It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נג,א גמרא

This is satisfactory to R' ??? Rabbi The reason is except to Rabbi ??? From where can you derive That there are ??? in the world" I would say ??? Rabba said: four ??? We have a tradition that them What then does it mean when it says No. because of that it lightweight what they disagree about ??? of Rabbi Shimon And the rabbbis Rabbi Zeira said to him: ??? the remainder of ??? that is not it is written in them? stoning ??? in what way ??? or ??? with them." ??? He said to him ??? with them." ??? For if it was ??? why do I have Rather, what can we conclude? ??? why do I have As it is taught: (Num. 35) shall certainly die" ??? he yes. for me except ??? in it ??? If it was you It is possible ??? in it that you ??? in all death that you It is possible ??? Therefore, scripture states: shall certainly die" ??? In any case, He said to him: Rav Acha ??? and if ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? has a problem Shall I say ??? a man ??? has a problem to come. ??? shall certainly die" ??? Just as there by stoning, Even here, by stoning, ??? the Merciful One ??? by stoning, from this general principle it would follow ??? Is this not by stoning, So rather, ??? his father and his mother ??? has a problem to come. ??? until ??? a man For if it was you permission ??? upon it except ??? upon it He said to him: the remainder of ??? has a problem For if it was ??? until ??? a man

דף נג,א משנה

These are ??? that comes on ??? and on ??? and on ??? and on ??? and on ??? the his wife ??? ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry who gives ??? and the master of ??? the Sabbath ??? his father and his mother and that comes on ??? son of ??? that comes on ??? he is liable upon it It is because of this: if but on account of ??? Rabbi Yehudah says he is not liable except It is because of this: ??? only. that comes on ??? he is liable It is because of this: ??? but on account of ??? a man between ??? his father between after ??? his father between from the betrothal between from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage that comes on his bride he is liable upon it It is because of this: his bride but on account of ??? a man between ??? his son between after ??? his son between from the betrothal between from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage

דף נג,א גמרא

It was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says if No. it was of its mother ??? he is not liable except It is because of this: ??? only. What then does it mean when it says It is not ??? to him Shall I say ??? a court from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis reason that even though ??? to him this one he does not have ??? except ??? And R' Yehudah derive it like Rabbi ??? for he said: yes. ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Oshaya: prohibits a commandment prohibits "Kedushah" ??? and not ???

דף נג,ב גמרא

prohibits a commandment ??? in words of ??? But why? ??? them prohibits a commandment ??? to hear these are the words of the sages prohibits "Kedushah" a widow ??? The greatness a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? But why? ??? them prohibits "Kedushah" As it is written (Lev. 21) ??? and it was taught: He ascended Rabbi Yehudah ??? he ??? this one chalitza ??? and if You might have thought R' Yehudah ??? he reasons for himself. ??? to Rabbi ??? he is equivalent. ??? Is this not My son, chalitza ??? that came first he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him No. he reasons for himself. For he came Rabbi Isaac It was taught by ??? Rabbi Yehudah says he is not liable except It is because of this: ??? only. and the reason What then does it mean when it says Abayye said: For scripture said: (Lev. 18) ??? She It is because of this: of its mother you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: ??? Except I can object with text from here: (Lev. 18) ??? your father No. ??? your father She It is because of this: ??? you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: of its mother except of its mother that it ??? his father he arises Here in this case, ??? to it he arises Here in this case, ??? to it now of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? his father that is not of its mother ??? of its mother that it ??? his father No. ??? A general principle: And, too, According to the sages, also it is written ??? She except This certain individual should bring himself ??? the son of of Rav This to Rabbi Yehudah also This certain individual should bring himself ??? the son of of Rav This except Rav Acha said the son of of Rav ??? Scripture states: ??? It is because of this: ??? One you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: two ??? Except I can object with text from here: (Lev. 18) ??? No. ??? She No. ??? Here, too, It is because of this: ??? One you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: two ??? For it was taught in a mishna: that comes on his bride he is liable upon it It is because of this: his bride but on account of ??? a man between ??? his son between after ??? his son and not ??? R' Yehudah except immediately ??? Back to the main body of the text: he even though ??? it is written ??? Here in this case, also, immediately ??? Back to the main body of the text: he even though ??? it is written ??? except Rabba said: his reasoning is R' Yehudah ??? your father -- this refers to ??? your father ??? to it ??? the value of ??? between ??? his father that it of its mother between ??? his father that is not of its mother of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? Scripture states: ??? No. ??? She It is because of this: of its mother you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: ??? his father

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.