PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לג,א גמרא

this one ??? the second Ravina said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? the second in the hour of ??? the first ??? What would you have said? most of ??? Come and learn from this. ??? from this No. ???

דף לג,א משנה

can satisfy I ??? if No. ??? in which there is for me in the hand of so-and-so ??? a hand ??? a lost item ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness yes. they are obligated except One ??? that do not do we ??? in which there is to you in the hand of so-and-so ??? a hand ??? a lost item they are obligated on all One and one can satisfy I ??? if No. ??? in which there is for me in the hand of so-and-so ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness yes. they are obligated except One ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness in which there is to you in the hand of so-and-so ??? they are obligated on all One and one can satisfy I ??? if No. ??? in which there is for me in the hand of so-and-so damage ??? damage restitutions for ??? and restitutions for four and five ??? a man so-and-so houses ??? houses ??? My son, ??? among my fellow ??? ??? Behold! these they are obligated

דף לג,א גמרא

They posed this difficulty: can satisfy ??? What then? who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? No. ??? to you for he said: ??? witnesses ??? For ??? to you who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis that they said give thanks ??? and after this ??? witnesses is exempt And the rabbbis for in that place like who they both reason this way Shall I say ??? this one he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: a thing ??? he is equivalent. except ??? that they said a thing ??? Is this not ??? he is equivalent. What then does it mean when it says immediately For this give thanks ??? Is this not ??? for him or, perhaps, now from this No. ??? Come and hear: can satisfy I ??? if No. ??? in which there is for me in the hand of so-and-so damage ??? damage Hey, isn't it the case that ??? damage ??? he ??? a fraction ??? This is satistfactory ??? a fraction ??? except ??? What is there to say? ??? damage ??? We have a tradition that to it ??? he Come and hear: restitutions for ??? It is because of this: ??? and restitutions for four And Hashem It is because of this: ??? a man so-and-so ??? houses It is because of this: ??? And what can we come and learn from this? All of it ??? he But the beginning of the teaching, one Come and learn from this. at the end of the teaching, one Come and learn from this. But the beginning of the teaching, one Come and learn from this. ??? damage ??? he at the end of the teaching, one Come and learn from this. ??? ??? To exclude What then does it mean when it says To exclude ??? son of ??? as it is taught: R' Nechonya ben Hakanah would make Yom Kippur. like Shabbat to restitution Just as Sabbath etc. Come and hear: can satisfy I ??? if No. ???

דף לג,ב גמרא

??? a man so-and-so in that place evil" on houses they are obligated ??? himself is exempt So, with whom does it agree? R' Elazar ??? Shimon She for he said: ??? witnesses ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? is exempt ??? According to the sages, All of it R' Elazar ??? Shimon She This is what he means: No. It concerns itself ??? himself this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper except in a case ??? witnesses A general principle: ???

דף לג,ב משנה

can satisfy I ??? if No. ??? that I a priest that I Levi ??? son of a divorcee ??? son of Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah ??? so-and-so a priest ??? so-and-so Levi that is not son of a divorcee that is not son of Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah ??? a man so-and-so Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? among My son, ??? among my fellow ??? on Shabbat Behold! these are exempt

דף לג,ב גמרא

The reason is ??? so-and-so a priest ??? so-and-so Levi this one a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? in the hand of so-and-so they are obligated this one The tanna teaches: at the end of the teaching, until ??? Shmuel said ??? No. ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case ??? but not ??? The Rabbis taught from where do we learn that do not is what the scripture says. except ??? money or property R' Eliezer says: it is said here, (Lev. 5) ??? and it is said there (Lev. 5) ??? Just as there he does not ??? except ??? money or property Even here, he does not ??? except ??? money or property (Num. 35) ??? that are ??? that did not have ??? money or property ??? in which there is with them ??? in which there is with them ??? and do not ??? that do not with them ??? (Num. 5) ??? that are ??? and there are with them ??? that did not have ??? money or property ??? in which there is with them ??? And there is no meaning to the word with them a priest ??? in which there is with them ??? And there is no meaning to the word with them a priest and do not ??? that do not with them ??? and do not ??? in which there is with them ??? there are with them a priest Rabbi Akiva says: (Lev. 5) and it was the case that For ??? there are ??? that he was he is liable and there are ??? that he was is exempt How so? ??? money or property he is liable Another explanation: is exempt R' Yosi the Gallilean says Behold! he says (Lev. 5) This is only in the case until or he saw or know ??? without ??? without proof is what the scripture says. proof without ??? How so? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? to you before so-and-so so-and-so ??? so-and-so so-and-so ??? This is proof without ??? without proof How so? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? for me before so-and-so so-and-so ??? so-and-so so-and-so ??? This is ??? without proof Rabbi Shimon says: he is liable here, he is liable ??? Just as there he does not ??? except ??? money or property Even here, he does not ??? except ??? money or property And furthermore, is a kal vachomer Just as ??? the one who did in it women ??? he is liable on