PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

??? who seeks Raba ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? until That there are an olive's volume For we say it. ??? a thing food we say it. Consider this case: ??? also ??? He said to them: ??? in the wilderness and sends sacrifice for this ??? and sends ??? and not Consider this case: ??? we say it. and that one ??? and a sinner he Consider this case: a Nazir sends its sacrifice on ??? we say it. and that one sends sacrifice ??? for him wine; he that he came ??? Consider this case: that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? for himself we say it. and that one ??? on the whole world all of it he Behold! ??? his reasoning is yes. the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? Rabba said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? the words of all are in all that he was What is the reason? ??? also ??? he is equivalent. Rabba said: It is a disagreement ??? he eats but: ??? the words of all are in all that he was This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? also just like what people normally say, Come and learn from this. Rav Pappa said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? the words of all are in all that he was What is the reason? ??? also immediately that is not ??? lest ??? he is equivalent. They challenged him from this teaching: two ??? combine together two oaths yes. ??? R' Meir says ??? like oaths and if You might have thought he is liable in all that he was why do I have to combine for he said: food ??? by the ??? food ??? by the ??? If so, why is it that ??? the end of the end of ??? there is not in this case. ??? there is not in this case. ??? for he said: food ??? by the ??? regarding oaths for he said: ??? that did not have he eats ??? why is it that yes. combine together Rav said ??? that I oaths from the midst of ??? yes. ??? If so, R' Meir says ??? like oaths This is satisfactory oaths Because ??? except ??? why is it that No. ??? Rabbi Meir says: oaths ??? and he does not have ??? Ravina he said and thus he comes to say Rav ??? in the matter of ??? For this teaching in the matter of sacrifice ??? the value of ??? This comes to imply ??? rabbis there are the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? For it was taught: a loaf -- this refers to that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? between he between his fellow from by For this reason there are to it redemption a loaf -- this refers to by the that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? he from by his fellow No. from by For this reason It does not have redemption These are the words of Rabbi Meir.

דף כב,ב גמרא

But the sages say: between he or whether his fellow No. from by on account of that do not the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? One of these and one of these No. from by on account of that do not the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir But the sages say: he from by and his fellow No. from by If so, Rabbi Meir says: ??? like oaths except ??? he that is not ??? this one the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? in them? For didn't R' Meir say yes. the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? A general principle: ??? is a law established by the Rabbis he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them To me yes. the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? A general principle: ??? for me Regardless, ??? like oaths And the rabbbis oaths that it is possible of Rav ??? there is not in this case. of Rav ??? Rabba said: ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? is exempt he is required Raba ??? that did not have he eats ??? immediately for he said: that did not have he eats ??? or, perhaps, immediately ??? something ??? he in all that he was ??? he is required Raba ??? that did not have he eats ??? immediately ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? or, perhaps, immediately that is not ??? for him ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Rav Ashi a Nazir who said ??? that did not have he eats ??? a law established by the Torah he For ??? or, perhaps, immediately for he said: that did not have he eats ??? Come and hear: ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is liable and R' Shimon exempts and we were at of it why is it that he is liable ??? he Rav And for Shmuel and R' Yochanan that they said ??? items ??? with items ??? he said If it was you "one who finds" except If it was ??? the measure and who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis If it was ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi ??? for he said: a person ??? himself in all that he was Hey, isn't it the case that roadkill ??? he and so when ??? to join with the body of a Nazir is comparable and the reason ??? this one No. ??? Learn from this except ??? who seeks Raba ??? that did not have he eats ??? that until That there are an olive's volume for it is the case that roadkill ??? is comparable and the reason ??? this one No. ??? No. ??? Is this not son of food he A general principle: roadkill the daughter of food and a lion he ???

דף כב,ב משנה

??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is not liable except One ??? that did not have he eats or in the case that one is not shall drink he ate ??? he is liable two ??? that did not have he eats he ate bread ??? and bread ??? and bread ??? he is not liable except One ??? that did not have he eats bread ??? and bread ??? and bread ??? he ate he is liable on all One and one ??? that did not have shall drink ??? in great quantity he is not liable except One ??? that did not have shall drink wine and oil ??? he is liable on all One and one ??? that did not have he eats he ate they eat those that are not ??? as regard to eating, ??? those that are not ??? is exempt ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is liable and R' Shimon exempts he said ??? for me if ??? the day This is only in the case he ate ??? Behold! his wife is forbidden

דף כב,ב גמרא

he said Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: Shmuel said ??? that did not have he eats ??? he is liable If you wish, I would say reason out the logic. And if you wish, I would say he read If you wish, I would say reason out the logic. for he said: for him a person ??? something ??? And if you wish, I would say he read drink are in the general category food for he said: ??? from where do we learn ??? that it are in the general category food as it is said (Deut. 14) "And you shall eat before Hashem your God in a place who ??? was his name in that place tithe ???