It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ס,א גמרא

(Ex. 22) "A sorceress No. let her live" and then it is written (Ex. 22) all who lay with livestock shall certainly die" all ??? are in the general category all who lay with livestock ??? are in the general category "A sorceress No. ??? Rabbi Eliezer says Even on ??? From where do we learn this? Shmuel said For scripture said: (Lev. 19) ??? to you Already (Lev. 19) ??? No. ??? No. ??? Just as ??? Even ??? Just as ??? between in the land." between "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel Even ??? between in the land." between "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel Except I can object with text from here: (Lev. 18) ??? ??? and the statutes of ??? to you Already there i.e., in another mishna ??? ??? Here in this case, ??? originally ??? R' Yehoshua said: son of ??? Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov he is not liable until ??? in that place son of four letters To exclude son of two letters that is not This is obvious! ??? ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What would you have said? the validity in reality he ??? Come and learn from this. that it is possible that they said Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov Learn from this in that place son of four letters also in that place he This is obvious! ??? ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What would you have said? until That there are in that place Rabbah and the validity in reality he ??? justice. ??? they stand From where do we derive this? R' Yitzchak said son of Ami For scripture said: (Judges 3) ??? came ??? and he sits ??? who to him ??? and he said ??? a thing God for me unto you and He established from by the seat Is it not the case that items ??? for just as ??? a king Moav that he was a stranger i.e., a non-Jew and not know except ??? he stood Israel in that place ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! ??? From where do we derive this? As it is written (II Kings 18) ??? son of ??? son of ??? to Hezekiyah ??? garments ??? to him these are the words of ??? No. ??? From where do we derive this? R' Abahu said We come to compare ??? It is written here ??? garments And it is written there (II Kings 2) and Elisha one who sees This is only in the case ??? Israel ??? and not ??? any more ??? that two ??? as it is said ??? that two Really? know that are ??? for just as Scripture states: ??? This teaches that are ??? In reality lit: In the world The Rabbis taught one ??? and one listen ??? listen he is liable ??? and the witnesses yes. they are obligated ??? immediately ??? at the hour ??? And so ??? at the hour ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall This one comes to ??? now Don't let it enter your mind! As it is written (II Kings 19) And it was ??? the king Hezekiyah ??? these are the words of ??? ??? the king Hezekiyah ??? and they No. ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? he is not liable ??? Israel ??? he was And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said yes. ??? except because of lit. on the reputation of ??? only. To exclude ??? that is not ??? of Rabbi Chiyya ??? for he said: Rabbi Chiyya ??? in these times (nowadays) he is not liable ??? If you say that, ??? all a cloth ??? from those Shall I say from Israel who ??? all this except This is obvious! ??? and if in that place ??? who We have a tradition that except Is this not ??? And learn from this in these times (nowadays) he that is not this one from the beginning he is liable "Hear!" ??? the second says Even I ??? he said Reish Lakish: Learn from this Even I ??? is valid ??? souls ??? he that He performs rabbis and here in this other case, immediately where it is not possible ??? rabbis ??? For if it was ??? is invalid, Here in this case, It is because of this: where it is not possible ??? says Even I ??? like Rabbi Akiva. ??? three that two

דף ס,ב משנה

??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry one ??? and one the altar of and one ??? and one ??? and one ??? and one ??? upon it to God? and the one who says to him to me you but: ??? and the bathhouse ??? transgresses without shall you do ??? transgresses without shall you do ??? himself ??? This is ??? the stone ??? This is ???

דף ס,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says one ??? he said Rabbi ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one ??? and one the altar of and one ??? and one ??? and one ??? and even that did not have ??? also ??? Abayye said: ??? we were ??? As it is written (Ps. 16) ??? words For the Rabbis taught Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said (Ex. 22) ??? I was says ??? holy offerings outside is what the scripture says. Therefore, scripture states: ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry is what the scripture says. yes. for me except ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 22) ??? to Hashem ??? all of them for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? on account of ??? ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 17) ??? God others ??? to them and right next lit: and leaning for him (Deut. 17) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man This certain individual etc. ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 34) For No. ??? after It is possible that I ??? Scripture states: ??? are in the general category it was and for what reason ??? To make an analogy from it and to say to you Just as ??? is isolated ??? that it ??? and we are guilty on its account death Even all that it ??? and we are guilty on its account death ??? on herself ??? on the general group all of it Mar said: I was says ??? holy offerings outside is what the scripture says. ??? holy offerings outside he is spiritually cut off he You might have thought that I would say that For ??? of him. ??? For No. ??? of him. he is spiritually cut off Come and learn from this. He said to him: Raba son of Rav ??? I would say ??? to teach on the general group all of it And if you say ??? why do I have ??? livestock to throw of its blood some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry and to offer ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.