PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

??? He said to him Is this not ??? four are they, they stand they came two ??? And they said yes. ??? four are they, they stand Rabba said: ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? all the validity that is not ??? upon it ??? Is this not ??? Raba said to him ??? This certain individual ??? Give for me hundred ??? about You Hey, isn't it the case that ??? He said to him ??? He said to him: ??? Rav Nachman said ??? Rav Papa said, No. ??? and for Rav, ??? what is the difference here, ??? for he said: for him ??? Give for me hundred ??? about You Hey, isn't it the case that ??? He said to him Is this not ??? for me and come? ??? He said to him: ??? And Rav Pappa said ??? there i.e., in another mishna immediately for he says ??? for me ??? Here in this case, ??? What then do we do about it? Rav ??? he said No. ??? Rav Sheishet the son of of Rav This he said ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? and what case is he dealing with? ??? in the presence of ??? and not ??? for him ??? but: ??? between that are his for him ??? to say No. they were items Always, It is possible also to say ??? the son of R' ??? This certain individual for he said: for him ??? for me all begins ??? that you said for me No. ??? He went ??? in the presence of ??? Abaye and Raba who both say this one ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? who ??? This certain individual ??? for me ??? two all begins ??? that you said No. ??? He went ??? in the presence of three Rav Pappa said: ??? two ??? three No. ??? He said to him Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua for Rav, ??? that they said rabbis ??? according to most of ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in the matter of ??? but: in the matter of giving witness hundred ??? and two ??? other than this This certain individual ??? for me ??? two all begins ??? that you said No. ??? He went ??? in the presence of three Rav Pappa said: ??? two ??? three No. ??? He disagreed with this Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua two ??? hundred ??? and if He said to him ??? three and He went ??? in the presence of among four immediately who went down to lead services ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down ??? yes. ??? on claims A deaf person a mute and a child And there is no meaning to the word ??? ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Scripture states: (Ex. 22) For He shall give" a man to his neighbor silver or vessels to watch And there is no meaning to the word ??? a child ??? but: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? But the beginning of the teaching, yes. ??? on claims a mute and a child Rav said ??? his father and R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov She as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says occasions ??? "on has sworn claims himself How so? He said to him: a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? Behold! this "??? has sworn on claims himself but the sages say he does not except ??? a lost item but exempt him and R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov he does not have he responds a lost item is exempt Rav said ??? a child a child ??? yes. ??? on claims A deaf person a mute and a child In reality lit: In the world The greatness But why? ??? for him a child ??? words ??? a child he If so, claims himself claims others She claims others ??? himself

דף מב,ב גמרא

all of them also claims others ??? himself ??? except ??? what they disagree about for he said: Rabbah On account of what he said Torah give thanks a small portion of ??? shall vow ??? yes. a person ??? his face before the master of ??? and that one ??? he is required ??? and that one that is not ??? It is because of this: ??? his face before the master of ??? he is required ??? for him and that one that is not ??? for him ??? he that he came ??? of him reasoned until that there is for me ??? for him and the Merciful One he said pointed out a contradiction. ??? so that thus it will be ??? for him ??? R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov reasoned there is no difference in it and there is no difference ??? he does not ??? and Therefore, Is this not he responds a lost item he And the rabbbis reason that in his face, he ??? but: before his son ??? he responds a lost item he who seeks ??? to it like Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov this one The tanna teaches: But the beginning of the teaching, a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? is exempt because of ??? a lost item he there i.e., in another mishna that is not he said ??? for me Here in this case, for he said: ??? for me Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said ??? a child ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? a child ??? No. ??? except ??? both why do I have Watch out for leading vav And hey, you can also come and hear from this. ??? for it teaches: Abaye ??? where they said ??? and it is not necessary to say children between ??? between ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? No. ??? except ??? and What do I have to learn from ??? and What do I have to learn from ??? It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that ??? he ??? makes ??? on ??? but: that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? a person makes ??? on that which was sanctified for Temple use Come and hear from this For didn't Rav Huna say ??? all ??? and he said a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? faithfully ??? yes. a person makes ??? on that which was sanctified for Temple use They said: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? a person a sinner and not to him but: regarding ??? certainly there is a fear of them.

דף מב,ב משנה

and these items that do not ??? about them ??? and contracts ??? They do not have restitutions for ??? and not restitutions for four and five ??? although we don't deserve it. he does not "??? has sworn the reward for he does not must make restitution R' Shimon says holy offerings ??? to replace them ??? about them but when it is not he is liable to replace them yes. ??? about them Rabbi Meir says: there are items that are in the earth and are not ??? And there is no meaning to the word the sages "We thank..." to him How so? ten vines ??? to you ??? says are not except ??? Rabbi Meir he is obligated ??? but the sages say all ??? to the earth Behold! he ??? yes. ??? except on a thing ??? How so? the house of fill ??? to you and a purse fill ??? to you ??? says Really? know except Just as ??? you take is exempt this one says until ??? and this one says until ??? he is liable

דף מב,ב גמרא

restitutions for ??? From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Ex. 22) on any thing ??? A general principle: on ox and on a donkey and on ??? and on Solomon creates an exclusion on all it was lost misplaced and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing ??? money or property Even any thing ??? money or property they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? that do not ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah slaves ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah documents ??? that are ??? yes. ??? money or property that which was sanctified for Temple use his neighbor ??? restitutions for ??? and not four ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא restitutions for four and five the Merciful One in the Torah says and not restitutions for three ??? although we don't deserve it. he does not ??? From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught