PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לה,א גמרא

??? the Merciful One ??? regarding ??? and regarding ??? make kiddush. ??? it is said of them ??? here, It is not said of them ??? on ???

דף לה,א משנה

can satisfy I ??? if No. ??? who said a man so-and-so to give for me two hundred zuz and it was not given Behold! these are exempt that do not they are obligated except on ??? money or property ??? can satisfy I ??? for me giving witness ??? Behold! these are exempt because of ??? he stood in the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue and he said can satisfy I ??? "You ??? for me giving witness ??? Behold! these are exempt ??? that it should be ??? he said that two can satisfy I ??? a man so-and-so so-and-so ??? "You ??? for me giving witness ??? that do not do we ??? to you giving witness and they ??? to him giving witness until ??? until or there was one from them ??? or is invalid, Behold! these are exempt ??? in the hand of his male slave or who said to them ??? can satisfy I ??? "You ??? to him giving witness ??? Behold! these are exempt until ???

דף לה,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? if No. ??? who said a man so-and-so to give for me two hundred zuz and it was not given It is possible ??? they are obligated Scripture states: (Lev. 5) ??? the value of it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there ??? money or property and he has Even here, ??? money or property and there are ??? can satisfy I ??? for me giving witness ??? The Rabbis taught can satisfy I ??? for me giving witness ??? It is possible ??? they are obligated Scripture states: (Lev. 5) ??? the voice of ??? This is only in the case until or he saw or know who ??? giving witness ??? and not ??? he stood in the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue and he said ??? Shmuel said even ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this and it was standing ??? What would you have said? like who for he said: them he is equivalent. Come and learn from this. Another teaching is like this: he saw ??? of people they stand ??? and he said to them ??? if "You ??? for me giving witness ??? It is possible ??? they are obligated Scripture states: This is only in the case until Consider this case: No. ??? It is possible even he said all ??? here, Therefore, scripture states: This is only in the case until Consider this case: ??? he said that two can satisfy I ??? The Rabbis taught he said that two can satisfy I ??? so-and-so so-and-so if "You ??? for me giving witness ??? there are. ??? to him giving witness until ??? until or there was one from them ??? or is invalid, It is possible ??? they are obligated Scripture states: (Lev. 5) if No. ??? and exalted. ??? the scripture ??? in the hand of his male slave ??? The Rabbis taught ??? in the hand of his male slave or who said to them ??? "You ??? to him giving witness ??? It is possible ??? they are obligated Scripture states: if No. ??? and exalted. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? he said ??? if ??? it is written if to him No. ??? and exalted. ??? and if after No. ??? is exempt

דף לה,א משנה

??? a commandment I ??? I Behold! these they are obligated spices in the land." Behold! these are exempt in a case where there are one thousand ??? Which ??? lovingkindness." and with all ??? Behold! these they are obligated ??? in all of them he is liable These are the words of Rabbi Meir. and the sages ??? his father and his mother in all of them he is liable These are the words of Rabbi Meir. and the sages ??? himself and his fellow in all of them transgresses without shall you do (Deut. 28) ??? Hashem God and thus ??? God This is ??? in the Torah to ??? to you ??? he is obligated and the sages ???

דף לה,א גמרא

??? What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Yehudah said thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: can satisfy I ??? in the Torah a commandment I ??? in the Torah ??? I ??? is said in the Torah Abaye said to him: but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for it teaches: Rabbi Chiyya ??? I Behold! these they are obligated ??? Is it written except Abayye said: This is what he means: can satisfy I ??? a commandment I ??? I ??? I ??? in a case where there are one thousand ??? Which ??? This comes to imply ??? desolations ??? We challenge that from the following baraita there are desolations ??? and there are desolations that do not ??? These are desolations that do not ??? For example, to ??? God "Your God" ??? who ??? Which my field Hosts Behold! these yes. ??? but: an adult male ??? ??? Rav lovingkindness." Behold! these ??? Abayye said: Our mishna ??? that he was ???

דף לה,ב גמרא

??? that he was ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Raba said to him If so, spices in the land." also ??? the land are his he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus now there i.e., in another mishna immediately ??? something other than this ??? certainly ??? that he was ??? certainly ??? that he was ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Here in this case, immediately That there are heaven and earth spices in the land." he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: The Rabbis taught the writing of ??? teach ??? GOD ??? behold! This is הרי זה he does not ??? from the breasts ??? the house of ??? behold! This is הרי זה ??? Rabbi Yosei says: Hosts all of it ??? that did not have is called Hosts except because of lit. on the reputation of Israel as it is said (Ex. 7) and I took you out ??? with me" the Children of Israel from the land of Egypt Shmuel said That is not the halacha like Rabbi Yosi The Rabbis taught all ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of between before Him." or whether ??? behold! This is הרי זה ??? before him How so? ??? two ??? and Adonai six ??? (Ps. 144) ??? Hashem ??? twenty ??? after it How so? our God ??? their gods ??? "Your God" ??? others say after it he does not ??? immediately His holiness the Name Rav Huna said The halacha is ??? Solomon Daniel ??? all desolations ??? in the Torah ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use except from this that he was weekday as it is said (Gen. 18) and he said Adonai if please, ??? son of my brother Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer ??? And they said Even this and that which was sanctified for Temple use like who ??? this one for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said that is large ??? -- more ??? the face of the Shechinah-presence like who ??? all desolations ??? weekday except from this that he was and that which was sanctified for Temple use as it is said (Gen. 19) and he said Lot ??? to please, my Lord." there are please, he found Your servant ??? etc. who in which there is in his hand ??? this the Holy One, Who is Blessed all desolations ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? weekday Rabbi Eliezer says ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? there are from them weekday and there are from them and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? teach weekday ??? Which and that which was sanctified for Temple use except from this ??? teach This is only in the case and that which was sanctified for Temple use (Judges 18) all my days: ??? the house of God ??? all desolations ??? Benjamin Rabbi Eliezer says weekday Rabbi Yehoshua says: and that which was sanctified for Temple use He said to him: ??? And so ??? and does not makes He said to him: R' Yehoshua Just as ??? One who acts and they No. ??? if ??? if ??? on ??? as it is said (Judges 20) ??? son of ??? son of ??? before him in those days saying: ??? any more to go out ??? with ??? Benjamin my brother if ??? etc. all Solomon ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? to whoever ??? are his except from this (Song of Songs 8) ??? mine before ??? to you Solomon Solomon for him and two hundred ??? ??? rabbis and there are those who say יש אומרים Even this weekday (Song of Songs 3) there are his bed ??? Even this and not ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for Shmuel said: ??? one ??? in reality No. ??? as it is said ??? mine before ??? to you Solomon ??? and two hundred ??? ??? Shmuel No. ??? and not ??? except This is what he means: and there are those who say יש אומרים this and that which was sanctified for Temple use and this he weekday ??? And for Shmuel for he said: ??? all ??? weekday except from this that he was and that which was sanctified for Temple use (Dan. 2) ??? the king ??? heaven? ??? and he reads He gave to you and there are those who say יש אומרים Even this and that which was sanctified for Temple use as it is said (Dan. 4) ??? a dream ??? for one he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: If it was You might have thought ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Israel ??? them to Israel And the first tanna reasoned the enemies of Israel that it is possible the enemies of some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles ??? and with all ??? Behold! these they are obligated ??? We challenge that from the following baraita (Num. 5) He shall give" Hashem ??? Just as Scripture states: Does it not clearly ??? say ??? the his wife ??? on account of as it is said (Lev. 5) ??? the voice of ??? it is said here, ??? and it is said there ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? Just as there at the Name Even here, at the Name Abayye said: There is no difficulty. this one Rabbi ??? son of This this one rabbis as it is taught: Rabbi ??? son of This says Because and he said Torah ??? and do not ??? and do not ??? Just as ??? at the Name Also, not any ??? at the Name Just as ??? at the Name Also, not any ??? at the Name And the rabbbis If it was We have a tradition that ??? the value of ??? in that place ??? If it was No. We have a tradition that ??? the value of ??? She ??? them ??? them ??? yes. ??? except ??? And thus it says (Num. 5) ??? the his wife ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? it is written thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? yes. ??? except ??? And thus it says ??? the his wife ???