It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נא,א גמרא

yes. for me except ??? to Israel some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by a mamzer with a Netin??? ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 21) the daughter of a man a priest despite the fact that is not ??? (Lev. 21) She ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? She ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? and ??? by stoning, Mar said: It is possible even ??? Sabbath ??? Sabbath the daughter of stoning She Rabba said: So, with whom does it agree? It is Rabbi Shimon for he said: burning is stricter For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because ??? in them? the Merciful One ??? of Rabbi in them? the commandments ??? Come and hear from this what is the difference here, of him that are his You might have thought that I would say that ??? for him Sabbath to join with the body of the blessing of the Service She immediately that is not ??? Sabbath ??? I would say ??? Come and hear from this It is possible even ??? this one ??? it is written ??? for he said: ??? that comes on ??? that did not have ??? it was made ??? Or perhaps, says ??? except to discharge the mitzvah every person Rather, what can we conclude? ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of the daughter of a priest even A daughter of Israel also for he said: Rava said: for me Rav Isaac son of ??? We come to compare there are there are We come to compare ??? It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: he read To exclude ??? the Merciful One ??? a priest and not ??? Israel Come and learn from this. the daughter of a priest yes. for me except ??? to Israel ??? with a Netin??? or by a mamzer ??? Therefore, scripture states: the daughter of a man a priest even though that is not ??? It is because of this: ??? them ??? Is this not the daughter of a priest She And, too, something ??? it is written For it might have entered your mind that I would say: (Lev. 21) For ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says What case is he dealing with? in a case that he came ??? now but: this one immediately that he came ??? from the beginning As Mar said: (Lev. 22) the daughter of a priest For ??? immediately ??? to it ??? and a Jew lit, Israel also (Lev. 22) ??? to the house of ??? we generalize from here ??? No. ??? I would say No. ??? Come and learn from this. that is not like Rabbi Meir as it is taught: the daughter of a priest ??? to Israel ??? terumah ??? ??? It is not ??? ??? to one from ??? the principal amount plus a fifth ??? These are the words of R' Meir But the sages say: -- this refers to -- this refers to ??? the principal amount and not Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? Rabbi Eliezer says ??? and ??? by stoning, What then does it mean when it says ??? and ??? Shall I say ??? and ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of the daughter of a priest even A daughter of Israel also Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? and his bride by stoning, except ??? and ??? like who If it was ??? was it taken out for burning and not ??? If it was like Rabbi Shimon Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't One say ??? and one ??? and if like Rabbi Yishmael Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say was it taken out for burning and not ??? ??? he ??? in the name of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina thus in the same way She ??? of ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? and thus he comes to say Any thing that was to the bottom ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? A daughter of Israel For this ??? A daughter of Israel ??? Here in this case, with the death of ??? all that it is more ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? A daughter of Israel For this ??? A daughter of Israel in reality by stoning, Here in this case, with the death of ??? by stoning, He disagreed with this R' ??? something is more to the bottom The tanna teaches: except he said Rabbi ???

דף נא,ב גמרא

In reality lit: In the world like Rabbi Yishmael and thus he comes to say ??? and ??? by stoning, and every person ??? Rabba said: what is the difference here, or This and this actually and really or This and this is a voluntary act except Rabba said: In reality lit: In the world like Rabbi Shimon but his thought is ??? Just as ??? one ??? to it ??? for burning Even ??? one ??? to it ??? to be stoned? He disagreed with this R' Chaninah this one This and this Rabbi Shimon ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: except Ravina said In reality lit: In the world ??? ??? by stoning, and ??? and that one for he says ??? in reality ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said The halacha is ??? in the name of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina Rav Yosef said Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? He said to him Abaye Except I can object with text from here: ??? holy offerings No. Let the Tanna teach: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? except ??? the reward for Here in this case, also, ??? the reward for thus ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion why do I have ??? of hearing a repeated lesson The halacha is he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: What then does it mean when it says Rabbi Yishmael as it is taught: (Lev. 21) the daughter of ??? a priest For ??? but it ??? is what the scripture says. You say ??? but it ??? Or perhaps, except Even if ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 20) a man who ??? ??? his neighbor shall certainly die" ??? The entirety they were are in the general category ??? the scripture A daughter of Israel by stoning, the daughter of a priest ??? Just as ??? the scripture A daughter of Israel to be stoned? ??? and not ??? Even ??? the scripture the daughter of a priest for burning ??? and not ??? are in the general category (Deut. 19) ??? to him as it was ??? etc. ??? What then does it mean when it says as it was ??? that it is possible except ??? are in the general category ??? It is because of this: as it is said ??? to him as it was ??? to do his brothers? and not ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: One ??? and one ??? was it taken out for burning It is possible even ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there ??? with ??? Even here, ??? with ??? He said to him R' Yishmael If it was Just as there ??? but it ??? Even here, ??? but it ??? He said to him Rabbi Akiva Yishmael my brother (Lev. 21) the daughter of the daughter of I ??? He said to him And so because of that you ??? the daughter of the daughter of shall we take out -- this refers to for burning if ??? ??? brought ??? and if ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? ??? and Rabbi Akiva ??? the value of ??? the daughter of the daughter of ??? ??? and Rabbi Yishmael reasoned ??? for him the daughter of the daughter of Learn from this he returns of him. ??? the value of and R' Yishmael This the daughter of the daughter of What then does it mean when it says he expounds. of him. should bring himself ??? of Shmuel son of Avin: on account of ??? the scripture ??? between ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: the daughter of the daughter of and Rabbi Akiva (Lev. 21) ??? they were and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? and R' Yishmael If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי we do not have but: ??? No. Come and learn from this. and Rabbi Yishmael

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.