It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

??? and Rabbi Meir ??? and they shall fear ???

דף ה,א משנה

??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? How so? ??? that he was he is liable to his fellow two hundred zuz ??? among them but: if ??? that he was he is liable ??? forty ??? Each and every one ??? forty

דף ה,א גמרא

From where in Tanach do we know this? Abayye said: it is said (Deut. 25) a wicked person ??? and it is said (Num. 35) a wicked person ??? a court בית דין Just as there yes. death ??? Even here, yes. ??? Rava said: in the case of (Deut. 19) as it was ??? to do his brothers? there is not in this case. If so, money or property also money or property ??? No. ???

דף ה,א משנה

yes. the witnesses ??? until ??? ??? How so? And they said acting as witnesses do we ??? so-and-so ??? ??? And they said to them how "You acting as witnesses for behold! ??? this or ??? this he was ??? that specific day in a place so-and-so yes. these ??? instead, they said to them how "You acting as witnesses for behold! "You ??? that specific day in a place so-and-so Behold! these ??? on ??? others ??? others ??? Even if hundred all of them ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? She -- this refers to and does not ??? except ??? alone

דף ה,א גמרא

From where do we derive this? Rav said ??? For scripture said: (Deut. 19) and behold until that is false ??? that is false ??? until ??? of giving witness of the academy of R' Yishmael a Tanna taught: (Deut. 19) ??? in it ??? until ??? of giving witness Rabba said: ??? two And they said ??? so-and-so ??? two And they said Is it not the case that ??? If it was ??? they saw ??? yes. these ??? And if not, Behold! these ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? Come and hear from this. Rabba said: ??? two And they said in Sura, ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? so-and-so ??? two And they said ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? in Nehardaya ??? If it was from daybreak ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? No. are they, ??? and if Is this not are they, ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? Come and learn from this. Rabba said: ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? so-and-so ??? two And they said ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath except it is dealing with a case where there are two on the Sabbath ??? so-and-so ??? and not only this, but Even if And they said the eve of the Shabbat ??? so-and-so ??? that he came ??? a person Is this not son of ??? he And what can we come and learn from this? ??? For this reason ??? One from them ??? he there are. ??? at the end of the teaching, Just as that do not thus ??? judgement ??? for him ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? of so-and-so ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? except on the eve of the Sabbaths ??? of so-and-so and not only this, but Even if And they said it is dealing with a case where there are two on the Sabbath ??? of so-and-so yes. these ??? that he came ??? a person son of ??? he and thus in the matter of restitutions for ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? except it is dealing with a case where there are two on the Sabbath ??? and not only this, but even And they said on the eve of the Sabbaths ??? that he came ??? a person Is this not son of restitution he ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? two And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? except the eve of the Shabbat ??? and not only this, but Even if And they said it is dealing with a case where there is only one. on the Sabbath ??? and it is dealing with a case where there are two on the Sabbath ??? yes. ??? that he came ??? a person son of restitution ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? She -- this refers to etc.

דף ה,ב גמרא

If it was ??? She -- this refers to Even if ??? the first also did not say R' Abahu ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? it was. except Rabba said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: if It is not except ??? One ??? If it was that it is possible ??? yes. ??? this one only. he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: it is a problem this particular ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? that is not ??? Raysh Lakish said ??? -- this refers to He said to him R' Elazar if She ??? all Israel who ??? Oftentimes are they, ??? in front of Rabbi Yochanan he came For This It once happened ??? Raysh Lakish said ??? -- this refers to He said to him Rabbi Yochanan if ??? -- this refers to all Israel who ??? he returns ??? to Rabbi ??? He said to him: ??? words ??? and not is what you say? Do you really mean that? for me in the name Let us say, ??? for he said: like Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Yochanan for he said: ??? He could say to you ??? I that they said to you Even if According to the sages, Up to this point, No. ??? They said: rabbis there i.e., in another mishna ??? that he came he turned But here, in this case, that it is possible this one that he came ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: to you I that they said Even if to Rabbi Yehudah Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehudah there i.e., in another mishna ??? because the whole world regarding Behold! are they, they stand But here, in this case, Behold! ??? and Behold! No. ???

דף ה,ב משנה

yes. the witnesses ??? until ??? justice. for behold! ??? say until ??? as it is said (Ex. 21) ??? under ??? And they said to them the sages Does it not clearly ??? say (Deut. 19) ??? to him as it was ??? to do his brothers? Consider this case: ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived If so, why is it said ??? under ??? It is possible From the hour ??? Therefore, scripture states: ??? under ??? this one are not ??? until ??? justice.

דף ה,ב גמרא

a Tanna taught: ??? says No. ??? yes. ??? he said his father My son, Is this not ??? he He said to him: ??? our rabbi, that do not ??? from justice. as it is taught: (Lev. 20) a man who ??? the daughter of his father or the daughter of of its mother yes. for me except the daughter of his father that did not have the daughter of of its mother the daughter of of its mother that did not have the daughter of his father the daughter of of its mother the daughter of his father from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? before it was even the case that it is said there are for me In justice, if ??? on the daughter of his father that did not have the daughter of of its mother the daughter of of its mother that did not have the daughter of his father the daughter of his father the daughter of of its mother is it not all the more so? this one ??? that do not ??? from justice. ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 18) ??? the daughter of your father or the daughter of ??? yes. for me except the daughter of his father that did not have the daughter of of its mother the daughter of of its mother that did not have the daughter of his father the daughter of his father the daughter of of its mother from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 18) ??? the daughter of ??? your father ??? your father ??? She before it was even the case that it is said there are for me from justice. Just as if ??? on the daughter of of its mother that did not have the daughter of his father the daughter of his father that did not have the daughter of of its mother the daughter of his father the daughter of of its mother is it not all the more so? this one ??? that do not ??? from justice. ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: a wicked person a wicked person ??? from where do we learn We come to compare ??? It was taught: Rabbi Yehuda said son of ??? if No. ??? until ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? of ??? that were say yes. the witnesses ??? until ??? He said to him: Shimon son of ??? if No. ??? blood ??? for behold! the sages said yes. the witnesses ??? until ??? both And there is no meaning to the word ??? until ??? both immediately ??? upon it R' Yehudah son of ??? that is not ??? except before Shimon son of ??? and all his days of R' Yehudah son of ??? he was ??? on ??? of that specific ??? and it was the case that His voice ??? the nation to say His voice of ??? he said my voice mine he Now you nkow tomorrow he did he die yes. His voice ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi Perhaps ??? he stood ??? So, too, ???

דף ה,ב משנה

by the mouth of two witnesses or three witnesses ??? the dead if ??? with the passage of the requisite number of years For what reason creates an exclusion the scripture in a case where there are three except ??? Just as three ??? ??? Even ??? ??? And from where do we learn Even if hundred Scripture states: witnesses R' Shimon says Just as two are not ??? until ??? both ??? Even three are not ??? until ??? And from where do we learn Even if hundred Scripture states: witnesses Rabbi Akiva says: does not come ??? except ??? upon it and to do ??? If so, ??? the scripture ??? transgression ??? transgression compared to the one case, how much more so the other! ??? the reward for ??? a commandment ??? a commandment for just as two Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found one from them ??? or is invalid, ??? nullification Even three Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found one from them ??? or is invalid, ??? nullification from where do we learn Even if hundred Scripture states: witnesses

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.