PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מה,א משנה

One ??? and one ??? and even ??? without worth he was one from them ??? with usurious interest ??? " take has sworn they were ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei Rabbi Meir says: they shall divide ??? on ??? How so? No. ??? to him It is written on ??? that you he is liable for me two hundred zuz except says to him give to the children of ??? give ??? a sela coin coins he says I have given there are. say No. ??? he " take has sworn there are. ??? he said son of ??? How so? both these and these: have come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? without worth except he take that did not have ??? there are. ??? that did not have ??? he said the shopkeeper give for me ??? fruits and gave to him He said to him: give for me that specific ??? He said to him: ??? to you ??? shall vow the master of the house ??? to him ??? He said to him: give for me the fruits? He said to him: ??? to you ??? shall vow the shopkeeper Rabbi Yehudah says all ??? in his hand ??? on the upper one he said the moneychanger give for me ??? coins and gave to him He said to him: give for me ??? He said to him: I have given to you ??? shall vow the master of the house he gave to him ??? He said to him: give for me ??? He said to him: ??? to you ??? shall vow the moneychanger Rabbi Yehudah says yes. a way the moneychanger to give ??? until ??? in the same way where they said ??? her ketubah written contract No. ??? except ??? and a single witness ??? that it ??? No. ??? except ??? No. ??? except ??? that did not have in his face, No. ??? except ??? and thus ??? No. ??? except ??? that did not have ??? Abba and did not say to us Abba that did not have ??? between his legal documents of Abba ??? this ??? R' Yochanan son of ??? says Even if nolad ??? after ??? Behold! this " take has sworn Thus said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? if there are witnesses who said ??? in the hour of ??? a legal document this he does not ??? he take that did not have ??? and these ??? that did not have ??? the his wife ??? in the midst of the house son of the house He said to him: Just as you ??? for me he is liable ??? yes. It is possible ??? to him ??? from someplace else ??? upon it The entirety ??? ???

דף מה,א גמרא

all ??? and not ??? From where do we derive this? For scripture said: (Ex. 22) ??? and not ??? who ??? to make whole to him ??? and these ??? what is the difference here, ??? they decreed for him rabbis ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said ??? that are large ??? here, ??? Behold! Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? except I would say ??? that are large ??? here, that are large from this general principle it would follow That there are ??? except Rav Nachman said Shmuel said ??? here, ??? rabbis ??? the house ??? It is because of this: so that ??? It is because of this: so that ??? for him ??? the house the master of the house ??? it's settled. for him ??? so that thus it will be ??? for him ??? it's settled. for him ??? the master of the house ??? so that thus it will be ??? the master of the house a householder ba'al habayit' on ??? also on ??? except a householder ba'al habayit' ??? he ??? for him without ??? so that ??? of a householder ba'al habayit' ??? for him ??? it is a burden for him the validity ??? for him from the beginning ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

If so, even ??? also Why is it that It was taught: artisan says two ??? for me ??? says No. ??? to you except One the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? certainly ??? for him If so, Even if once its time is over also Why is it that It was taught: once its time is over and it was not given to him Behold! this he does not " take has sworn ??? yes. the master of the house transgresses ??? the master of the house ??? he What case is he dealing with? ??? time ??? he For ??? time ??? pointed out a contradiction. ??? And so ??? transgresses It is because of this: (Lev. 19) ??? regarding the master of the house that it is possible two ??? one ??? the master of the house transgresses (Lev. 19) ??? and one ??? his worth Rav Nachman said Shmuel said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: his worth without witnesses from the midst of that it is possible to say to him No. ??? Always, It is possible to say to him ??? and I have given to you ??? He said to him Rabbi Isaac ??? and thus Rabbi Yochanan said: from this general principle it would follow ??? upon it Reish Lakish: that it is possible that they said ??? it was. two for him ??? for him and there are that they said ??? it was. ??? for him ??? for him it was said: also Rav said ??? son of ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: his worth without witnesses from the midst of that it is possible to say to him No. ??? Always, It is possible to say to him ??? and I have given to you ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama how elevated is this one ??? He said to him: Raba What is the good thing about it, If so, ??? the Merciful One in what way does It concerns itself from the midst of that it is possible to say to him No. they were items Always, It is possible to say to him ??? for him ??? from the midst of that it is possible to say to him ??? to you It is possible to say to him ??? for him ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? they both reason this way ??? next to his fellow ??? it is not necessary to turn to him ??? with a contract It is necessary for him to turn to him ??? a seminal emission pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama upon it of Rav ??? (I Sam 21) and he shall place David the things ??? in his heart ??? Rav Sheishet ??? son of Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said for him It was taught by Master, something ??? He said to him: yes. ??? " take has sworn How so? at a time i.e., in a case who said to him ??? and not ??? for me ??? says ??? and I have given to you ??? but: He said to him: two ??? for me ??? says No. ??? to you except One the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? this one ??? you shall But the beginning of the teaching, without proof Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said