PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

Come and learn from this. ??? for him And if you wish, I would say in the same way ??? sacrifice on that is false thus in the same way sends sacrifice on without worth And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva ??? on that which was in the past ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Which is it ??? without worth "to learn Mishna has sworn ??? to a person ??? that is false "??? has sworn I would say "??? has sworn For he came ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? R' Abahu said that R' Yochanan said ??? and not ??? that is false ??? (Lev. 19) fill ??? he eats and not he eats transgresses (Num. 30) without ??? His word Which is it ??? without worth "to learn Mishna has sworn ??? to a person Rav Pappa said: this one of Rabbi Abihu Is this not in a clarifying explanation it was said: except from a derivation it was said: for he said: Rav Idi bar Avin Rav said ??? Rav said Isaac that R' Yochanan said R' Yehuda says: It is because of this: R' Yosi the Gallilean all No. shall you do ??? Is this not in which there is in it It once happened ??? upon it and in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it except ??? his fellow at the Name "From where do we derive this? has sworn that R' Yochanan said It is because of this: ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 20) No. ??? in that place Hashem your God ??? For No. ??? a court בית דין of ??? yes. ??? that specific but: a court בית דין of a bed ??? that specific ??? that specific He said to him Rav ??? Perhaps thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the Merciful One No. ??? A general principle: If it was it is written For No. ??? now As it is written For No. ??? Hashem Hashem he ??? but: a court בית דין of a bed ??? that specific ??? that specific ??? without worth ??? that is false From where do we derive this? R' Yochanan that are his he said ??? two occasions if he does not one topic ??? without worth ??? one topic ??? that is false you shall of it R' Abahu This ??? that is false How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? that did not have he eats he ate Is this not in which there is in it It once happened he So rather, for he said: ??? and not he ate This who ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: ??? a loaf -- this refers to the day and he crossed the day and not ??? Rabbi Yochanan and Reish Lakish: who both say he does not ??? R' Yochanan said: he does not ??? It is because of this: ??? Is this not in which is not It once happened and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it and Reish Lakish: he said he does not ??? It is because of this: ??? doubt whether ??? doubt whether No. her name ??? and R' Abahu said shall be ??? and not ??? and what is the difference here, Rabba said: in a clarifying explanation ??? Torah ??? that is false ??? Just as without worth on that which was in the past Even that is false also on that which was in the past ??? Rabbi ??? to Rabbi ??? that did not have he eats a loaf -- this refers to ??? that did not have ??? that did not have ??? he is not liable except One This is ??? on ??? and on ??? sacrifice an elevation-offering and descends This is ??? Is this not ??? and not ??? that is not ??? No. ??? and not ??? This is ??? sacrifice an elevation-offering and descends but: ??? and not ??? No. and R' Yishmael She for he said: he is not liable except on the future in going but: ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

I would say at the end of the teaching, This is ??? without worth ??? on ??? and on ??? is exempt This is ??? What then does it mean when it says Is this not ??? and not ??? that is not ??? No. This is ??? is exempt ??? but: ??? and not ??? on ??? he is liable sacrifice And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva ??? on that which was in the past ??? this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? But the beginning of the teaching, R' Yishmael She But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Yishmael and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Akiva All of it Rabbi Akiva and the beginning of the teaching, Is this not ??? and not ??? except ??? he eats and not he ate ??? but: sacrifice ??? and what is the difference here, ??? he arises ??? he arises ??? that did not have he eats he ate Any thing that was he is liable ??? They posed this difficulty: Rabbi Akiva in all the Torah All of it like Rabbi Shimon he reasons, ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: Any thing that was ??? And they did not say an olive's volume except in the matter of sacrifice In justice, he who seeks ??? in reality and that one where they do disagree? Here in this case, to make you acknowledge ??? is a law established by the Rabbis that even atop על גבי That there are to say Because ??? he is liable ??? also he is liable Come and hear from this ??? or, perhaps, in reality ??? he reasons for himself. and here in this other case, we were The reason is Because ??? he is liable ??? also he is liable Come and hear: ??? to him Rabbi Akivah ??? Any thing that was he is liable for this he is liable and if ??? Let us say, them I in all the Torah All of it like Rabbi Shimon ??? for me to their words is a law established by the Rabbis he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them To me in all the Torah All of it like Rabbi Shimon ??? for me ??? for me from this Because ??? he is liable ??? also he is liable and they said to him: rabbis No. Come and hear: Rabbi Akiva says: a Nazir ??? his bread ??? and there is so that to combine an olive's volume he is liable and if You might have thought in reality like Rabbi Shimon he reasons for himself. why do I have to combine And furthermore, We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is liable and R' Shimon exempts and we were at of it why is it that he is liable ??? he Rav And for Shmuel and R' Yochanan who both say ??? items ??? with items ??? and Reish Lakish: he said If it was you "one who finds" except If it was ??? the measure and who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis If it was ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? for he said: a person ??? himself in all that he was And if it enters your mind to argue that in reality like R' Shimon he reasons for himself. Any thing that was also ??? he except Is this not Learn from this in reality ??? he reasons for himself. "Hear!" ??? They said to him: to Rabbi ??? and not Consider this case: ??? the son of that I Consider this case: that which was sanctified for Temple use this one in the case of the value of ??? Consider this case: ??? also ??? he is equivalent. Consider this case: ??? except