according to the words of Rabbi Akiva he is liable two this one it was said: He ascended Abayye said: Even according to the words of Rabbi Akiva also he is not liable except One For scripture said: (Deut. 12) in that place ??? in that place shall you do ??? the Merciful One ??? by day ??? words said Rabbi Chiyya son of ??? For scripture said: (Ex. 18) ??? the nation in all a time If so, the beginning of judgement also ??? of Raba pointed out a contradiction. it is written ??? the nation in all a time and then it is written (Deut. 21) and it was the case that by day ??? his children How so? day ??? judgement night ??? judgement Our mishna that is not like Rabbi ??? as it is taught: he was Rabbi Meir says: Just as Scripture states: (Deut. 21) on ??? it shall be all ??? and all ??? And so What is the connection between ??? next to leprous plague except There is an analogy between ??? Just as leprous plague by day As it is written (Lev. 13) by day ??? in it Even ??? by day for just as leprous plague that did not have ??? As it is written (Lev. 13) for all ??? the eyes of ??? Even ??? that did not have ??? and There is an analogy between leprous plague ??? Just as ??? that did not have ??? Even leprous plague that did not have ??? If it was Just as ??? in a case where there are three Even leprous plague in a case where there are three It would be a logical inference ??? in a case where there are three ??? is it not all the more so? Scripture states: (Lev. 13) ??? to ??? or to one etc. this one ??? for even if a priest one one who sees ??? This certain individual ??? of Rabbi Yochanan ??? judgement and did not say to him Rabbi Yochanan and not something in what way does does he act? thus ??? Yochanan The halacha is ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: all ??? is valid ??? and there are ??? And there is no meaning to the word is valid ??? and R' Yochanan said: to include ??? in one ??? R' Yochanan ??? by day and They complete by night What then does it mean when it says ??? That this ??? If you like, I could say ??? for many people is preferable And if you like, I could say It is because of this: where he teaches to it regarding Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion that judgement and Rabbi Meir This ??? the nation in all a time What then does it mean when it says he expounds. of him. Rabba said: ??? day ??? For it was taught in a baraita yes. ??? ??? morning, and twilight and not in the midst of the house and not by day ??? because of ??? and not ??? because of ??? and Rabbi Meir This by day ??? his children What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him This certain individual should bring himself ??? Rabbah son of ??? in front of Rav ??? and it was the case that by day ??? his children by day you ??? and if you ??? by night He said to him Except I can object with text from here: one ??? for him ??? and one ??? No. ??? for him ??? perhaps, judgement ??? as it is taught: (Num. 27) it was to the children of Israel ??? statute" ??? all the parasha (scriptural section) All of it to be judgement Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Yehudah Rav said for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said three who enter to visit an ill person ??? doing judgement two ??? And we do not make judgement and Rav Chisdah said They did not teach such a ruling except by day but: by night ??? And we do not make judgement It is because of this: where they did them witnesses And there is no meaning to the word until was it made? ??? He said to him: yes. thus ??? souls ??? by day ??? words Rav said ??? son of Chiyya Scripture states: (Num. 25) ??? to Hashem opposite the sun R' Chisda said ??? that it ??? As it is written (II Sam 21) We will hang them to Hashem ??? the grave the chosen one of Hashem

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.