PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א גמרא

until ??? ran ??? for him You might have thought that I would say that immediately ??? like who for he said: them he is equivalent. Come and learn from this. and Here, too, ??? How so? he said ??? etc. he said yes. did not say did not say This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ For if it was No. you say thus regarding ??? where he teaches ??? How so? He said to him: give for me ??? in which there is for me into your hand So, here, he said yes. did not say No. this one (Lev. 5) ??? all ??? except he said This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ Here in this case, also, This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ This What then does it mean when it says If you say, This is satisfactory he said ??? It was taught there i.e., in another mishna because Here in this case, except If you say, did not say for in that place ??? and did not say ??? he said he said why do I have ??? Perhaps ??? Come and hear from this This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel ??? ??? came They said to him: Just as you came ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness are exempt and if ??? about them five occasions ??? From where do we derive this? ??? he ??? to the court bet din No. ??? Abayye said: Scripture states: (Lev. 5) if No. ??? and exalted. ??? No. Watch out for leading vav And I said to you except in a place ??? this ??? this money or property He said to him Rav ??? If so, I would say ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? yes. or in the case that one is not in the house of judgement No. Don't let it enter your mind! as it is taught: (Lev. 5) ??? on all One and one And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? who he is obligated on all One and one For it was taught in a mishna: ??? about them five occasions before a court בית דין ??? yes. they are obligated except One he said R' Shimon What is the reason? Because ??? it is possible for them ??? and to give thanks except Is this not Learn from this ??? except to the court bet din ??? as one ??? this one it would be impossible ??? Rav Chisdah said So, with whom does it agree? R' Yosi the Gallilean She for he said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: even you say rabbis For example, ??? in the midst of so that ??? so that ??? he is equivalent. He said to him Rav Acha ??? so that ??? how much you shall so that ??? for Rav, ??? that they said so that ??? until that they said ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness ??? you shall He said to him Each and every one ??? of ??? "In the case of this one after that one," ??? he is liable and the second ??? that is not For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: can satisfy a single witness is exempt and Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon he is obligated Let us say, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned a single witness For he came ??? he that he came he came and one master reasons that a single witness For he came ??? he came ??? Watch out for leading vav For thus said Abaye: Everyone acknowledges ??? Sotah and Everyone acknowledges ??? Sotah and It is a disagreement ??? Sotah Everyone acknowledges ??? one and Everyone acknowledges ??? on ??? except ??? a single witness For will come ??? will come and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that a thing ??? he is equivalent. ??? Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Back to the main body of the text: Abayye said: Everyone acknowledges ??? Sotah and Everyone acknowledges ??? Sotah and It is a disagreement ??? Sotah Everyone acknowledges ??? one and Everyone acknowledges ??? on ??? Everyone acknowledges ??? Sotah ??? As it is written (Num. 5) and until there is not there all in which there is and Everyone acknowledges ??? Sotah ???

דף לב,ב גמרא

and It is a disagreement ??? Sotah ??? one master reasons that a thing ??? he is equivalent. he is liable and one master reasons that Is this not ??? he is equivalent. but exempt him Everyone acknowledges ??? on ??? Everyone acknowledges ??? one For R' Abba Everyone acknowledges ??? on ??? one Shall I say ??? for he said: for him ??? If it was come? ??? for me it was. ??? and let us say, for him who ??? except For example, ??? As Mar said: ??? to it and from the midst of that it is not possible ??? must make restitution Everyone acknowledges ??? one For R' Abba ??? a person ??? he came in front For R' Ami it was. ??? R' Abba -- in front He went Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it one ??? of him He said to him: yes. ??? Rav Ami said in what way does ??? for this judgement ??? there is not in this case. two ??? Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. one ??? immediately for he said: yes. ??? it was. for him ??? He said to him R' Abba -- it was. for him ??? and It is impossible ??? and all ??? and It is impossible ??? must make restitution Rav Pappa said: Everyone acknowledges ??? death that he was he is liable and Everyone acknowledges ??? death that he was is exempt Everyone acknowledges ??? death that he was is exempt for he said: to it ??? and did not say them to the court For it was taught in a baraita the his wife ??? did he die ??? did he die ??? Everyone acknowledges ??? death that he was he is liable that is not he said ??? and did not say them to the court Learn from this can satisfy ??? he is liable Perhaps ??? one ??? one ??? now "In the case of this one after that one," ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? he is liable and the second is exempt ??? one ??? one ??? it is not necessary to teach this For example, ??? and he returned one from them ??? in the midst of so that ??? and It is to learn from this ??? so that ??? he is equivalent. This is satisfactory for Rav, ??? to it to this some like Rabbi Yosi the Gallilean But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, It is necessary to teach this ??? so that ??? he is equivalent. except to Rabbi Yochanan But the beginning of the teaching, ??? so that ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? so that ??? both why do I have What would you have said? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? and thanks I would say No. ??? they were two ??? witnesses atonement ??? and after this atonement ??? This is satisfactory the second ??? that the atonement offering (kapparah) to it the first except the first why is it that