PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לז,א גמרא

them ??? in it What then? immediately ??? he ??? the Torah No. ??? sacrifice and here in this other case, ??? sacrifice there is no difference ??? of him. and there is no difference No. ??? of him. or, perhaps, that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case that is not ??? of him. but: in a case ??? of him. ??? sacrifice No. ??? or, perhaps, this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? He said to him ??? is stricter ??? on ??? and on ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? for him on ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? of him. and he said ??? yes. sacrifice No. And what does it mean when it says ??? for him ??? sacrifice and not ??? He said to them Raba son of will come Which Tanna taught: ??? No. ??? Rabbi Shimon but: According to the sages, sacrifice also ??? He said to them Rav Kahana son of ??? to it and that is what we learned to it one ??? and one ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? For this there i.e., in another mishna A sin-offering the daughter of ??? and here in this other case, a guilt-offering By means of money ??? Perhaps that is not ??? of him. ??? Come and hear: yes. they are obligated on ??? Just as there are. they are obligated on ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? Is this not ??? of him. So, here, that is not ??? of him. Come and hear: No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? tamei which provides ??? shall you say ??? that is not ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? of him. and he said shall you say ??? that is not ??? but: sacrifice ??? What then does it mean when it says he does not ??? he has become exempt ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? tamei he has become exempt ??? this one sacrifice it is written of him. there i.e., in another mishna ??? sacrifice so that thus it will be ??? upon it euphemisms for nazarite vows ??? rabbis in front of Rabbah He said to them we generalize from here No. ??? of him. and there are witnesses ??? items in reality he Perhaps, his reasoning is Rabbah ??? in which there is upon it witnesses is exempt He said to him Rav ??? It was taught: ??? to you (Lev. 5) ??? of it creates an exclusion ??? to one from ??? or to one from ??? (Lev. 5) and "on has sworn that is false creates an exclusion to the borrower with a contract and to the borrower ??? He said to him: If it was It is because of this: this one No. ??? in the case of one who says ??? and not ??? and not ??? with a contract From where can you derive When the baraita teaches ??? of it creates an exclusion ??? to one from ??? or to one from ??? This to one from ??? How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? for him In the midpoint of that are his Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. ??? except Is this not that they said for him ??? and he said to them No. ??? for him ??? items in reality ??? items at the end of the teaching, also ??? items ??? guilt-obligation ??? the house ??? Come and hear: he is not liable on ??? What then? he is liable on ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? Is this not ??? witnesses No. ??? himself Come and hear: they were two ??? witnesses atonement ??? and after this atonement ??? because of ??? giving witness ??? This is satisfactory the second ??? for it is the case that atonement to it ??? the first except the first why is it that ???

דף לז,ב גמרא

this one ??? the second Ravina said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? the second in the hour of ??? What would you have said? most of ??? Come and learn from this. now Regardless, life ??? and not ??? Come and hear: the master of the house ??? claims ??? and "??? has sworn witnesses if before it was even the case that ??? witnesses ??? must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth and a guilt-offering if ??? witnesses ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? and a guilt-offering Here in this case, also, ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: Come and hear: is stricter from it ??? on ??? and on ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? from this general principle it would follow That there are witnesses and he said on ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? He said to them Rav ??? son of ??? them Rav Kahana I ??? to it and that is what we learned to it one ??? and one ??? a guilt-offering By means of money ??? Come and hear: No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? tamei which provides ??? shall you say ??? that is not ??? How so? If it was ??? witnesses why is it that ??? except This is obvious! That there are witnesses And we have learned shall you say ??? that is not ??? he that is not ??? but: sacrifice ??? This decisively refutes the position of Rabbah, and he is refuted! Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? in which there is upon it witnesses he is liable with a contract is exempt Rav Pappa said: What is his reason of Rabbi Yochanan witnesses ??? a legal document this one he would place He said to him: Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua for Rav, ??? also does he act? ??? except Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua we were his reason of Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: ??? a legal document ??? And there is no meaning to the word bring in sacrifice on ??? it was said: can satisfy ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? One says he is liable and one says is exempt ??? of Rabbi Yochanan for he said: is exempt ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? in which there is upon it witnesses he is liable a legal document is exempt And it is like Rav ??? the son of of Rav Joshua ??? He said to him Rabbi ??? to R' ??? Let us say, Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Eliezer ??? of Rabbi Eliezer And the rabbbis ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? field from his fellow ??? river he is liable ??? to him field these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer but the sages say says to him Behold! ??? before you say about what do they disagree? Rabbi Eliezer he expounds. ??? And the rabbbis ??? Rabbi Eliezer he expounds. ??? (Lev. 5) ??? or ??? a hand ??? or from all who shall vow ??? had a vision The entirety What then does it mean when it says ??? In all things And what does it mean when it says ??? documents And the rabbbis ??? A general principle: ??? or ??? a hand or ??? creates an exclusion or from all who shall vow upon it and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing ??? money or property Even any thing ??? money or property they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? that do not ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah slaves ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah documents ??? by the mouth of ??? yes. ??? money or property one ??? like Rabbi Eliezer and one ??? He said to him: No. one ??? like Rabbi Eliezer and one ??? He could say to you In this case, even Rabbi Eliezer give thanks ??? he said from all and not The entirety Rav Pappa said: in the name of Raba Our mishna also ??? where he teaches ??? ??? and he says No. ??? I and he said "Amen" he is liable And even ??? my slave No. The tanna teaches: What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? And there is no meaning to the word bring in sacrifice on ??? Rav said ??? in the name of Raba I would say at the end of the teaching, This is the general rule: all ??? by the mouth of himself he is liable but when it is not must make restitution by the mouth of himself is exempt This is the general rule: it uses these particular words to include what? Is this not to include ??? my slave