It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סא,א גמרא

forbidden ??? he said it is permitted. This is satistfactory to R' Yochanan except ??? he is required he read He disagreed with this Rav ??? and to Rebbi Yochanan it does not require he read Up to this point, No. ??? Rabbi Yochanan except livestock but: a person No. son of ??? he and he came he read ??? a person ??? He disagreed with this Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? who he is required he read Up to this point, No. ??? Sarai Reish Lakish: except livestock but: a person son of ??? he something ??? is permitted. ??? He said to him Rav Acha ??? for what for he says for him Raba son of Rav ??? I would say ??? to teach on the general group all of it (Deut. 12) ??? What then does it mean when it says And if you say ??? himself ??? Just as ??? a way ??? Even all a way ??? except ??? himself ??? I thought to say Because ??? he Even all ??? Come and learn from this. but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: Rabbi Eliezer from where do we learn ??? livestock ??? that he was he is liable as it is said (Lev. 16) and not ??? any more ??? if he does not one topic ??? As it is written ??? one topic ??? that did not have ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? av Hamnunah ??? for him ??? of him. Rabbah ??? for him ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? yes. says No. ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: One who says ??? I shall go ??? He said to him in the case of one who says Really? ??? by the except ??? Rav Yosef said: ??? She as it is taught: One who says ??? Rabbi Meir he is obligated And R' Yehudah exempts in a case ??? the whole world does not disagree As it is written (Ex. 20) No. shall you do to you ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? in reality Rabbi Meir reasoned ??? the validity She And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? Is this not the validity She he returns Rav Yosef said Is this not the validity She that they said that even according to R' Yehudah ??? also ??? he is obligated ??? Rabbi Yehudah says In reality lit: In the world he is not liable until ??? I shall go ??? about what do they disagree? ??? for himself and there are those who say yes. what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? for himself ??? for him And there is no meaning to the word ??? for him ??? he ??? for himself No. ??? for him ??? They said:

דף סא,ב גמרא

What is the difference ??? of us ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? upon it ??? here, privately ??? here, among the many ??? an individual No. ??? secondly, many ??? and not ??? secondly, Rav Yosef said ??? I thought to say to it As it is written (Deut. 13) No. ??? to him and not you shall hear ??? this one ??? and he heard he is liable ??? Abaye who that I between ??? for many people ??? an individual For it was taught: (Deut. 13) For ??? your brother son of ??? one an individual ??? and one many ??? the scripture an individual from this general principle it would follow many and many from this general principle it would follow an individual an individual from this general principle it would follow many ??? on ??? on ??? many from this general principle it would follow an individual ??? on ??? on ??? In this case, the validity he ??? but: in all words For ??? except Abayye said: here, ??? himself here, ??? others ??? himself ??? others ??? after them Abayye said: ??? I thought to say to it As it is written No. ??? to him and not you shall hear ??? this one ??? and he heard he is liable Rava said: This and this ??? others this one ??? thus in the same way ??? thus in the same way drink thus in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? this one that is not He said to him thus in the same way ??? thus in the same way drink etc. Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it As it is written (Deut. 13) ??? the nations who ??? unto you etc. What do I have to learn from ??? and What do I have to learn from ??? thus ??? of ??? you teach Just as ??? of ??? Is this not for he said: for him thus in the same way ??? thus in the same way drink thus in the same way ??? thus in the same way ??? Learn from this Rav Ashi said: at the end of the teaching, ??? Ravina he said No. -- this refers to Even -- this refers to The tanna teaches: it was said: ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry from love ??? Abaye said he is liable Rava said: is exempt Abaye said he is liable for it is the case that ??? Rava said: is exempt If it was ??? upon it ??? yes. If it was No. ??? a sign of ??? And Abaye said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry one ??? etc. Is this not one ??? from love ??? And Rabba said to you No. ??? Rabbi ??? Abayye said: ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: (Ex. 20) No. ??? to them to them If it was you ??? but: you ??? to a person ??? It is possible even ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 20) and not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? it was. ??? and Raba ??? and not ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry and not ??? For this ??? and here in this other case, Is this not ??? And Abaye said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: a priest Messiah ??? Rabbi says ??? It once happened But the sages say: ??? a thing they agree ??? they agree that do not sends a guilt-offering suspended This ??? It once happened ??? How so? How should we understand this? If his reasoning is the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue he ??? to him Behold! his heart to heaven. except that he saw ??? to him If it was ??? upon it ??? he

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.