PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

by the mouth of prophet ??? and by the mouths of prophet ??? all that did not have she was made in all these ??? it was said: Rav Huna he said in all these We have learnt in a Mishna: Rav ??? he said in one from all these We have learnt in a Mishna: Rav Huna he said in all these We have learnt in a Mishna: his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? in the future in going and Ezra male, in reality he ??? Rav ??? he said in one from all these We have learnt in a Mishna: his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going and Ezra ??? made kiddush, even though that is not are they, the Urim v'Tumim ??? Raba for Rav, ??? all that did not have she was made in all these It was taught by in one from all these Come and hear: Abba Shaul says: two ??? they were ??? lower one ??? lower one ??? in all these upper one No. ??? in all these except ??? that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not of the Urim and Tumim. lower one ??? with me" the land enters for the sake of lit. in the name of and they eat in that place simple offerings but not second tithe and a fellowship they eat in that place simple offerings and second tithe upper one that did not have it was ??? with me" the land they were enters in that place and they eat in that place simple offerings but not second tithe and a fellowship yes. they eat in that place No. simple offerings and not second tithe And on account of what No. ??? that do not they add on the city and on ??? except ??? and prophet and the Urim v'Tumim and to the Sanhedrin of ??? and for what reason ??? For what reason ??? this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? except For what reason ??? because of ??? of Jerusalem it was ??? She ??? From here ??? She as it is taught: Thus said Rabbi Eliezer I hear as they were we do build ??? they make curtains ??? except ??? we do build ??? we do build ??? Rabbi Yehoshua said: I hear ??? even though that do not the house of they eat The holiest of holy offerings despite the fact that do not curtains simple offerings and second tithe despite the fact that do not wall because of ??? the first ??? in the future in going Is this not from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Eliezer reasoned No. ??? in the future in going He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi From where can you derive Perhaps everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world "Kedushah" the first ??? in the future in going Master, What then does it mean when it says that has heard for him he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Master, What then does it mean when it says that has heard for him he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: And if you say curtains to R' Eliezer why do I have ??? in reality except Behold! ??? as it is taught: Thus said Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi For what reason ??? the sages those ??? My son, ??? they found these ??? but: ??? the land Perhaps, his reasoning is "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going We challenge that from the following baraita he said R' Yishmael ??? And so these only. they were Does it not clearly ??? say (Deut. 3) ??? a city all ??? Og ??? all ??? wall its height except For what reason ??? the sages those ??? My son, ??? they found these ??? now this one say ??? that is not Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements ??? except they found these ??? and not these only. except all ??? into your hand ??? wall since the days of Joshua bin Nun all the commandments these ??? of it because of ??? the first ??? in the future in going it is a problem For R' Yishmael son of ??? Yishmael son of ??? If you wish, I would say it is a case of two different Tanaaim who follow the reasoning ??? For R' Yishmael son of ??? If you wish, I would say one ??? R' Elazar son of ??? he said as it is taught: R' Elazar son of ??? says (Lev. 25) who ??? wall despite the fact that do not to him now and it was the case that to him before ???

דף טז,ב גמרא

??? in the courtyard ??? from him ??? in the courtyard From where do we derive this? R' Elazar said It is written one says (Num. 19) a tabernacle Hashem tamei and It is written one says (Num. 19) for make kiddush. Hashem tamei ??? he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? this one ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. as it is taught: R' Elazar says if it is said a tabernacle why is it said make kiddush. and if it is said make kiddush. why is it said a tabernacle Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said a tabernacle It is not said make kiddush. I was says on a tabernacle ??? he is liable for behold! who has been anointed with oil of anointing and on make kiddush. No. ??? he is liable and if it is said make kiddush. It is not said a tabernacle I was says on make kiddush. ??? he is liable for behold! ??? the sanctity of the world and on a tabernacle No. ??? he is liable ??? it is said a tabernacle ??? it is said make kiddush. Rabbi Eliezer thus ??? has a problem ??? a tabernacle ??? make kiddush. and make kiddush. ??? a tabernacle ??? or This and this make kiddush. or This and this a tabernacle a tabernacle and make kiddush. why do I have Learn from this both This is satisfactory make kiddush. ??? a tabernacle As it is written (Lev. 26) and I have given ??? except a tabernacle ??? make kiddush. From where do we derive this? Shall I say From the fact that it is written (Num. 10) ??? who were carrying ??? This certain individual ??? it is written except from here (Ex. 25) "and they shall make for me make kiddush. ??? and then it is written (Ex. 25) ??? who I ??? in the shape of ??? or ??? so that ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? except ??? yes. No. ??? No. there is someone who teaches this as referring ??? or ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? except but: ??? even though that is not ??? and thus he comes to say ??? or ??? so that ??? except he is liable How so? ??? for there is of it ??? and How so? ??? of it ??? of it ??? -- this refers to ??? in reality She for there is of it ??? and pilgrimage festivals and how much time is the duration of the measure ??? They disagreed about this, R' Isaac son of Nachmeni and one ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi: And there are those who say it was Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi: and one ??? R' Isaac son of Nachmeni And there are those who say it was R' Shimon bar Nachmani One says ??? That this verse and one says ??? (II Chron. 7) and all the Children of Israel saw ??? the fire and honor." Hashem on the house ??? earthwards" on ??? to Hashem For good For In reality lit: In the world his mercy The Rabbis taught ??? on ??? And thus it says (I Kings 1) ??? the daughter of "satisfied" ??? earth ??? on ??? And thus it says (I Kings 8) ??? on his knees ??? -- this refers to ??? and pilgrimage festivals and thus says (Gen. 37) ??? I ??? and your brother ??? to you ??? he is required Raba It is necessary for him ??? or it is not necessary ??? We have a tradition that ??? No. We have a tradition that ???