PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13
Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits
This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.
This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."
I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף טו,א גמרא
and thus ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba all the vessels the one who did Moses ??? from here and onwards ??? But why? And let him say and thus ??? It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Num. 7) ??? and not ??? I would say ??? or ??? or ??? Rav Pappa said: Scripture states: (Num. 4) who ??? with them." ??? the scripture in songs now ??? the Merciful One who ??? why do I have If it was it is not written: the Merciful One ??? then I might incorrectly say: Behold! he ??? for it is the case that the writing of and thus ??? the Merciful One ??? and not ??? a Tanna taught: two ??? where they said ??? and not ??? words Rav Chisdah said For scripture said: (Nech. 12) ??? two ??? that are large ??? from by ??? What then does it mean when it says that are large Shall I say ??? The greatness actually and really Let him say ??? except that are large ??? who that it is possible ??? in the presence of heaven? For it was taught: it is said ??? livestock (Lev. 1) a woman ??? (Lev. 1) a woman ??? at Minchah (Lev. 2) a woman ??? This teaches ??? who gives much and one who gives little but only that he concentrate his heart ??? except that is large ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? chametz For it was taught in a baraita The thangkgiving-offering it was she entered from ??? that are ??? that are two ??? three ??? twenty ??? ten ??? and ten ??? three sectarians. ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama yes. ??? except ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) What is the reason? ??? Just as Jerusalem a thing ??? of it ??? Even The Courtyard --- a thing ??? of it ??? because ??? a thangkgiving-offering in the courtyard who No. ??? except ??? Just as Jerusalem a thing ??? of it and he goes out from it ??? Even The Courtyard --- a thing ??? of it but that which is coming out from it ??? If it was Just as there chametz Even here, chametz ??? Minchah-offering of chametz who that it is possible
דף טו,ב גמרא
And if you say ??? them ??? and make kiddush. in them? For it is written (Lev. 6) No. ??? chametz ??? and Raysh Lakish said even ??? No. ??? chametz Why is it that No. ??? It is because of this: where it is not possible in what way does ??? two ??? he ??? in the case of kiddush in the hour of ??? on Yom Tov ??? on Yom Tov yes. ??? make kiddush. ??? Yom Tov (holiday) ??? thus ??? for him Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, ??? day ??? of him. ??? that until ??? day ??? yes. ??? the house of ??? by night for Abaye said: from where do we learn that do not ??? the house of ??? by night as it is said (Num. 9) by day ??? ??? by day ??? by night yes. ??? Therefore, No. ??? The Rabbis taught ??? of a thangkgiving-offering ??? on all ??? and on all the stone that is large ??? And it is said: (Ps. 30) ??? Hashem For ??? etc. ??? of ??? and there are ??? of leprous plague The one who said ??? As it is written (Ps. 91) ??? No. ??? and the one who said ??? As it is written (Ps. 91) ??? And it is said: (Ps. 91) who dwells ??? on high." in the shadow of my field ??? until (Ps. 91) For you Hashem ??? on high." ??? and he returns i.e., repeats and says (Ps. 3) "A mizmor of David when he fled because of Avshalom his son Hashem Just as his rabbi; those who trouble me; until to Hashem ??? on Your nation ??? Rabbi Yehoshua son of Levi said them ??? in what way does does he act? thus For didn't R' Yehoshua say son of Levi is forbidden ??? in words of Torah ??? that I So rather, For he said is forbidden That there are ??? If it was That there are ??? is forbidden And naught else For it was taught in a mishna: ??? on ??? he (a portion) does not have In reality lit: In the world that comes this one it was said: He ascended that R' Yochanan said ??? on account of that do not We recall in that place heaven on ??? a court בית דין walking and two ??? This comes to imply ??? judgement in the presence of a thangkgiving-offering ??? For it is written (Nech. 12) ??? after them ??? Sarai Yehudah thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: a court walking and two ??? a court after them How so? ??? Rabbi Chiyya and Rabbi Shimon ??? One says -- this refers to opposite -- this refers to and one says -- this refers to after -- this refers to The one who said -- this refers to opposite -- this refers to ??? The one who said -- this refers to after -- this refers to ??? to the court bet din We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: -- this refers to after -- this refers to ??? It is because of this: That it comes ??? to it except for one for he said: -- this refers to opposite -- this refers to both of them. together ??? for one for he said: -- this refers to after -- this refers to one who ??? this one all that did not have she was made in all these We have learnt in a Mishna: And even if ??? in one from all these Behold! both of them. one a commandment She except that R' Yochanan said
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.