PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.

Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.

I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.

The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.

I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.

In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.

Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

??? yes. in reality ??? he expounds. and here in this other case, we were The reason is ??? of the academy of R' Yishmael ??? of the academy of R' Yishmael (Lev. 11) in water in water two occasions yes. this A general principle: and creates an exclusion except ??? And the rabbbis Ravina said ??? in the west in all places where you finds two ??? this to this ??? creates an exclusion ??? are in the general category and creates an exclusion now that you said Rabbi ??? he expounds. the master of ??? it is a problem oaths except ??? He used the wording who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? for him No. ??? Back to the main body of the text: from where do we learn that is not he is liable except on in which there is ??? at the beginning ??? in the rear of ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 5) ??? two occasions these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi says it is not necessary for him Behold! he says ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? This is only in the case know Behold! here, two ??? If so, Just as Scripture states: ??? on ??? and on ??? Mar said: ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? Rabba said: ??? it is written but it ??? from him He said to him Abaye Except I can object with text from here: regarding Sotah As it is written (Num. 5) ??? from this general principle it would follow that there is know from the beginning If it was it was. know who Examine to it ??? and this was taught! (Num. 5) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? the his wife this particular ??? answer at a time i.e., in a case ??? they examine his wife yes. Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? yes. ??? they examine his wife And, too, regarding Torah As it is written (Job 28) ??? all ??? the heavens ??? from this general principle it would follow That there are ??? know of him. For it is written (Job 28) No. know ??? except Abayye said: his reasoning is Rabbi ??? the house of his rabbi; her name ??? He said to him Rav ??? Rather, that which was taught there is not there ??? at the beginning and there is ??? in the rear of who that it is possible the one who does not have ??? the house of his rabbi; He said to him yes. It concerns itself ??? to among ??? Sabbath two that are ??? It was taught there: ??? Sabbath there are two that are actually four inside and there are two that are actually four outside Why is it different here, ??? two that are four And naught else and why is it different there, for it teaches: there are two that are actually four inside and there are two that are actually four outside there i.e., in another mishna ??? Sabbath he It was taught by the forefathers ??? Here in this case, ??? the essence Sabbath he the forefathers It was taught by ??? No. It was taught by the forefathers What then does it mean when it says ??? both there shall be And if you would say from them ??? and from them ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is equivalent ??? leprous plague The tanna teaches: Just as there i.e., in another mishna all of them ??? Even Here in this case, all of them ??? except Rav Pappa said: there i.e., in another mishna ??? Sabbath It was taught by ??? Here in this case, ??? It was taught by ??? No. It was taught by ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? both he ??? two ??? and two ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: Rav Ashi said a Tanna taught: ??? also ??? a seminal emission to it From where can you derive

דף ה,ב גמרא

For it was taught in a baraita the taking out for the domain to domain he is liable Are we are not dealing that he came ??? a seminal emission for him ??? and Perhaps ??? for the domain Watch out for leading vav or the individual to the public thoroughfare If so, ??? the taking out for the domain Watch out for leading vav or the individual to the public thoroughfare What then does it mean when it says for the domain to domain that even for the domain the public to domain Watch out for leading vav or the individual ??? a seminal emission to it ??? and the reason What then does it mean when it says a Tanna taught: all ??? valued him, and from its place ??? a seminal emission to it Ravina said Our mishna also ??? where he teaches ??? Sabbath there are two that are actually four inside and there are two that are actually four outside ??? Learn from this Rava said: ??? The tanna teaches: ??? Sabbath ??? symptoms lit: appearances of leprous plague two that are ??? It was taught there: symptoms lit: appearances of leprous plague two that are four ??? the second to it ??? the second to it ??? An egg Rabbi Chanina said: Which Tanna taught: symptoms lit: appearances of leprous plague that is not ??? For if it was Rabbi Akiva immediately for he said: -- this refers to is more ??? -- this refers to is more ??? If so, ??? one ??? that it is possible ??? of him ??? Is this not ??? that are his he If so, ??? An egg also ??? one ??? that it is possible ??? of him ??? Is this not son of of him he