It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מה,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? that specific section one before Him." and the woman two ??? between ??? between ??? because of ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah But the sages say: Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? And there is no meaning to the word the his wife ??? What is the reasoning is a law established by the Rabbis Scripture states: (Lev. 24) ??? that specific What then does it mean when it says that specific Shall I say that specific and not it For it is written (in Deut. 16) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man This certain individual or the his wife this particular Rather, what can we conclude? that specific that specific without ??? this one it ??? Rabbi Yehudah says that specific without ??? there is no difference a man and there is no difference a woman This comes to imply is a law established by the Rabbis ??? And Rabbi Yehudah No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? them For it was taught in a baraita ??? if ??? and if ??? until ??? ??? ??? Rabbi Yehudah says if he was ??? No. he was ??? and if he was ??? No. he was ??? Rabbah said there i.e., in another mishna we were The reason is lest ??? and they contend of it ??? the priesthood Here in this case, this one ??? And if you say will come ??? Rabbah said We have a tradition that yes. the inclination for ecil ??? except ??? Rabba said: with R' Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? it is a problem is a law established by the Rabbis ??? There is no difficulty. except Rabba said: of Rabbi Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? There is no difficulty. ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? also There is no difficulty. Scripture states: (Ezek. 23) ??? all the women and not ??? Here in this case, yes. to you ??? The greatness from this And if you would say ??? of it both Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Scripture states: (Lev. 19) And you shall love ??? to him death proper Let us say, of Rav ??? She No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world there is for them of Rav ??? and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? is preferable, for him ??? and one master reasons that it's settled. ??? is preferable ???

דף מה,א משנה

the house of ??? he was ??? two ??? one from the witnesses ??? on ??? on his heart ??? on ??? and if did he die of it he has fulfilled his obligation And if not, the second take ??? on his heart if did he die of it he has fulfilled his obligation And if not, ??? in all Israel as it is said (Deut. 17) a hand the witnesses ??? in it in the first, ??? and a hand all the nation ???

דף מה,א גמרא

a Tanna taught: ??? are his Behold! here, three and who in the case of all this They challenged this from a baraita: Just as a pit that he was so that ??? ten handbreadths Even all so that ??? ten handbreadths Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Scripture states: (Lev. 19) And you shall love ??? to him death proper If so, ??? It is because of this: ??? one from the witnesses ??? The rabbis taught: ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 19) ??? And from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: ??? And from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 19) ??? or ??? And from where do we learn ??? did he die ??? he has fulfilled his obligation Therefore, scripture states: or ??? thus

דף מה,ב גמרא

Scripture states: ??? And if not, until the second take ??? take For it was taught: Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says the stone it was in that place ??? two people ??? on his heart if did he die of it he has fulfilled his obligation ??? to you She Back to the main body of the text: ??? two people ??? on his heart except ??? to it ??? and my field to it ??? so that thus it will be ??? And if not, ??? For it was taught: Always, No. year" of it a person who ??? that He performs For if it was ??? Mar said: the stone it was etc. For it was taught: One the stone ??? of it and one wood ??? upon it and one ??? in it and one ??? in it all of them ??? with it it is not necessary to teach this ??? with it For it was taught: yes. ??? with it Rav Pappa said: What then does it mean when it says with it with it ??? Shmuel said ??? a hand the witnesses is exempt What is the reason? ??? (Deut. 17) a hand the witnesses ??? in it in the first, there is not in this case. Except I can object with text from here: witnesses ??? originally Here, too, ??? It is different there in that case For scripture said: a hand the witnesses ??? Already They challenged him from this teaching: in all places ??? two and they shall say acting as witnesses do we ??? so-and-so ??? so-and-so so-and-so so-and-so ??? Behold! this ??? Shmuel of them there are. ??? and who in the case of he read as it is written For it was taught: (Num. 35) shall certainly die" ??? he yes. for me except ??? in it from where do we learn ??? If it was you It is possible ??? in it that you ??? in all death that you It is possible ??? Scripture states: shall certainly die" ??? from all a place It is different there in that case For scripture said: shall certainly die" ??? of him It is because of this: ??? the blood two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? this one of which we were speaking? ??? the blood Who is it as it is taught: (Num. 35) ??? the blood ??? ??? a commandment ??? the blood ??? he (??? ) does not have to him ??? as it is said (Num. 35) ??? in it from all a place He said to him Master, ??? the son of of Rav Chisda to Rav Ashi and who No. in the case of he read as it is written For it was taught in a mishna: he was one from them ??? or ??? or ??? or ??? or A deaf person he does not was it made? son of ??? as it is said (Deut. 21) ??? in it and not ??? (Deut. 21) ??? that specific and not ??? (Deut. 21) And they said and not ??? (Deut. 21) ??? this and not ??? (Deut. 21) it is no more. listen ??? and not ??? What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: ??? he read as it is written No. It is different there in that case ??? he read ??? he Come and hear: It does not have ??? yes. she was made a city ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael R' ??? says It does not have ??? doing to it ??? Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? reasoned ??? originally in the case of and one master reasons that ??? also ??? he is equivalent. but: ??? in the case of he read as it is written ??? She For it was taught in a baraita he (of them) does not have a hand of them a foot ??? he (??? ) does not have Rabbi Eliezer says: he gives on ??? and he goes out Rabbi Shimon says: he gives on ??? and he goes out

דף מה,ב משנה

all ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer but the sages say he does not ??? except ??? idolatry Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? that specific his face ??? the nation the his wife ??? the tree these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer but the sages say Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? And there is no meaning to the word the his wife ??? he said ??? Rabbi Eliezer Is it not the case that Shimon son of ??? women ??? They said to him: ??? women ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? two by day one

דף מה,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Deut. 21) ??? It is possible all ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 21) For ??? God suspended Just as ??? this ??? Even all ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer but the sages say Just as ??? this ??? Even all ??? in what way ??? rabbis ??? Rabbi Eliezer he expounds. ??? rabbis ??? A general principle: For ??? creates an exclusion If it was are they, ??? say yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? Behold! yes. something other than this No.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.