It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סב,א גמרא

and if No. ??? upon it ??? No. anything he except Is this not from love ??? And Rabba said to you No. in the case of one who says is permitted. says is permitted. we were ??? a thing in the case of one who says is permitted. ??? a thing ??? a small portion of ??? a small portion of It was taught by Rabbi ??? in front of Rabbi Yochanan ??? one he is not liable except One He said to him: ??? It was taught by ??? he said Rabbi Abba this one for he said: R' ??? It is a disagreement R' Yosi and Rabbi Natan as it is taught: ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei and Rabbi Natan says ??? for one for he said: ??? also ??? also ??? Rav Yosef disagreed perhaps, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yosei there i.e., in another mishna ??? for him dividing among the guests ??? (Lev. 4) ??? as it is taught: R' Yosei says One who acts ??? occasions ??? One on all of them occasions ??? on all One and one and R' Yonatan said What is the reason? of R' Yosi As it is written One who acts ??? One ??? there are ??? One that it there are and behold that it One One Shimon ??? in that place ??? there are the forefathers ??? One that it there are ??? Sabbath ??? there are that it One ??? Sabbath ??? But here, in this case, that is not ??? for him dividing among the guests ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? dividing among the guests ??? also Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? One ??? a sign of one there are the forefathers ??? a staff before it One that it there are ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? there are that it One ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? This ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry How so? If his reasoning is the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue he ??? to him Behold! his heart to heaven. except that he saw ??? for him If it was ??? upon it ??? he If it was No. ??? upon it No. anything he except from love ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: he is liable except to Raba for he said: is exempt What is there to say? except in the case of one who says is permitted. ??? of him Raba ??? both this and this in his hand What then? ??? he is liable except One This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? and who seeks ??? For this Here in this case, it is written ??? A bull ??? a male goat and privately ??? And even ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: they agree ??? And naught else something For he came Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah he said

דף סב,ב גמרא

thus a Tanna taught: in front ??? on Shabbat ??? the commandments ??? in the remainder of the commandments ??? on Shabbat ??? One who acts two ??? one he is liable on all One and one Just as that do not thus in the remainder of the commandments ??? in the remainder of the commandments ??? the commandments ??? without ??? he is liable Just as that do not thus on Shabbat Mar said: ??? on Shabbat ??? One who acts two etc. How so? Shall I say ??? regarding the remainder of the commandments he was eating milk ??? Here in this case, both ??? and here in this other case, both ??? except regarding the remainder of the commandments ??? he is liable except One How so? he was eating milk and milk ??? regarding Sabbath ??? Here in this case, one ??? and here in this other case, one ??? And this is like the position for he said: for him ??? It was taught by ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? perhaps, In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? Just as that do not thus in the remainder of the commandments ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry ??? Ami for he said: Rabbi Ami ??? one he is not liable except One No. ??? for him ??? it is taught at the end ??? in the remainder of the commandments ??? the commandments ??? without ??? he is liable ??? without ??? How so? If it was that thus reasoned the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue he ??? to him Behold! his heart to heaven. except that he saw ??? for him If it was ??? upon it ??? he and if No. ??? upon it No. anything She except from love ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: he is liable except to Raba for he said: is exempt What is there to say? except in the case of one who says is permitted. Just as that do not thus on Shabbat this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper ??? Up to this point, No. Raba brought this very question ??? both this and this except If it was ??? one If it was ??? both is exempt ??? there is not in this case. for one for he said: What then does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps In reality lit: In the world I would say to you But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, in the remainder of the commandments ??? without ??? that thus reasoned ??? he ??? Just as that do not thus on Shabbat this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper ??? ??? ??? is exempt And it is like Rav ??? Shmuel said for he said: ??? he is liable which provides benefit ??? on Shabbat is exempt ??? Torah R' Yochanan with his reasoning that is not ??? But the beginning of the teaching, it is dealing with a case where there is only one. The reason is and at the end of the teaching, it is dealing with a case where there is only one. The reason is for thus said Rabbi Yochanan one ??? for me ??? who follow the reasoning ??? ??? a Tanna taught: ??? secondly, my heart ??? Back to the main body of the text:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.