It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סג,א גמרא

he said R' Ami ??? one he is not liable except One Abayye said: What is the reason מאי טעמא For R' Ami Scripture states: (Ex. 20) No. ??? the scripture ??? all of them the blessing of the Service One And who said it? Abaye thus For thus said Abaye: three ??? For what reason One ??? and one that did not have ??? and one ??? of Rabbi Ami he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him No. he reasons for himself. Back to the main body of the text: Abayye said: three ??? For what reason One ??? and one that did not have ??? and one ??? (Deut. 12) ??? except One ??? or in the case that one is not ??? and one ??? and one ??? upon it ??? One who says to him to me ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said immediately who said to him to me you he is liable for what If it was ??? Our mishna She except ??? and even According to the sages, For it was taught: he is not liable except on a thing in which there is in it It once happened For example, ??? and Raysh Lakish said Which Tanna taught: ??? R' ??? She for he said: No. in the case of It once happened from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis reason that in the case of It once happened and thus he comes to say Rav also to R' ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to R' ??? This is obvious! we were ??? What would you have said? Up to this point, No. he is obligated Rabbi Akiva sacrifice except ??? As it is written of him. he is spiritually cut off But here, in this case, that is not it is written of him. he is spiritually cut off I would say No. Come and learn from this. ??? As it is written (Ex. 32) ??? to him ??? to him and they shall say etc. that R' Yochanan said ??? of Israel ??? others say ??? of Israel ??? He said to him: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Is it not the case that all ??? in that place heaven and Another thing: ??? "from everlasting as it is said (Ex. 22) ??? to Hashem ??? except Just as Therefore, scripture states: (Ex. 32) who ??? gods ??? but: ??? When Rav Dimi came Rabbi Eliezer said on all of them ??? except ??? what is the difference here, ??? that is not ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not in which is not It once happened Behold! also Is this not ??? he And there is no meaning to the word ??? on Is this not ??? as it is taught: from where do we learn ??? from ??? before ??? that he was without shall you do Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 19) No. ??? on the blood Another thing: No. ??? on the blood No. ??? meat ??? blood ??? Rabbi ??? says ??? that do not ??? on ??? a court בית דין Scripture states: No. ??? on the blood R' ??? says from where do we learn ??? ??? that do not ??? anything all that specific day Scripture states: No. ??? on the blood ??? Rabbi ??? Yochanan ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: No. ??? on the blood and Thus said Rabbi Avin: son of Chiyya (and there are those who say R' Avin: son of ??? on all of them he does not ??? It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not ??? except For he came ??? R' Elazar said on all of them he does not ??? except for ??? what is the difference here, ??? that is not ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not ??? Behold! also Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? This certain individual like R' Yehudah for he said: Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? upon it as it is taught: (Ex. 12) No. ??? from him until mornings came the scripture to give One who acts after No. shall you do

דף סג,ב גמרא

to say that do not ??? upon it these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Ya'akov says No. from the Name is this except It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected Is this not in which is not It once happened and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? Behold! this ??? From where do we derive this? as it is taught: (Ex. 23) in that place God others No. ??? that did not have it is said a person to his fellow ??? for me beside by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? (Ex. 23) No. Watch out for leading vav "And on heard ??? that did not have reside ??? and not ??? and not it be caused by to others ??? Another thing: No. Watch out for leading vav "And on heard ??? clearly and explicitly it is written of him. (Deut. 13) and all Israel ??? and they shall fear etc. except ??? and not it be caused by to others ??? for him ??? of Shmuel for he said: The father of Shmuel is forbidden to a person ??? with ??? lest ??? to him ??? and "??? has sworn are his and the Torah he said No. Watch out for leading vav "And on heard ??? For he came ??? the daughter of ??? He said to him: Raba in a case the daughter of Master, He said to him: ??? He said to him: For it is written in that place God others No. ??? He said to him: Thus said R' Yochanan all by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? in the Torah is permitted. to invoke her name Hey, isn't it the case that in a case ??? As it is written (Is. 46) he bowed ??? and if No. ??? No. He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? he saw One is greater than ??? that it ??? that are two ??? and a second person ??? Behold! this One suffering from gonorrhea complete. Ravina said ??? also ??? it is written As it is written (Is. 65) ??? table Rav Nachman said all ??? except ??? As it is written he bowed ??? No. shall be consumed"? ??? and then it is written (Hosea 10) His word ??? the house of mischief" ??? which provides ??? For but: upon it with it ??? upon it ??? on ??? For ??? from him We will suggest an alternate reading of this text: Do not read ??? except ??? Rabbi Yitzchak said What then does it mean that it is written (Hosea 13) "And now, ??? to them ??? etc. What then does it mean when it says ??? This teaches for all of one and one One who acts ??? and he places it ??? at the hour ??? from the midst of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? a person calves ??? R' Yitzchak said of the academy of Rabbi Ami that were ??? they give ??? money or property ??? ??? doing ??? beside ??? those particular outwards immediately ??? those particular they were running ??? of them say to him by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry valued him, and about You ??? himself to him Rabba said: This ??? a person calves ??? calves ??? a person should bring himself except Rabba said: all ??? his son some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry He said to him: ??? The greatness he sacrificed to him ??? to him Rav Yehudah said Rav said (II Kings 17) and the men of ??? they make ??? the daughters of And what does it mean when it says ??? (II Kings 17) and the men of ??? they make ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? a rooster (II Kings 17) and the men of ??? they make ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? (II Kings 17) ??? they make ??? and ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? and a donkey (II Kings 17) ??? their children. ??? in fire ??? the God of ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? for him ??? for he answered for him ??? Even ??? a king Yehudah ??? his father to do to him thus except ??? of its mother ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? they were Israel ??? where there is not in it actually and really and not his male slave by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry except ??? to them ??? in a case of publicly known plague. He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? (Jer. 17) ??? their children. ??? etc. and R' Elazar said like a person in which there is to him ??? on his son according to ??? of him. Come and hear: (Lev. 26) and I have given ??? on ??? he said Elijah ??? he was ??? on ??? famine ??? One time he found the infant that he was ??? is resting in the dunghill He said to him: ??? you He said to him: ??? I He said to him: anything a remnant would remain ??? He said to him: Is this not except from me He said to him: if I ??? a thing that you ??? in it you teach He said to him: there are. He said to him: say in all day "Hear, O Israel" Hashem our God, Hashem is one!" He said to him:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.