PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מג,א גמרא

(Ex. 22) For He shall give" a man to his neighbor A general principle: silver or vessels creates an exclusion to watch and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing ??? money or property Even any thing ??? money or property they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? that do not ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah slaves ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah documents ??? by the mouth of ??? yes. ??? money or property that which was sanctified for Temple use his neighbor ??? the reward for he does not ??? From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Ex. 22) For He shall give" a man to his neighbor A general principle: a donkey or ox or ??? creates an exclusion and all livestock to watch and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: etc. until that which was sanctified for Temple use his neighbor ??? Rabbi Meir says: there are items that are ??? and are not ??? from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi ??? reasoned all ??? to the earth he does not ??? R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina Here in this case, ??? what they disagree about of Rabbi ??? reasoned ??? And the rabbbis reason that No. ??? yes. ??? except on a thing ??? Abayye said: They did not teach such a ruling except for he said: for him the house of ??? but: He said to him: the house of this fill ??? Raba said to him If so, ??? at the end of the teaching, this one says until ??? and this one says until ??? he is liable ??? ??? ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? in the house of fill but: the house of this fill he is liable except Rabba said: In reality lit: In the world he is not liable until ??? In the matter ??? to him In the matter ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba ??? for me into your hand ??? says yes. to you ??? is exempt ??? that is large there are for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? a small one is exempt ??? that is large there are for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except ??? a small one is exempt but: He said to him: ??? there are for me into your hand ??? says yes. to you ??? except ??? he is liable ??? the daughter of ten ??? there are for me into your hand yes. to you ??? except the daughter of ??? he is liable "The general principle of the thing is that In reality lit: In the world he is not liable until ??? In the matter ??? to him In the matter ??? "The general principle of the thing is that it uses these particular words to include what? Is this not to include the house of this fill and what is the difference here, ??? that is large ??? a small one Just as ??? No. ??? to him for just as who gave thanksgiving to him No. ??? If so, the daughter of ten the daughter of ??? also Just as ??? No. ??? to him for just as who gave thanksgiving to him No. ??? he said R' Shmuel son of Rav Isaac Here in this case, ??? of ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that he came give thanks for him ??? If so, ??? also ??? except ??? No. The tanna teaches: Here in this case, also, ??? No. The tanna teaches: except he said R' Abba -- son of ??? that I ??? Because It is possible ??? on ???

דף מג,א משנה

??? his fellow on ??? He said to him: a sela coin ??? upon it ??? he was the value of ??? says No. For rather, a sela coin ??? upon it and a sela coin he was the value of is exempt a sela coin ??? upon it ??? he was the value of ??? says No. For rather, a sela coin ??? upon it and three ??? he was the value of he is liable a sela coin ??? upon it and two he was the value of ??? says No. For rather, a sela coin ??? upon it and a sela coin he was the value of is exempt a sela coin ??? upon it and two he was the value of ??? says No. For rather, a sela coin ??? upon it and five ??? he was the value of he is liable and who "who has sworn ??? opposite him. lest shall vow this and Let him bring forth ??? ???

דף מג,ב גמרא

??? Shall I say ??? Is it not enough for him ??? regarding ??? Shmuel said He interprets it as referring to the earlier text and thus he said Rabbi Chiyya son of Rav He interprets it as referring to the earlier text and thus that R' Yochanan said He interprets it as referring to the earlier text What then does it mean when it says But the beginning of the teaching, at the end of the teaching, that at the beginning of the teaching a sela coin ??? upon it ??? he was the value of ??? says No. For rather, a sela coin ??? upon it and three ??? he was the value of he is liable ??? regarding ??? She ??? rabbis ??? and now for he said: Rav Ashi ??? to us this "that is not has sworn ??? and this "how much has sworn the value of thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: who "at first has sworn who ??? opposite him. lest shall vow this and Let him bring forth ??? ??? Shmuel said And if one ??? a thousand ??? and tabernacle. for him ??? a thousand ??? but: both ??? No. Rav ??? he said Even if both ??? one ??? hundred ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? completely but: ??? No. ??? They said: even ??? a fraction ??? completely We have learnt in a Mishna: a sela coin ??? upon it ??? he was the value of ??? says No. For rather, a sela coin ??? upon it and three ??? he was the value of he is liable Let us say, for him this one ??? Our mishna ??? Shmuel that it was not the case that ??? Let us say, ??? his fellow on ??? shall vow and wash ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer Rabbi Akiva says: It is possible he ??? to him anything ??? except on ??? he loses it ??? but: ??? zuz with a contract ??? in his hand the words of all are ??? he loses it ??? How so? If it was ??? the measure ???