It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

It is because of this: that there is Is this not in which is not It once happened and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it Reish Lakish: says he does not ??? It is because of this: that there is ??? doubt whether and all ??? doubt whether No. her name ??? both of them. who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah as it is taught: (Ex. 12) and not ??? from him until mornings ??? from him until mornings etc. came the scripture to give One who acts after No. shall you do to say that do not ??? upon it these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. R' Yochanan ??? thus The reason is ??? the scripture this one does not come the scripture ??? Perhaps, ??? doubt whether her name ??? and Reish Lakish: ??? thus The reason is ??? the scripture this one does not come the scripture ??? Perhaps, Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? upon it and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? also this one certainly ??? doubt whether he derive it ??? a Tanna taught: with R' Yehudah as it is taught: ??? this and he returned ??? this ??? this and he returned ??? this ??? both "At the same time," or ??? both "At the same time," he is liable Rabbi Yehudah says "At the same time," he is liable "In the case of this one after that one," is exempt and Rabbi Yochanan also this one certainly Is this not in which is not It once happened he derive it This is like for he said: Rav Idi bar Avin Rav said ??? R' Yitzchak said that R' Yochanan said R' Yehuda says: It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean all No. shall you do ??? Is this not in which there is in it It once happened ??? upon it Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it except for ??? his fellow at the Name it is a problem of Rabbi Yehudah ??? Yehudah If it was ??? son of ??? it is a case of two different Tanaaim who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah If it was to Rabbi Yochanan There is no difficulty. this one according to his own reason this one according to the reason of his teacher It was taught there: ??? if on ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? and does not ??? but the sages say ??? and does not ??? This is the general rule: all the commandments No. shall you do in which there is to arise One who acts yes. we are guilty on its account that R' Yochanan said We do not have except this And furthermore, ??? He said to him R' Elazar in a case He said to him ??? as it is taught: compulsion ??? if Israel he he turns and does not ??? and if he is a priest ??? and does not he turns This is satistfactory for one for it teaches: ??? and not ??? except for one for it teaches: ??? and not ??? This is satisfactory regarding ??? It concerns itself except compulsion ??? and not ??? in what way does It concerns itself If it was ??? he stood for him ??? of him Rav said ??? For example, ??? to it ??? based on this lit: from after, Rav said If it was ??? for him If it was No. ??? all ??? and not anything She except Rav said ??? For example, ??? among the many This is satistfactory ??? among the many he (??? ) does not have except ??? he has ??? What is there to say? ??? to it on the understanding of many for he said: Ameimar Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? among the many he has ??? on the understanding of many he (??? ) does not have And, too, there is not in this case. And this is present here. ??? he said (Lev. 19) No. ??? (Lev. 5) ??? ??? he said (Deut. 24) No. ??? to his house ??? to him ??? the sun It concerns itself ??? and not ??? and not ??? there i.e., in another mishna immediately ??? yes. ??? and He will take restitution for He disagreed with this Rabbi Zeira Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. ??? of ??? did he die ???

דף טז,ב גמרא

there i.e., in another mishna a person son of restitution he ??? he that he came ??? And this is present here. ??? he said (Lev. 23) No. ??? etc. ??? etc. ??? to it ??? and not ??? and not ??? For it was taught in a baraita the commandments ??? from ??? No. ??? from ??? from ??? No. ??? from ??? from ??? before it was even the case that ??? tithe he gives to him ??? Yishmael for he said: Even ??? from ??? and to R' Yishmael also It concerns itself he was eating ??? except this And furthermore, ??? to this other teaching but: compulsion No. ??? say on the understanding of many he (??? ) does not have for a matter of freedom but: for a matter of a commandment he has ??? This is like ??? Rav Acha ??? Ravina that is not ??? and One who eats ??? Rav Yehudah said And if one he was eating ??? of the academy of ??? for him It is because of this: (Lev. 11) ??? on the land This certain individual he was eating ??? of the academy of ??? Rav Yehudah Abayye said: he ate ??? four ??? It is because of this: ??? on the land ??? It is because of this: (Deut. 14) ??? Rav said ??? ??? transgresses It is because of this: (Lev. 20) No. ??? Rav said ??? son of Abaye And if one ??? he crossed It is because of this: No. ??? Rabba said: son of Rav Huna ??? nine ??? one ??? six Hashem It is because of this: the son of and one It is because of this: an olive's volume roadkill Raba that R' Yochanan said even two This is only in the case Rav Yosef said: even one This is only in the case and does not disagree this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he ate he immersed and first tithe ??? Rav said he ate he immersed of tithe Responded ??? like who For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: he said R' Yosi It is possible No. ??? he is liable except on ??? that did not have ??? from him all the essence ??? from him terumah that is large and not ??? from him first tithe first tithe and not second tithe And even if tithe Responded from where do we learn Scripture states: (Deut. 12) No. ??? to eat ??? etc. and elsewhere in the scripture he says (Deut. 26) and he ate ??? Just as there tithe Responded Even here, tithe Responded and the Merciful One in the Torah says No. ??? Rav Yosef said ??? Rabbi Eliezer says it is not necessary to read the Name on tithe Responded of produce that may or may not have been properly tithed but the sages say

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.