It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פא,א גמרא

No. you say for him ??? thus as it is taught: Behold! that he was his father transgresses on these are the words of Torah he does not say to him Abba ??? on these are the words of Torah except says to him Abba thus in the same way it is written in the Torah the end of the end of we were ??? except says to him Abba the written Torah It is written in the Torah thus in the same way ???

דף פא,א משנה

who ??? a court it is judged ??? he crossed transgression ??? two ??? it is judged ??? R' Yosei says it is judged ??? upon it

דף פא,א גמרא

This is obvious! except ??? Rabba said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that which is in the past transgression lightweight ??? on transgression lightweight and he returned and he crossed transgression is stricter You might have thought that I would say that immediately ??? lightweight This a person ??? he Come and learn from this. from him asked ??? of Rav Yosef son of Chama ??? son of he gave ??? this one the validity ??? rabbis who ??? two ??? a court בית דין it is judged ??? As it is written (Ezek. 18) ??? son of ??? poured blood ??? to the mountains he ate and ??? his neighbor tamei and do not ??? exalted. ??? son of ??? poured blood ??? ??? his neighbor ??? -- this refers to ??? a man ??? and do not ??? exalted. ??? -- this refers to by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry by stoning, and then it is written (Ezek. 18) shall certainly die" ??? in it it shall be by stoning, He disagreed with this Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak I would say all of them by stoning, ??? son of ??? poured blood this son of ??? his neighbor tamei -- this refers to ??? and do not ??? exalted. ??? -- this refers to by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? If so, And what can we come and learn from this? ??? perhaps, Torah ??? he turned If so, It was necessary for him ??? so that thus it will be ??? Moses our rabbi, ??? Rav Acha the son of Rabbi Chanina What then does it mean that it is written (Ezek. 18) to the mountains No. he ate that did not have he ate ??? No. exalted. to ??? the house of Israel that did not have he has walked ??? and ??? his neighbor No. ??? that did not have He descended ??? his fellow and do not a woman a menstruant No. ??? that did not have benefit ??? of justice and then it is written (Ezek. 18) a righteous person he raw lit., living ??? Rabban Gamliel ??? For scripture, ??? he was ??? and he said one that He performs ??? he ??? No. He said to him Rabbi Akiva Except I can object with text from here: (Lev. 18) to ??? in all ??? Here, too, in all of them yes. ??? No. except in one from all ??? Here, too, in one from all ??? he crossed ??? It was taught: How so? he said Rabbi Yosei it is judged ??? the first ??? upon it ??? and she was made ??? a man it is judged ??? a man and she was made ??? it is judged ??? a man He said to him: Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? to Raba ??? and she was made ??? a man it is judged ??? also ??? a man For thus said R' Abahu give thanks R' Yosi ???

דף פא,ב גמרא

He said to him: ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? to him

דף פא,ב משנה

who ??? and year" a court בית דין ??? that specific to the dome ??? that specific ??? until ???

דף פא,ב גמרא

It is because of this: ??? and year" a court בית דין ??? that specific to the dome he said R' ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish said: Here in this case, ??? of ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? son of ??? he ??? he that is not ??? killed him And because of the fact that he came ??? to it ??? for him ??? He said to him Rabbi Ya'akov to R' ??? son of ??? come ??? to you ??? of he is spiritually cut off One but: of two and of three ??? he that he came he tastes. and not ??? the entire ??? who ??? year" even though that is not ??? Let us say, ??? that is not ??? For if it was Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel this statement that he said poses a contradiction: until three times did not occur ??? Ravina said even you say Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel his reasoning is transgressions ??? They challenged him from this teaching: he crossed transgression in which there is ??? the first and the second ??? that specific and the third ??? that specific to the dome Abba Shaul says: Even ??? that specific ??? that specific to the dome Is this not everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? of Rabbi and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel what they disagree about No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world there is for them ??? and here in this other case, In this case, ??? reasoned transgressions ??? and one master reasons that ??? in it ??? in it ??? his head ??? the first and the second ??? in it the third ??? that specific to the dome Abba Shaul says: Even ??? in it ??? that specific to the dome and there in that case ??? there is not in this case. about what do they disagree? Ravina said ??? it requires ??? what they disagree about And what does it mean when it says had a vaulted root Rav Yehudah said fill ??? in a case ??? Raysh Lakish said (Ps. 34) ??? a wicked person evil and Raysh Lakish said What then does it mean that it is written (Ecc. 9) For ??? No. know a person ??? evil What then does it mean when it says ??? evil he said Reish Lakish: ???

דף פא,ב משנה

??? without witnesses ??? that specific to the dome ??? that specific (Is. 30) bread It is distressing and water ???

דף פא,ב גמרא

??? Rav said ??? is isolated ??? And Shmuel said that did not have ??? and Rav Chisda he said ??? For example, ??? and not ??? It once happened ??? son of ??? that specific bread It is distressing and water ??? Why is it different here, where he teaches ??? to him bread It is distressing and water ??? and why is it different there, where he teaches ??? that specific ??? until ??? Rav Sheshet said This and this ??? to him bread It is distressing and water ??? until ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? that specific ??? until ???

דף פא,ב משנה

??? ??? in it a priest ??? yes. ??? the priests. bring in that specific to the court bet din except The "flowers of the priesthood" i.e., the newest priests ??? that specific except ??? ??? in the Holy Temple Rabbi Akiva says: ??? but the sages say ??? heaven

דף פא,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said implements of ??? And thus it says (Num. 4) and ??? in a case ??? (Num. 4) and not Watch out for leading vav And they went --- to see ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Rav Yosef learned: ??? ??? rabbis (and there are those who say Rabbah son of ??? They said: ??? to him ??? Rav Kahana brought this very question ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.