PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כו,א גמרא

one ??? Rav ??? R' Yishmael says he is not liable except on the future ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 5) ??? or ??? yes. for me except items in which there is of them the evil ??? that do not have in them the evil ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 5) or ??? For ??? yes. for me except ??? on that which was in the past from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 5) for all who ??? a person ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi Yishmael says ??? or ??? He said to him: Rabbi Akiva If so, yes. for me except items in which there is of them ??? and the evil items that do not have in them the evil ??? from where do we learn He said to him: ??? the scripture He said to him: if ??? the scripture ??? the scripture ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? Rabbi Akiva to R' Yishmael that R' Yochanan said R' Yishmael ??? Rabbi Nechonya ben Hakanah that he was ??? all the Torah All of it are in the general category and creates an exclusion ??? also ??? are in the general category and creates an exclusion Rabbi Akiva ??? ??? a man also -- this refers to that he was ??? all the Torah All of it ??? also ??? What then does it mean when it says R' ??? who derives an explanation from ??? as it is taught: or ??? For ??? or ??? for all who ??? a person ??? had a vision The entirety What then does it mean when it says ??? In all things And what does it mean when it says ??? a thing a commandment and R' Yishmael he expounds. A general principle: and creates an exclusion or ??? For ??? A general principle: ??? or ??? creates an exclusion for all who ??? a person and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? Even all ??? to include Even if items that do not have in them the evil ??? even items in which there is of them the evil ??? on that which was in the past ??? I R' Yitzchak said is equivalent ??? or ??? who ??? It is because of this: (Num. 30) ??? His word ??? -- this refers to that do not ??? It is because of this: ??? His word except It is because of this: ??? Rav Isaac son of Avin: he said Scripture states: or ??? For ??? who ??? and not ??? he has fulfilled his obligation this ??? and not ??? before ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 5) a person ??? creates an exclusion ??? creates an exclusion ??? from him ??? from him ??? It is possible ??? from him valued him, and Scripture states: ??? on ??? he he is liable and he is not liable on ??? Mar said: a person ??? creates an exclusion ??? How so? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? Rav ??? For are they, they stand ??? of Rav Master, he said ??? Rav said Master, he said ??? Rav said For they came in front of Rav he said ??? He said to him: Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one and I ??? He said to him: your heart, ??? from him ??? from him ??? It is possible ??? from him valued him, and Therefore, scripture states: ??? from him on ??? he he is liable and he is not liable on ??? in the west This is satisfactory ??? It concerns itself without valued him, and For example, he said: ??? that did not have he eats bread ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? except valued him, and without ??? How so? How should we understand this? For example, he said: ??? that did not have he eats bread ??? of ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? for him ??? immediately ??? them we were ??? except Rabbi Eliezer said this and this One She Rav Yosef disagreed Perhaps, valued him, and without ??? No. It concerns itself Hey, isn't it the case that It concerns itself For example, he said: ??? that did not have he eats bread ??? to be picked up bread ??? and is credited lit, rises in his hand of ??? She ??? for him ??? he that is not know for him Abaye said to him: anything ??? for him sacrifice except why is it that ??? in his hands ??? he ??? other than this Abaye said to him: According to Rav Yosef the end of the end of sacrifice that he came ??? He ascended That this bread Regardless, ??? he and Rav Yosef said: to you immediately and so when know for him ??? he ??? of him ??? valued him, and he Raba brought this very question ??? both this and this in his hand What then? He said to him: Behold! ??? in his hand he is liable ??? Behold! ??? valued him, and in his hand but exempt him Rav Ashi said ??? If it was ??? Behold! ??? in his hand he is liable If it was ??? valued him, and ??? Behold! ??? valued him, and in his hand but exempt him He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi anything ??? except It is because of this: valued him, and anything ??? except It is because of this: ??? except there is no difference Raba brought this very question ???

דף כו,ב גמרא

What is an example of one ??? on that which was in the past If it was ??? he If it was that is not know ??? he He said to him in the case of one who says I know ??? -- this refers to forbidden but: Really? know if we are guilty on its account sacrifice or Is this not like who ??? for he said: ??? sacrifice her name ??? even you say rabbis Up to this point, does not disagree rabbis upon it ??? except in all the Torah All of it ??? he But here, in this case, ??? he ??? the Torah All of it No. ??? Is this not ??? sacrifice ??? and here in this other case, ??? even rabbis ??? Ravina brought this very question ??? "on has sworn a loaf ??? upon it What then? ??? for him Master, except burdened ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him ??? sends sacrifice on ??? No. ??? yes. sends sacrifice on ??? Shmuel said ??? in his heart It is necessary for him ??? in his lips as it is said (Lev. 5) ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and not Watch out for leading vav "And in the hearts of ??? in his heart from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 5) for all who ??? a person ??? this one ??? it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? and not Watch out for leading vav "And in the hearts of and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? in his heart from where do we learn Rav Sheshet said This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? and not ??? in his heart to discharge the mitzvah in his lips and not ??? in his heart ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: for all who ??? except ??? it is a problem Rav Sheshet said ??? and so go ahead and say thus ??? and not ??? in his heart to discharge the mitzvah bread ??? bread ??? in his heart to discharge the mitzvah bread ??? bread ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: for all who ??? a person They challenged him from this teaching: (Deut. 23) "one who finds" ??? and You did yes. for me except ??? in his lips ??? in his heart from where do we learn Scripture states: (Ex. 35) all ??? heart It is different there in that case As it is written all ??? heart ??? It is because of this: where they did terumah and holy offerings two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? This is satistfactory ??? yes. ??? except ??? What is there to say? are they, Those who are ill and holy offerings and Those who are ill ??? No. we complete it