It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לח,א גמרא

except ??? there is not in this case. ??? How so? give for me ??? in which there is for me into your hand ??? The rabbis taught: A general principle: he is not liable except One creates an exclusion he is liable on all One and one These are the words of Rabbi Meir. R' Yehuda says: ??? No. to you and not to you and not to you he is liable on all One and one Rabbi Eliezer says: No. to you and not to you and not to you ??? he is liable on all One and one Rabbi Shimon says: until ??? for all One and one Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The general principle of Rabbi Meir ??? of Rabbi Yehudah The general principle of Rabbi Yehudah ??? of Rabbi Meir And R' Yochanan said: Everyone acknowledges ??? to you that he was creates an exclusion No. ??? except without to you for Rabbi ??? says creates an exclusion and Rabbi Yehudah says A general principle: and Who is The general principle of R' Meir ??? that do not to you ??? about what do they disagree? Shmuel ??? and R' Yochanan ??? Shmuel ??? Rabbi Yehudah and not to you ??? you shall from this general principle it would follow ??? to R' ??? for he said: ??? you shall He said to him: R' Yehudah ??? you shall And R' Yochanan said: both of them. to R' ??? you shall and Rabbi Yehudah said to him: ??? to you ??? to you without to you ??? And for Shmuel until ??? for him ??? upon it ??? and Rabbi Yochanan ??? R' Meir ??? that do not to you ??? you shall from this general principle it would follow ??? to you ??? you shall For if it was You might have thought and not to you ??? it was. ??? to us ??? that do not to you ??? No. to you and not to you and not to you all the more so ??? that do not to you ??? And Shmuel said all One who says and not to you ??? that do not to you ??? he is equivalent. We have learnt in a Mishna: No. to you and not to you and not to you It was taught by No. to you Come and hear: give for me ??? a hand ??? a lost item It was taught by ??? a hand ??? a lost item Come and hear: give for me ??? It was taught by ??? and that one a Tanna taught: all thus ??? It was taught by and it comes but how do you reconcile that with this teaching with whom does it agree? Rabbi She for he said: there is no difference an olive's volume an olive's volume and there is no difference an olive's volume and an olive's volume ??? you shall Come and hear: ??? R' Meir says even ??? he is liable on all One and one It was taught by ??? What then does it mean when it says even Rav Acha said the son of of Rav ??? even ??? are in the general category ??? are in the general category ??? are in the general category ??? give for me ??? a hand ??? a lost item in which there is for me into your hand ??? give for me ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? They disagreed about this, Rav Acha and Ravina One says ??? No. ??? and one says ??? also ??? R' Chiyya Behold! here, ??? ten sin-offerings and if ??? twenty there shall be This a Tanna taught: ??? He accounts for ??? No. ??? He accounts for Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Chiyya taught Behold! here, twenty sin-offerings this particular ??? a hand ??? a lost item Raba brought this very question ??? they were five specific properties that specific and They said to him: give to us ??? a hand ??? a lost item in which there is to us into your hand he said to one from them ??? that do not to you ??? a hand ??? a lost item and not to you and not to you and not to you and not to you What then? ???

דף לח,ב גמרא

or, perhaps, he ate one and one ??? Come and hear: for it teaches: Rabbi Chiyya Behold! here, twenty sin-offerings How so? If it was ??? Rabbi Chiyya ??? he came ??? except Is this not that is not ??? And learn from this ??? houses ??? he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba Rabbi Yochanan said: What is the reason? of Rabbi Shimon Because the essence ??? he ??? Rabba said: is from that which is belonging to of Rabbi Shimon For what reason The matter is comparable to a person who said to his fellow give for me ??? in which there is for me into your hand He said to him: ??? that do not to you ??? he the one who does not have this one ??? it has this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper and so when ??? Abaye said to him: who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna ??? for him ??? No. ??? for him Here in this case, ??? the validity he that he came ??? for him this one No. is comparable except ??? to his fellow give for me ??? in which there is for me into your hand ??? that do not to you ??? A general principle: ??? he the one who does not have this one ??? it has ??? except For he came ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: according to the words of ??? Shimon ??? he ??? and not ??? according to the words of the sages Even ??? he ??? in what way ??? Rav Pappa said: Rabbi Shimon reasoned No. ??? something ??? something that is not ??? And the rabbbis reason that No. ??? something and so when give thanks of him. No. ??? something and so when give thanks of him. ???

דף לח,ב משנה

??? two silver ??? and if yes. ??? is exempt How so? two silver for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? is exempt two silver ??? for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? he is liable a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand yes. to you ??? is exempt a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? he is liable a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? is exempt because it was ??? a lost item a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand He said to him: there are. tomorrow He said to him: ??? for me ??? to you is exempt yes. to you ??? he is liable a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand He said to him: there are. to ??? for me except ??? tomorrow He said to him: ??? for me ??? to you he is liable because of ??? gold there are for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? silver is exempt ??? gold there are for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? silver ??? he is liable ??? One ??? for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? is exempt ??? fruits for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? he is liable ??? are in the general category fruits ??? to him ??? is exempt and Rabban Gamliel he is obligated ??? to his fellow ??? oil ??? to him ??? says Because ??? to him a small portion of ??? shall vow But the sages say: yes. ??? he said Rabban Gamliel one who sees I these are the words of ??? vessels ??? ??? is exempt ??? in part ??? is exempt in part the vessels he is liable ??? that do not to them liens on ??? ??? in which they have liens on ??? about them yes. ??? on claims A deaf person a mute and a child And there is no meaning to the word ??? ??? but: ???

דף לח,ב גמרא

in what way does ??? for him Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? that specific ??? in the Torah As it is written (Gen. 24) ??? in Hashem. the God of the heavens Ravina said to Rav Ashi: like who like Rabbi ??? son of This for he said: in the case of in that place ??? He said to him: Even if you say rabbis that they said ??? and practical distinction It is necessary for him ??? in his hands ??? for he said: Raba This ??? in Hashem. the God of the heavens was it made? ??? In the matter ??? and he returns And Rav Pappa said This ??? was it made? ??? In the matter ??? and he returns And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of Raba And the halacha is not is according to either opinion ??? of Rav ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of Raba for it is the case that No. and took ??? in his hands And the halacha is not is according to either opinion ??? of Rav ??? for it is the case that and took ??? in his hands ??? a scholar ??? in the book Torah a scholar initially ??? The Rabbis taught ??? Even She ??? say to him you shall know

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.