It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מא,א גמרא

??? one topic ??? of the academy of ??? a Tanna taught: (Ex. 21) And so ??? a man on his neighbor ??? in it ??? he ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: (Num. 16) ??? that specific ??? pieces of wood ??? in it ??? he ??? of the academy of Rabbi a Tanna taught: (Deut. 22) on a thing who ??? on ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? yes. ??? it is not written: the Merciful One For ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: And so ??? then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? ??? but: stoning ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this and two ??? why do I have ??? to include are burnt According to the sages, the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read and let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? of him Here in this case, also, the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it ??? himself ??? What is our source for this claim Rabba said: (and there are those who say Hezekiyah said: he read (Deut. 17) ??? the dead until ??? himself ??? Rav said ??? yes. ??? from the midst of ??? to say ??? on ??? we came Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of it that is not ??? of it and if No. ??? of it in what way does ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi ??? Yehudah as it is taught: Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says ??? it is not necessary ??? on account of that did not have it was given ??? except ??? between ??? And because of the fact ??? No. ??? in what way does ??? to it giving witness ??? you It is possible ??? and all giving witness ??? you It is possible ??? No. her name giving witness Here, too, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: from the midst of that do not ??? to say ??? on ??? we came Even She It is not ??? to it giving witness ??? you It is possible ??? except ??? to us ??? who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi ??? Yehudah in what way does It concerns itself ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it is possible for them to say ??? on ??? two we came ??? So, too, ??? what is the difference here, ??? even ??? also yes. except even This that is not ??? it is possible for them to say ??? on ??? we came Rav Chisdah said one says ??? and one says ??? yes. this correct one says its implements ??? and one says its implements to the children Behold! this correct They challenged him from this teaching: correct that it should be correct one says ??? and one says ??? one says its implements ??? and one says its implements to the children yes. this correct He explains -- Rav Chisda ??? in it ??? Come and hear: one says ??? and one says ??? to the children yes. this correct there i.e., in another mishna also For example, ??? in it ??? Come and hear: It once happened ??? son of ??? fig tree he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama For example, ??? fig tree on Shabbat ??? and this was taught! They said to him: under fig tree ??? except he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama For example, ??? of fig tree Come and hear: He said to them: fig tree -- this refers to ??? figs ??? figs ??? except Rav Yosef said ??? that I son of ??? for him one son of ??? Shall I say Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? who it was. ??? For it was taught: all his years of Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? hundred and twenty year" forty year" ??? year" teach forty year" ??? and it was taught: forty year" before ??? the house ??? to it in a store and he said R' Isaac son of ??? to say that did not have ??? except that did not have ??? souls and we have learnt in a Mishna: from when the Holy House the Temple was destroyed he decreed Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai except son of ??? of the world Here, too, ??? For if it was ??? Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai a seminal emission for him R' son of ??? For it was taught: It once happened ??? Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai ??? figs except ??? before his rabbi; it was. and he said the validity ??? them his reason

דף מא,ב גמרא

and was it established ??? When it was that teach son of ??? it was. a seminal emission for him ??? before his rabbi; When it was that ??? it was. a seminal emission for him Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai For a seminal emission for him son of ??? because of lit. on the reputation of originally And so a seminal emission for him Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai because of lit. on the reputation of ??? It once happened ??? etc. Just as between ??? What then does it mean when it says even two say This is obvious! For he said one Really? know ??? standing For They said: among two also ??? standing Thus said Rabbi ??? He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he arises and thus he comes to say ??? even two say ??? and one says Really? know ??? like who like Rabbi Akiva. ??? three that two Rabba said: Hey, isn't it the case that ??? standing The tanna teaches: except Rabba said: This is what he means: even ??? two say ??? and one says Really? know ??? standing like who that is not like Rabbi Akiva. Rav Kahana Rav ??? the Sanhedrin among Rabbah ??? in them? pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama He said to them What then does it mean when it says ??? of it to the Sanhedrin of the academy of Rabbah they said to him And what does it mean when it says say of it to the Sanhedrin ??? And what does it mean when it says it is a problem to you He said to him ??? where he teaches Just as between ??? one says Really? know ??? he said one Really? know And even if two say yes. do we ??? standing ??? This and this a law established by the Torah She what is the difference here, ??? and what is the difference here, ??? He said to him thus now ??? he said one Really? know ??? to it giving witness ??? you It is possible ??? he said one from them Really? know ??? standing giving witness that you It is possible ??? he He said to them If so, ??? of it ??? of it they said to him ??? say of it ??? we do not say of it and not ??? one says ??? up to how much Rabbi Acha says: son of ??? he said ssi Rabbi Yochanan said: until the majority of his body of ??? Rabba said: Even We also ??? one says in a case where there are three and one says in Hashem. ??? But why? Let him say for this know with two ??? and this he does not know with two ??? except Is this not It is because of this: ??? know In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? also No. know ??? know it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? he said ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? did not say ??? and Rabbi Acha says: son of ??? Rav Assi said: Rabbi Yochanan said: up to how much they bless on ??? until ??? and how much time is the duration of he said Rabbi Yaakov bar Idi Rav Yehudah said until seven ??? They said: until Six ten

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.