PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

??? wine; he and then it is written "And you shall eat and Perhaps by way of lit., through the hands of ??? for he said: Rabbah son of Shmuel ??? except Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov from here (Deut. 14) ??? in all who ??? your soul in the morning ??? and For a payment wine wine; he and then it is written "And you shall eat and Perhaps So, here, by way of lit., through the hands of ??? the reward for it is written something ??? and Perhaps of figs ??? as it is taught: he ate of figs ??? honey and milk and he has entered ??? and a slave he is liable except ??? the reward for the reward for ??? Just as there wine Even here, wine Rabba said: Even We also ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is not liable except One If you say, This is satisfactory drink are in the general category food It is necessary to teach this for him a Tanna ??? he is liable except One except If you say, drink Is this not are in the general category food ??? that did not have he eats he ate One who acts work who It is necessary to teach this ??? he is liable except One He said to him Abaye Rather, what can we conclude? drink are in the general category food I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? that did not have he eats or in the case that one is not shall drink he ate ??? he is liable two immediately for he said: that did not have he eats ??? for him ??? For he said that did not have shall drink why is it that he is liable Watch out for leading vav !! And even he said that did not have shall drink two times who ??? both He said to him: there i.e., in another mishna for he said: that did not have shall drink and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had he said that did not have he eats ??? are in the general category food ??? food are in the general category drink ??? but: he said ??? that did not have he eats or in the case that one is not shall drink he ate ??? What then does it mean when it says he is not liable except One If so, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is not liable except One Let the Tanna teach: ??? that did not have he eats or in the case that one is not shall drink he is not liable except One and all the more so that did not have he eats ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? that I Here in this case, immediately for he said: that did not have he eats and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had he said that did not have shall drink ??? food for he said: food ??? She Rav Ashi said ??? also ??? that did not have he eats he ate they eat that do not ??? as regard to eating, ??? that do not ??? is exempt this one ??? he is liable But why? this one ??? that did not have he eats he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Perhaps for he said: both ??? that did not have he eats ??? that did not have ??? that did not have he eats he ate bread ??? and Perhaps ??? it was. for him to say ??? and Perhaps ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected to say bread ??? and Perhaps bread ??? to eat ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected to say bread ??? and of ??? and of ???

דף כג,ב גמרא

and Perhaps by way of lit., through the hands of ??? I would say and thus of ??? and thus of ??? bread bread why do I have "Hear!" of him ??? that did not have shall drink ??? in great quantity he is not liable except One ??? This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna that you said ??? for him bread bread ??? except Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says it was. to say Perhaps ??? Rav Pappa said: Here in this case, ??? before him is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that he was to him to say ??? that did not have shall drink these and Perhaps these he that is not ??? except for he said: ??? that is not ??? For example, these Perhaps For example, these that is not ??? except For example, he said: ??? that did not have shall drink ??? these and Perhaps ??? these he that is not ??? this one we do not have ??? I would say that did not have shall drink these ??? Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? he said ??? in it his fellow is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) for he said: to him ??? with me" wine and oil ??? to him to say ??? that did not have shall drink Your nation wine and oil ??? why do I have ??? on all One and one It was taught there: give for me ??? in which there is for me into your hand ??? that do not to you ??? anything he is not liable except One ??? that do not to you ??? he is liable on all One and one And R' Yochanan said Even if ??? They disagreed about this, Rav Acha and Ravina One says ??? No. ??? and one says ??? also ??? Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says Rabba said: thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? for it is the case that If it was ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? both Here in this case, If it was You might have thought ??? why is it that ??? that did not have he eats ??? this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? that did not have he eats he ate they eat that do not ??? as regard to eating, ??? that do not ??? is exempt and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by ??? that did not have he eats he ate ??? he is liable What is different about the beginning of the teaching, this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper And what is different about the end of the teaching ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? also ??? why is it that ??? he Rav And for Shmuel and Rabbi Yochanan that they said ??? items ??? with items ??? he said If it was you "one who finds" except If it was ??? the measure and who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis If it was ??? who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi ??? for he said: a person ??? himself in all that he was This is satisfactory Rabbi Yochanan did not say ??? to it ??? in accordance with the words of The entirety except Reish Lakish: What is the reason? did not say ??? Yochanan He could say to you For say prohibits ???