It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א משנה

he said Rabbi Yosei Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? souls but: ??? in the remainder of Rabbi says one ??? and one ??? souls when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case ??? of them but: at a time i.e., in a case that did not have ??? of them Just as ??? two ??? on the first ??? ???

דף ו,א גמרא

Rabba said: This is only in the case ??? all of them in the midst of so that ??? He said to him: Rav Acha ??? so that ??? How so? so that ??? for Rav, hundred ??? are they, He said to him: Each and every one in the midst of so that ??? of ??? Rabbi Akiva says: does not come the third etc. for just as two ??? He said to him: Rav ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? ??? He was silent. When he came before of Raba He said to him: (Deut. 19) ??? a thing ??? a thing the scripture ??? he said Rabbi Yosei Regarding what matters are we speaking? and etc. Just as ??? two ??? in what way does say them Rabba said: thus ??? them ??? or ??? If it was They said: ??? they came Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found one from them ??? or is invalid, ??? nullification If it was They said: ??? they came Just as ??? two ??? on the first ??? ??? it was said: Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said the halacha is like R' Yosi Rav ??? says The halacha is like Rabbi

דף ו,ב משנה

they were two ??? that specific ??? this and two ??? that specific ??? this and one ??? in it in the midst of at a time i.e., in a case where some of them see these those Behold! these giving witness One And if not, Behold! these two ??? For this reason if ??? One from them ??? he there are. ??? Rabbi Yosei says: In reality lit: In the world yes. ??? until ??? two ??? in it as it is said (Deut. 17) by the mouth of two witnesses Another thing: by the mouth of two witnesses that the Sanhedrin should not be ???

דף ו,ב גמרא

Rav said ??? son of ??? Rav said from where do we learn ??? is isolated ??? that it is invalid as it is said (Deut. 17) No. ??? by the mouth of a single witness What then does it mean when it says one Shall I say a single witness actually and really ??? to it by the mouth of two witnesses Rather, what can we conclude? one one one Another teaching is like this: No. ??? by the mouth of a single witness ??? two ??? that specific one ??? this and one ??? this And there is no meaning to the word ??? this one for that one that do not combine together and not only this, but even "In the case of this one after that one," ??? one yes. combine together He said to him: Rav ??? now for just as one ??? this and one ??? this That this ??? Look, all of it It once happened and that one ??? Look, all of it It once happened is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? "In the case of this one after that one," That this Look, a fraction ??? and that one Look, a fraction ??? He said to him No. ??? except ??? ??? Rabba said: if they were ??? ??? or ??? one who sees those particular combine together Rabba said: ??? where they said even ??? himself and even ??? Rav Nachman said giving witness is isolated ??? ??? As it is written No. ??? by the mouth of a single witness ??? souls he ??? but: ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? souls ??? Why is it that We have learnt in a Mishna: he there are. ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? He said to him Rav ??? and who it has to Rabbi Yosei: This reason out the logic. For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Yosei says: ??? because it was ??? He said to him This certain individual Rabbi Yosei son of Yehudah She as it is taught: Rabbi Yosei son of Yehudah says ??? it is not necessary ??? on account of that did not have ??? except ??? between ??? Another thing: ??? two witnesses that the Sanhedrin should not be ??? in front of Raba ??? Raba ??? And how does he act? thus For it was taught in a mishna: that the Sanhedrin should not be ??? Raba ??? it was. know Just as where they did They said: ??? he There was not know

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.