It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נד,א גמרא

This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba (Lev. 20) a man creates an exclusion ??? (Lev. 20) who ??? ??? his father ??? between ??? his father that it of its mother or whether ??? his father that did not have of its mother of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 20) ??? his father ??? from him ??? the value of ??? by stoning, You say by stoning, Or perhaps, except in one from all ??? that are said in the Torah it is said here, ??? with them." and it is said ??? with them." Just as there by stoning, Even here, by stoning, ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 18) ??? your father No. ??? your father -- this refers to ??? your father You say ??? your father Or perhaps, except ??? your father actually and really it is said here, ??? your father No. ??? and it is said there (Lev. 20) ??? his father ??? Just as there ??? is what the scripture says. Even here, ??? is what the scripture says. ??? between ??? his father that it of its mother between ??? his father that is not of its mother of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 18) ??? No. ??? yes. for me except ??? the one who did the scripture of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? that it ??? his father ??? it is said here, ??? your father No. ??? and it is said there ??? his father ??? Just as ??? One who acts the scripture of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? that it ??? his father Even ??? One who acts the scripture of its mother that is not ??? his father ??? that it ??? his father (Lev. 18) ??? She It is because of this: of its mother you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: ??? And the rabbbis ??? your father actually and really This (Lev. 18) ??? male, ??? upon it two And it is like Rav Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah ??? some texts read: a gentile that comes on his father he is liable two that comes on my brother his father he is liable two Rabba said: ??? the validity of Rav Yehudah ??? in error ??? and that one for he says a stranger i.e., a non-Jew as a euphemism lit., as elevated tongue he For if it was You might have thought a stranger i.e., a non-Jew actually and really ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? for him Another teaching is like this: that comes on his father he is liable two that comes on my brother his father he is liable two that it is possible that they said does not rule like Rabbi Yehudah and there are that they said even if you say it’s Rabbi Yehudah, ??? to it ??? his father for just as my brother his father ??? he he is liable two his father not all the more so? and what they disagree about ??? and Raba one master reasons that ??? from justice. and one master reasons that yes. ??? from justice. And the rabbbis ??? his father ??? them ??? them ??? your father No. ??? And R' Yehudah This certain individual should bring himself ??? his father after death And the rabbbis This certain individual from the end of the teaching: ??? your father She And Rabbi Yehudah This certain individual should bring himself It is because of this: ??? you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: ??? a man ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: that comes on ??? he is liable upon it It is because of this: ??? but on account of ??? a man between ??? his father between after ??? his father and not ??? Rabbi Yehudah Abayye said: ??? And the rabbbis ??? his father after death ??? them This is satisfactory Rabbi Yehudah ??? to it ??? the value of except rabbis ??? them They would say to you This certain individual ??? his father ??? to it Rabbi Yehudah ??? the value of ??? for him we do not have ??? his father after death And the rabbbis ??? of his mother that is not ??? his father ??? them Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This Scripture states: ??? She it was made the scripture of his mother that is not ??? his father ??? that it ??? that comes on his bride ??? also It is because of this: ??? his son Abayye said: he opens the scripture ??? and he closes ??? his son to say to you This is his bride This is ??? his son

דף נד,א משנה

that comes on ??? and on ??? the his wife ??? ??? by stoning, if a person Watch out for leading vav he sinned livestock Just as ??? except on account of ??? to a person ??? on ??? For this reason he said the scripture ??? Another explanation: that livestock should not be ??? and they shall say This is ??? so-and-so on ???

דף נד,א גמרא

male, What is our source for this claim ??? (Lev. 20) a man creates an exclusion ??? who ??? male, between The greatness between a child ??? a woman ??? to you the scripture ??? Thus said Rabbi Yishmael Behold! this came to teach and it is found teach ??? by stoning, You say by stoning, Or perhaps, except in one from all ??? that are said in the Torah it is said here, ??? with them." and it is said ??? with them." Just as there by stoning, Even here, by stoning,

דף נד,ב גמרא

??? Scripture states: (Lev. 18) and male, No. ??? a woman an abomination She we have learned ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 23) No. it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Israel And it is said: (I Kings 14) also and that which was sanctified for Temple use he was in the land." they make ??? who ??? etc. these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him Behold! he says and male, No. ??? a woman a seminal emission of him. No. ??? livestock What is our source for this claim For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 20) a man creates an exclusion ??? who He shall give" ??? between that is large between a small one shall certainly die" by stoning, You say by stoning, Or perhaps, except in one from all ??? that are said in the Torah it is said here, ??? and it is said there (Deut. 13) For ??? Just as there by stoning, Even here, by stoning, we have learned ??? From where do we derive this? Scripture states: (Ex. 22) all who lay with livestock shall certainly die" if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? we have learned ??? between ??? between ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 18) and with all livestock No. ??? of it we have learned ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 23) No. it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Israel And it is said: (I Kings 14) also and that which was sanctified for Temple use he was in the land." etc. these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him Behold! he says No. ??? No. ??? that comes on ??? upon it male, he said R' Abahu according to the words of Rabbi Yishmael he is liable two one fill ??? and one fill it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use according to the words of Rabbi Akiva he is not liable except One No. ??? No. ??? one She that comes on ??? livestock upon it he said Rabbi Abahu according to the words of R' Yishmael he is liable two one fill ??? and one fill it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use according to the words of Rabbi Akiva he is not liable except One ??? one She Abaye said Even if according to the words of Rabbi Yishmael also he is not liable except One and so when it is written No. it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? it is written except to Rabbi Yishmael ??? for him ??? for him (Ex. 22) from all who lay with livestock shall certainly die" if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? the Merciful One ??? who lay Just as who lay ??? Even ??? to a domesticated animal he said Rabbi Abahu according to the words of Rabbi Akiva he is liable two one fill ??? and one fill ??? according to the words of Rabbi Yishmael he is not liable except One This and this No. it shall be and that which was sanctified for Temple use he Abaye said even according to the words of Rabbi Yishmael also he is liable two As it is written all who lay with livestock shall certainly die" if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? the Merciful One ??? who lay Just as who lay ??? Even ??? but: that comes on ??? male, upon it that comes on ??? livestock upon it between to R' ??? between ??? to Rabbi Yishmael he is liable three to Rabbi ??? he is liable two The rabbis taught: ??? No. they make in it a child ??? livestock they make of it a small one ??? What then does it mean when it says No. they make in it a child ??? Rav said No. they make ??? less than ??? nine two ??? nine two And Shmuel said No. they make ??? less than ??? three years ??? three years about what do they disagree? Rav reasoned all ??? and all ??? And for Shmuel reasoned ??? a woman it is written This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav male, son of nine two and one day

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.