It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עה,א גמרא

and if ??? No. Let us say, for him this one ??? this one in a case of publicly known plague. Rav Yehudah said Rav said It once happened ??? one ??? One and raised up his heart ??? and They asked ??? And they said he (the possibility of repair if done improperly) does not have until ??? the sages said ??? and do not ??? to him ??? before him ??? and do not ??? before him ??? with it ??? the hedge ??? and not ??? with it ??? the hedge They disagreed about this, R' Ya'akov son of This and R' Shmuel son of Nachmeni One says ??? a man it was and one says ??? it was This is satisfactory for one for he said: ??? a man it was then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? it was What then does it mean when it says all this Rav Papa said, It is because of this: ??? Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? he said so that that it shall not be the daughters of Israel ??? No. ??? It is like that which was said by Rabbi Isaac for thus said Rabbi Isaac From the day that the house of was destroyed ??? transgression as it is said (Prov. 9) water ??? and bread ???

דף עה,א משנה

and they are ??? that comes on a woman ??? the daughter of a priest ??? there are are in the general category a woman ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter the daughter of Watch out for leading vav or his daughter the daughter of his son the daughter of his wife the daughter of ??? the daughter of he built ??? and if ??? and if ???

דף עה,א גמרא

that comes on a woman ??? No. The tanna teaches: except that comes on a woman ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? and one ??? and if ??? And we have learned there are are in the general category a woman ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? are written clearly and explicitly ??? We come to compare This is satistfactory ??? for he said: ??? There is this difference between them: Our mishna with whom does it agree? Rabbi Akiva She except to Raba for he said: ??? after death There is this difference between them: Our mishna with whom does it agree? He could say to you Raba It was taught by that comes on a woman ??? there are are in the general category a woman ??? and if ??? and if ??? that he came he is required ??? if ??? It was taught by also ??? and if ??? to Raba ??? that he came he is required ??? if ??? and if ??? It was taught by also ??? words ??? (Lev. 24) a man who ??? a woman and cubits yes. for me except a woman and cubits the daughter of a woman the daughter of ??? the daughter of he built from where do we learn it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there ??? the daughter of ??? the daughter of he built Even here, ??? the daughter of ??? the daughter of he built from where do we learn to do ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? from where do we learn to do to the bottom ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there to the bottom ??? Even here, to the bottom ??? for just as here, is more ??? Even there is more ??? Mar said: from where do we learn to do ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say the daughter of he built ??? together ??? except if ??? now if ??? No. ??? to us if ??? He ascended

דף עה,ב גמרא

Abayye said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: from where do we learn to do the remainder of that comes from him ??? that comes from it it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? and etc. Hey, isn't it the case that in the remainder of that are his No. ??? of him. ??? Rabba said: He said to me: Rav Isaac son of ??? We come to compare there are there are We come to compare ??? Mar said: from where do we learn to do to the bottom ??? What then does it mean when it says to the bottom ??? Shall I say the daughter of he built the daughter of ??? together ??? except if ??? and if ??? This to the bottom ??? is more ??? It was taught by is more ??? If so, it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? for just as now ??? No. "writing" ??? Abayye said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: from where do we learn to do three ??? is more ??? to the bottom it is said to the bottom ??? and it is said is more ??? Just as to the bottom three ??? Even is more three ??? for just as ??? One who acts to the bottom ??? Even ??? also One who acts is more ??? Rav Ashi said: In reality lit: In the world ??? And what does it mean when it says to the bottom to the bottom ??? If it was Just as She if cubits forbidden Even he if of its mother forbidden Abayye said: Scripture states: ??? She It is because of this: of its mother you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: if of its mother Rava said: between for one for he said: ??? or whether for one for he said: ??? No. We come to compare ??? Just as She if cubits forbidden Even he also if of its mother forbidden ??? Just as She ??? Even he also ??? burning is stricter that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides cubits ??? shall you say ??? by stoning, And furthermore, of its mother by stoning, if of its mother ??? And furthermore, Just as She No. ??? of it between cubits ??? cubits Even he also No. ??? in it between of its mother ??? of its mother ??? stoning is stricter ??? No. ??? Just as She if cubits forbidden Even he also if of its mother forbidden ??? there i.e., in another mishna he ??? But here, in this case, by stoning, ??? burning is stricter that it is possible ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.