PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כ,א גמרא

??? in it to eat Our mishna ??? in it to eat ??? in it to eat and he said No. ??? and not ??? and so when ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? that did not have he eats Rav Ashi said: It was taught by ??? he eats to you If so, what is there to say? What would you have said? ??? for him ??? The Rabbis taught ??? prohibits ??? if You say ??? he is liable And if not, is exempt if You say ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? he Abayye said: This is what he means: ??? prohibits ??? if You say ??? he is equivalent. he is liable And if not, is exempt And from where do you derive ??? As it is written (Lev. 5) or ??? For ??? also As it is written (Num. 30) all ??? and all ??? except From where can you derive ??? it is written: (Num. 30) or ??? on ??? also it is written (Lev. 5) for all who ??? a person ??? except Abayye said: ??? from here (Num. 30) and if they were ??? upon it or ??? who ??? on ??? And even ??? he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: in what way ??? herself ??? Rava said: In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? Is this not ??? he is equivalent. and thus he comes to say ??? also ??? the scripture between ??? ??? (Num. 30) and if the house of ??? or ??? on ??? etc. ??? Abaye said ??? he is equivalent. And Rabba said Is this not ??? he is equivalent. They challenged him from this teaching: whichever ??? is said in the Torah One who says Behold! by the that did not have he eats meat or in the case that one is not shall drink wine ??? in it his father ??? in it so-and-so ??? in it ??? son of ??? who saw Jerusalem ??? is forbidden and Shmuel said This is only in the case ??? came ??? the day This is satisfactory ???

דף כ,ב גמרא

except to Raba it is a problem He could say to you Raba ??? and so go ahead and say thus Who is ??? is said in the Torah One who says Behold! by the that did not have he eats meat or in the case that one is not shall drink wine ??? in it his father ??? in it so-and-so and Shmuel said This is only in the case ??? came ??? the day What is the reason? Scripture states: (Num. 30) a man For reside ??? to Hashem until ??? In the matter ??? in it his father This is obvious! ??? in it ??? son of ??? It is necessary to teach this for him You might have thought that I would say that immediately and so when No. ??? he also forbids it. For ??? also did not occur upon it prohibits and that one Is this not ??? he Come and learn from this. And even R' Yochanan derive it about this teaching of Raba when ??? came that R' Yochanan said ??? No. he eats to you ??? No. he eats to you ??? When Rav Dimi came Rabbi Yochanan said: he eats and not he eats that is false ??? from here (Lev. 19) No. ??? and not ??? without worth ??? from here (Ex. 20) No. ??? in that place Hashem your God ??? transgresses (Num. 30) without ??? His word They challenged him from this teaching: without worth and that is false one there are. Is this not ??? on that which was in the past Even that is false also on that which was in the past Perhaps, ??? and not ??? that is false he something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has And what does it mean when it says a thing one there are. ??? one ??? As it is taught: (Ex. 20) ??? (Deut. 5) ??? one ??? Just as that do not It is possible the mouth for a matter of for just as that do not ??? It is possible to hear This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna ??? one ??? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? son of love for he said: Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? women ??? the day So says the Torah. For scripture said: ??? all ??? and Behold! ??? Because ??? also ??? except Here in this case, for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion should bring himself except in the same way ??? on without worth thus in the same way ??? also on that is false ??? except I would say in the same way ??? on that is false thus in the same way ??? also on without worth This is obvious! This Is this not and that one Is this not What would you have said? Like that which was said by for him Rav ??? No. ??? A general principle: