It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עג,א משנה

and they are ??? those particular ??? after his fellow ??? and after ??? and after ??? but: ??? after livestock ??? the Sabbath ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry yes. ??? those particular ???

דף עג,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? after his fellow ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 19) No. ??? on blood ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself to account for that which was taught ??? and one who sees his fellow that he was ??? or raw lit., living ??? or ??? have come upon it that he was he is liable ??? Scripture states: No. ??? on blood ??? yes. So, here, So rather, ??? From where do we derive this? We come to compare ??? Just as ??? that did not have came except ??? he said Torah ??? "One who pursues after his fellow ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! And so ??? from justice. of the academy of Rabbi a Tanna taught: ??? he (Deut. 22) For as it was ??? a man on his neighbor ??? And so Just as we have learned ??? From here, Behold! this came to teach and it is found teach There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? Even ??? From where do we derive this? ??? of the academy of R' Yishmael ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael (Deut. 22) And there is no meaning to the word ??? to it this one there are ??? to it in all a thing that it is possible ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? and one who sees his fellow that he was ??? or raw lit., living ??? or ??? have come upon it that he was he is liable ??? Scripture states: No. ??? on blood ??? Hey, isn't it the case that from here ??? from there ??? Scripture states: and you shall return it to him If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? I would say No. Come and learn from this. The rabbis taught: one ??? after his fellow ??? and after ??? and after ??? and after ??? a court בית דין and after ??? those particular ??? a widow ??? The greatness a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? yes. ??? those particular ??? of it transgression yes. ??? it ??? there are to it ??? yes. ??? it ??? Rabbi Yehudah says Even ??? to him that did not have ??? From where do we learn this? Scripture states: (Deut. 22) ??? No. shall you do a thing yes. ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? this ??? -- this refers to ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned these ??? these ??? a court בית דין all Behold! why do I have It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? It is because of this: that he came ??? to it but: ??? that is not ??? for him I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Behold!

דף עג,ב גמרא

It is because of this: That this Is this not ??? he And then it happened that ??? to it but: the remainder of ??? and not ??? I would say it is not written: the Merciful One Watch out for leading vav he sinned and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Watch out for leading vav he sinned then I might incorrectly say: even ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? a court yes. ??? it is not written: the Merciful One Watch out for leading vav he sinned and let the Merciful One write in the Torah Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? and it does not require ??? yes. So, here, So rather, ??? one ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry and one ??? livestock Sabbath and to Rebbi Shimon son of ??? for he said: ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? why do I have one ??? livestock and one ??? Sabbath For it might have entered your mind that I would say: ??? Sabbath ??? and to Rebbi ??? Shimon for he said: ??? the Sabbath ??? That it comes Sabbath ??? What is there to say? one ??? livestock And the other one ??? the Merciful One ??? the writing of also ??? Rabbi Yehudah says Even ??? to him that did not have ??? about what do they disagree? Rabba said: ??? on ??? that did not have ??? rabbis reason that ??? the Merciful One Consider this case: ??? on ??? And Rabbi Yehudah This for he says the Merciful One killed him It is because of this: ??? this one No. ??? He said to him: Rav ??? a widow ??? The greatness also ??? to it He said to him: ??? Rabbah ??? the Merciful One ??? No. ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned these ??? They challenged this from a baraita: and these ??? in which they have ??? that comes on ??? rabbis in front of Rav Chisda ??? to it ??? No. must make restitution until ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? -- this refers to is the kiss. except ??? -- this refers to ??? What is there to say? except Rav Chisdah said For example, upon it came that did not have ??? and he returned came upon it ??? Rava said: ??? that did not have ??? and it is R' Yehudah

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.