It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פה,א גמרא

and Rabbi Shimon Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't all say work that is not it requires ??? is exempt upon it They asked of him ??? son of What then? ??? He said to him and after who they permitted except honor heaven is preferable Here in this case, also, honor heaven is preferable They challenged him from this teaching: for just as who ??? a commandment that did not have ??? who that is not a commandment ??? is it not logical ??? that did not have ??? Is this not This and this in a place a commandment this one ??? this one ??? No. This and this there is no difference his son and there is no difference after And there is no difficulty. here, in a place a commandment here, that did not have in a place a commandment And this is what the tanna means to teach: for just as in a place a commandment ??? a commandment that did not have ??? that did not have in a place a commandment that is not a commandment ??? is it not logical ??? that did not have ??? Come and hear: that is coming out ??? came his son ??? he is liable someone else came ??? is exempt and we were at of it what is the difference here, his son and what is the difference here, after and Rav Chisdah said ??? in it to go out and does not he would exit Rav Sheishet ??? to it ??? in it to go out If so, after also after a person ??? he For didn't Rav Sheishet say ??? sleeping did he die he is liable Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? where there is not in it the value of ??? For didn't Rabbi Ami say R' Yochanan said: ??? where there is not in it the value of ??? What then does it mean when it says is exempt for he says is exempt ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? he is liable ??? except ??? Here in this case, also, ??? except after we were The reason is this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper For scripture said: (Ex. 22) ??? No. ??? It once happened Your nation ??? curse ??? From where do we derive this? ??? If so, his son also Like that which was said by Rav Pinchas ??? a response Here in this case, also, ??? a response If so, after also Rav said ??? If so, his son also

דף פה,ב גמרא

something ??? after death What was decided? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna and thus was taught of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael for all yes. ??? was it made? ??? except ??? for behold! he said Torah (Deut. 13) No. ??? and not ??? upon it

דף פה,ב משנה

??? his father and his mother he is not liable until ??? of them ??? this ??? after death he is liable ??? after death is exempt

דף פה,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 20) his father and his mother ??? after death that it is possible Because he is liable ??? he is liable ??? Just as ??? he is not liable except ??? Even ??? he is not liable except ??? And furthermore, is a kal vachomer for just as ??? the one who did in it that did not have ??? No. he is liable in it after death ??? that did not have One who acts in it that did not have ??? is it not logical that did not have he is liable in it after death Scripture states: his father and his mother ??? after death This is satistfactory to R' ??? for him he read his father and his mother except to R' ??? What is there to say? as it is taught: (Lev. 20) a man a man Just as Scripture states: a man a man ??? the daughter of ??? who ??? his father and of its mother yes. for me except his father and his mother his father that did not have of its mother of its mother that did not have his father ??? Scripture states: his father and his mother ??? his father ??? of its mother ??? these are the words of R' ??? R' ??? says ??? one and one alone by itself until ??? to you the scripture ??? for him ??? for him ??? his father and his mother shall certainly die" And the other one This certain individual should bring himself ??? the daughter of ??? Is it not enough for him From the man a man ??? Torah ??? people ??? ??? One who acts in it that did not have ??? his reasoning is ??? Let us say, Behold! ??? for it teaches: one a Cuthean you ??? on ??? and if you ??? on ??? And another teaching If it was you ??? Not on ??? and not on ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? "true" there are. Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that No. ??? No. ??? No. ??? and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? "true" there are. and one master reasons that ??? lions there are. If so, we were where he teaches He ascended ??? except Learn from this ??? Learn from this

דף פה,ב משנה

??? from Israel he is not liable until ??? Rabbi Yehudah says until ??? and He shall make use in it as it is said (Deut. 24) ??? in it ??? his son Rabbi Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? he is obligated and the sages ??? who ??? a slave ??? son of ??? R' Yehudah he is obligated and the sages ???

דף פה,ב גמרא

and it was taught that came first it does not require ??? Rabbi Acha says: the son of of Raba ??? less than ??? There is this difference between them: he is required R' ??? sleeping What then? ??? a woman ??? What then? there are a way ??? objection or yes. a way ??? objection Is it not enough for him ??? A general principle: it is not necessary to teach this sleeping ??? upon it a woman ??? in the presence of ??? a way ??? objection or yes. a way ??? objection What then does it mean when it says The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. The Rabbis taught (Deut. 24) For he shall find a man ??? yes. for me except a man ??? a woman ??? Scripture states: ??? a man yes. for me except a man ??? between a woman or whether a man and the woman ??? a man a woman ??? a woman ??? Scripture states: did he die ??? This certain individual from all a place Another teaching For he shall find a man ??? one ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man and one ??? the his wife and one ??? and one a slave ??? and a child he is liable ??? and not ??? is exempt ??? or his brothers? or to one from ??? he is liable ??? ??? is exempt

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.