PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לא,א גמרא

??? suspended ??? witnesses Therefore, scripture states: ??? that is false ??? ??? from where do we learn ??? who was siting before his rabbi; ??? and obligation ??? from where do we learn that did not have ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Ex. 23) ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn ??? he sees his rabbi; ??? In justice, that did not have it is said ??? to him until ??? so that ??? justice. on my Name Scripture states: ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn ??? who said to him his rabbi; know you among ??? for me hundred a maneh worth one hundred dinars Really? ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars there are for me next to so-and-so And there is no meaning to the word for me upon it except a single witness from where do we learn that did not have ??? with it Therefore, scripture states: ??? that is false ??? This ??? that is false ??? this one certainly ??? and the Merciful One he said (Ex. 20) No. ??? until that is false except For example, he said: for him certainly one ??? for me and come you to arise there i.e., in another mishna and not you say and not something for it is the case that No. ??? that Even if read thus is forbidden It is because of this: as it is said ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars that did not have it is said ??? so that ??? for me ??? for me ??? upon it ??? from someplace else Therefore, scripture states: ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? two hundred that did not have it is said ??? and I will give thanksgiving to him except to the court so that that did not have ??? to him ??? and not ??? by the ??? from someplace else Therefore, scripture states: ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn that three ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars on the first that it should not be one the master of judgement and two witnesses so that ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars and they shall divide Scripture states: ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn that two ??? one ??? and one ??? the daughter of hundred a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? to him ??? are like him or ??? Scripture states: ??? that is false ??? For are they, they came in front of Raba son of Rav Huna He said to them ??? from where do we learn ??? that did not have Watch out for leading vav "And these are the words of heard the master of judgement ??? before ??? the master of judgement his fellow Scripture states: ??? that is false ??? from where do we learn ??? judgement that did not have ??? his words ??? before ??? the master of judgement his fellow Scripture states: ??? that is false ??? Rav Kahana he would say over (Ex. 20) fill ??? No. ??? (Ezek. 18) and what No. good One who acts in the midst of ??? Rav said: this that comes ??? And Shmuel said this the one who purchased field in which there is upon it ??? It is not ??? except ??? To exclude What then does it mean when it says Rav Pappa said: To exclude a king and Rav Acha son of Ya'akov he said To exclude ??? all the more so a king ??? a king but: ??? according to Torah law, ??? Look, And the rabbbis he ??? before a court or in the case that one is not before a court בית דין ??? about what do they disagree? ??? rabbis in front of Rav ??? ??? R' Meir reasoned ??? Just as ??? himself he is liable Even giving witness ??? himself he is liable ??? Just as ??? between in the house of judgement or whether that did not have in the house of judgement Even giving witness between in the house of judgement or whether that did not have in the house of judgement And the rabbbis reason that ??? Just as ??? himself he is liable Even giving witness ??? himself he is liable ??? Just as ??? others in the house of judgement yes. that did not have in the house of judgement No. Even ??? himself in the house of judgement yes. that did not have in the house of judgement No.

דף לא,ב גמרא

He said to them Rav ??? If it was ??? to it rabbis everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? except we were The reason is is a law established by the Rabbis ??? to it ??? for just as ??? others he is liable ??? himself is it not all the more so? ??? to it by a "kal vachomer" ??? in going from justice. to be ??? Just as ??? others ??? yes. that did not have ??? No. Even ??? himself before a court בית דין yes. that did not have before a court בית דין Watch out for leading vav And they did not say for him rabbis for Rav, ??? who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? For it was taught in a mishna: regarding ??? ??? before a court בית דין or in the case that one is not before a court בית דין ??? himself ??? others he is not liable until ??? in it ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. but the sages say between ??? himself or whether ??? others immediately ??? in it he is liable ??? others ??? the sages, ??? Is this not ??? to it ??? And learn from this ??? yes. ??? there is not in this case. ??? and they are obligated on ??? words For the Rabbis taught in all of them it is said of them ??? here, It is not said of it ??? on ??? and on ??? with ??? How so? How should we understand this? ??? with ??? R' Yehudah said: Rav said in the case of one who says I know ??? -- this refers to forbidden but: Really? know if we are guilty on its account sacrifice if ??? And there is no meaning to the word they are obligated on ??? Let us say, ??? and of Rav ??? No. even though For it was taught in a baraita It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say Here in this case, he that is not it is written ??? is equivalent ??? but: there i.e., in another mishna As it is written ??? even ??? all ??? Come and learn from this.

דף לא,ב משנה

??? How so? he said that two ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness or where they said to him yes. do we ??? to you giving witness can satisfy I ??? And they said "Amen" Behold! these they are obligated ??? upon them ??? occasions except to the court bet din ??? to the court bet din ??? are exempt ??? they are obligated on all One and one ??? about them Hashem occasions before a court בית דין ??? are not they are obligated except One ??? What is the reason? Because ??? it is possible for them ??? and to give thanks ??? they are obligated "In the case of this one after that one," ??? he is liable and the second is exempt ??? one ??? one ??? he is liable they were two ??? witnesses atonement ??? and after this atonement ??? because of ??? would find it possible ???

דף לא,ב גמרא

Shmuel said ??? They said to him: Just as you ran ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness are exempt until ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear from this ??? in the hand of his male slave or who said to them ??? can satisfy I ??? "You ??? to him giving witness ??? Behold! these are exempt