PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לד,א גמרא

all One and one before a court בית דין or in the case that one is not before a court בית דין he does not ??? except ??? money or property giving witness that did not have One who acts of it women ??? and he is not liable except One before a court בית דין is it not logical that it should not be ??? except ??? money or property Just as ??? which provides No. One who acts in it ??? shall you say ??? which provides One who acts of it ??? Scripture states: ??? the value of it is said here, (Lev. 5) ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there he does not ??? except ??? money or property Even here, he does not ??? except ??? money or property He disagreed with this Rabbah bar Ulla (Lev. 5) or or ??? that are ??? and there are with them ??? And there is no meaning to the word with them a priest ??? that did not have ??? money or property ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? which provides A sin-offering ??? except ??? which provides Watch out for leading vav he sinned with intent ??? it was. for him ??? which provides A sin-offering who went down ??? Rabbi Akiva says: (Lev. 5) and it was the case that For ??? there are ??? that he was he is liable and there are ??? that he was is exempt How so? ??? money or property he is liable ??? Another explanation: is exempt ??? I Rabbi Akiva ??? right next lit: and leaning What then does it mean when it says ??? between ??? or whether Rabbi Akiva There is this difference between them: can satisfy ??? they are obligated Rabbi Akivah are exempt to R' Yochanan for he said: there i.e., in another mishna can satisfy ??? Even if ??? are exempt Here in this case, What is the difference between ??? Rabbi Akivah There is this difference between them: ??? R' Yosi the Gallilean says This is only in the case until or he saw or know ??? without ??? without proof is what the scripture says. He said to him Rav ??? Let us say, R' Yosi the Gallilean he does not have For R' ??? as it is taught: R' Acha says: a camel ??? between ??? and it is found a camel ??? in his knowledge for this ??? For if it was it has For R' ??? souls also It concerns itself like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? as it is taught: ??? son of ??? if No. I saw one ??? after his fellow to a ruin ??? after him: ??? in his hand ??? I said to him: a wicked person who ??? to this or I or you but: Just as I shall do." that do not ??? for behold! he said Torah (Deut. 17) by the mouth of two witnesses or three witnesses ??? the dead except the place ??? from you And they said they did not stir from there until ??? a snake did he die Even if you say it has of Rabbi ??? This is satisfactory ??? without proof It concerns itself except proof without ??? in what way does It concerns itself who it does not require ??? if ??? in other texts idolatry ??? or Israel ??? if a person ??? or ??? Learn from this his reasoning is Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean can satisfy ??? is exempt For if it was ??? he is liable ??? without proof ??? to it proof without ??? who it does not require ??? the master of A daughter of Israel the master of a virgin the master of the case is that of an elevation-offering, the master of ??? av Hamnunah in front of Rav Yehudah ??? Rav Yehudah ??? for him a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? before so-and-so so-and-so

דף לד,ב גמרא

and witnesses ??? that specific ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him av Hamnunah ??? Just as ??? If it was he said No. they were items Always, ??? If it was he said yes. ??? For they came witnesses What then does it mean when it says you shall He said to him ??? the yoke of come This certain individual ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? to you beside ??? this He said to him No. ??? beside ??? this they came two ??? of him. ??? water beside ??? this he said Reish Lakish: ??? He disagreed with this ??? This judgement ??? he who he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Always, ??? this ??? that it is possible that they said This certain individual ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? to you beside ??? this He said to him No. ??? beside ??? this Always, ??? of him. ??? water beside ??? this he said ??? Raba said to him ??? all the validity that is not ??? upon it ??? does he act? to it Is this not ??? Rabbi Shimon says: he is liable here, he is liable ??? He ascended in the west What then does it mean when it says ??? where he teaches Just as ??? which provides No. One who acts in it ??? himself ??? for him ??? also ??? others ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps Rabbi Shimon ??? to it ??? others he is liable ??? himself is it not all the more so? except ??? where he teaches Just as ??? which provides No. One who acts in it ??? regarding giving witness ??? for him that is not it is written of him. ??? So, here, No. it is written of him. ??? He said to them Rav Huna And what does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps ??? Rabbi Shimon ??? to it And this is like the position ??? to it ??? to it ??? it was. for him ??? which provides the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? it was. for him ??? which provides the laws of misappropriation of sacred things in all benefit ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth and a guilt-offering ??? which provides Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? For he came Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua ??? Rav They said: we were ??? Rabbi Shimon ??? what is the purpose according to him ??? Just as ??? which provides No. One who acts in it ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps For ??? for him ??? according to ??? for him ??? No. ??? and not For didn't them say Raba son of will come According to the sages, Which Tanna taught: ??? No. ??? It is Rabbi Shimon Perhaps ??? to it ??? but: ??? No. ??? giving witness ??? to it ??? Just as ??? yes. ??? No. Even giving witness ??? yes. ??? No. so that thus it will be ???